• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

thoughts on inerrancy

sensational

Newbie
Jan 20, 2011
173
11
Southern California
✟22,864.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Of course everyone is free to add comments, but I am most interested in hearing the thoughts of those who hold scripture to be inerrant.

I am one who believes scripture to be inerrant, but even amongst those of us who take that position there is considerable variety. So, the aspect I'm most interested in is the efficacy of your position. What I mean by that is: how does a believer interact with scripture? As an example, if you believe only the original document was inerrant, and we no longer have that document, then how does God speak through what we have now?

That's just a starter. I'm sure the variety of opinion will raise even more interesting issues as time goes by.

I think all theories of inerrancy are not without difficulty. Those that hold to total inerrancy have to deal with errors in the Bible, those who believe that the Bible is inerrant only in matters of faith and morals for our salvation have to deal with deciding on what criteria and how to identify specifically what is in the Bibe that is inerrant for the sake of our salvation and what isnt.
 
Upvote 0

sensational

Newbie
Jan 20, 2011
173
11
Southern California
✟22,864.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I don't like textural and historical criticism (I happen to have a degree in history) when it comes to scripture. People bring just as much bias to that excercise as they do to "follow your heart."

The misuse of historical criticism says nothing about the efficacy or lack thereof of its use as a tool for the researcher.
 
Upvote 0

MrPolo

Woe those who call evil good + good evil. Is 5:20
Jul 29, 2007
5,871
767
Visit site
✟32,206.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
How hard is it for you to "tell" if someone loves you?
I don't know, but discerning if someone you know and interact with loves you and discerning whether lengthy texts on a piece of papyrus are divinely inspired infallible "Holy Scripture" is not nearly the same thing.
 
Upvote 0

MrPolo

Woe those who call evil good + good evil. Is 5:20
Jul 29, 2007
5,871
767
Visit site
✟32,206.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
hould one be required to take a 'love quiz' to make sure they know for sure if another loves them?

If you claim to be able to identify anything that is Scripture when you read it then you should be able to ace the quiz.
 
Upvote 0