• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Thoughts about "Date Setting" and Daniel 12

taikachanz

God's Word Stands Alone
Feb 20, 2011
168
0
✟22,788.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
For the last three years I have been studying exclusively Daniels prophecies and some of the NW scriptures used to refute the practice of date setting. Using a Stong's Exhaustive Concordence I have discovered a very interesting overlooked aspect of the main verse used to refute the practice. Matt. 24:36 "But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no no the angels of heaven, but my Father only." KJV The key word here is "knoweth". Upon researching this word I discovered that it is from the Greek "eido" "used only in certian past tenses." the definition goes on to explain that other uses of "knoweth" are borrowed from this original yet they are from different words meaning different senses. In other words this scripture could have easily been translated as "But of that day and hour hath no man known the day or the hour." Giving this scripture an entirely different meaning.

Other scriptures, as well, the support of, at least, looking and paying attentiion the signs and indications of that day and hour. God, in Amos promises to inform his prophets as to his actions, would he not also do this near the time of the end? What of Joel when he stated that he would pour out his spirit upon his followers and "old men will dream dreams and young men will see visions?" If we are to believe that God's promises are true would he not give us the means as to determine the "proximity" of that time so that we may better prepare us for that returm the closer it gets? Isn't that what he did with William Miller and the Millerite movement? Even though they wrongly determined the event, the event that was predicted happened and the time prophecy that was involved WAS COMPLETED as was foretold and revealed by William Miller. Can and will this happen again. I believe it will and I will go as far to say that I believe it HAS.

William Miller in his researching the prophecies of Daniel and Revelation and his thurough study of the Bible develop some simple rules that we as Adventist follow today in our daily studies and the first and foremost of these is that we are to let the Bible interpret itself. When there is a question, especially a hard question, we are to search the scriptures for the answer and not go to anyother source for these other sources outside the Bible many times prove to be faulty, nor matter the source. One thing that Miller did not include in has research study facts was this truth that has been overlooked by everyone it seems, Every time prophecy has a distinct start point and every time prophecy has a distinct end point. Knowing this, if we can determine a start point of a time prophecy the end of that prophecy can also be determined. This is a fact that cannot be disputed no matter how hard one tries. It's like say, "I'm going from point A to point B on an unobstructed road, I am the only one going and no one else will be on that road and it will take me this amount of time to get there." and someone saying "no, it won't happen." It will happen, and God has built the road and set the action in motion and nobody, not even Satan can stop it, no matter how hard he may try.

So now you ask, "what is this guy talking about?" Patience, I'm getting there. William Miller dissected the 2300 days (years) prophecy and correctly concluded that a major Biblical event was going to occur in 1843 or 1844. Believing it was the return of Christ he sounded the joyous news throughout the country. At the same time, across the oceans, others had come to the same conclusion independently of Miller. Research it for yourselves, it happened. God had given the message to many of his faithful, not just Miller, though Miller was credited with discovering the truth first. But, although the event was wrongly predicted, the time was not. This in essence was a "Time Setting" event. Do we now condemn William Miller and the others for "Time Setting", supposedly in disobedience to Jesus's assumed admonition against doing such a thing? Heaven forbid, for without this event we as SDA would not now exist and God's remnent church would still be scattered hither and yon.

We forget that Satan hates the idea that Jesus is returning soon and he would do all that he could to disuade us for studying and allowing the Holy Spirit in directing us to the truth of the prophecies. He has, and will, use well meaning Christian to misdirect Christ's church in to false belief and delude many into false speculation, without thurough study of the prophecies and history as well so that the faithful are discouraged and made to say, "the Lord is not near, he will not return in my time for I cannot determine the time of my Lord's return." Thus has been the reaction of mean in the past 150+ years of not only SDA but of others who seek the Lord as well. But we need not be discouraged because the Lord has given us all the knowledge we need and the wherewithal to use that knowledge.

Miller and those that supported him showed that the historicist view of prophecy was the correct way of interpreting prophetic events. But, when the Lord did not appear as expected those who ridiculed Miller turned from this form of exsigesis and turn instead to other means of prophetic interpretation, much to the delight of Satan. But we as SDA continue to hold to this form and correctly so. And now, I turn to history to explain further where I go with this.

History has showng us, through prophecy, who the woman is that sits on the beast in Revelation. It has also shown us who the false prophet shall be and the "lamb with two horns". We have however in correctly determined who the figures are in Daniel 10. In my studies and research I came across several books relating to the Crusades, the RCC and Islam. I know that today many are espousing that Islam is the Antichrist but we know this to be false, however, as with the USA, Islam has played a major role in the history of the world, not only in a religious sense but in a political sense as well. This being said, we must realize that it must play a part somewhere in bible prophecy. If we deny this concerning such a major force than we must also deny this concerning the USA. But we know this not to be the case, for when we look at current events we see more and more that the USA is becoming more and more that which is portrayed in Revelation. And as Islam came into existance before the USA it would seem fit that it would be mention before the USA. If you study the accounts of the Crusades and compare them to the events in Daniel ten you will find they match percisely. What is the significance of this? I now take you to Daniel 12 verses 11-12.

Remember that I stated "every time prophecy has a distinct start point and every time prohecy has a distinct end point."? The 2300 day prophecy has been completed and it is no longer relevent to today. But, when you look at Daniel 12:11-12 you find that there is a finality to this prophecy. At its conclusion all is said and done, when this prophecy concludes time will be no more. "And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand and two hundred and ninety days. Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand and thirty days. But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest and stand in thy lot at the end of the days."

Notice that there are two events that have to happen before the time clock begins on this prophecy:

1. The daily Sacrifice must be taken away
2. The abomination that maketh desolation must be set up

As SDA we know that the daily sacrifice was spiritually taken away when Jesus was crucified on the cross. It was physically taken away in 70 AD when the Romans distroyed the Temple in Jerusalem. But what of the abomination that maketh desolate? We have been consistantly taught that this was represented by the Banners or Standards of the armies of Rome that were placed around Jerusalem in 70 AD. Ok so let's mark this as our start time for this prophecy.

Add 70 + 1335 (Daniel 12:12 the last time period mentioned)
= 1405 AD. Knowing that the Lord did not enter the sanctuary until 1848 how is it that he would have returned prior to that? He didn't, so the Standards could not have been the abomination mentioned in Daniel. Also, as the Lord has not yet returned in our time the last part of this prophecy still has to be somewhere in the future. So how do we determine when this will be. Is there still an event out there yet to be discovered or occur before we can make this determination?

Notice that all old testement prophecy was given to the Jews through Jewish prophets. These prophecies were mainly directed at the Jews, as adopted Jews they are also now meant for Christians. But still these are Jewish prophecies and must therefore be looked upon from a Jewish perspective. Being such we must take on the mindset of the Jew and ask the question "What in current history would a Jew consider an abomination?" Think about this as I continue.

The history of Islam is a violent and turbulent one. Their goal was and still is, to subjugate all under their rulership, forcing everyone to worship as they worship(ped) or die. They came in direct conflict with the Roman Church, who had the exact same goal. These two powers fought continuously throughout the years known as the Crusades with the Muslims besting the Catholics for the better part of the conflicts, in the end the Muslims gained ultimate control of Jerusalem and held that control until the middle part of the twentieth century. Everywhere that the Muslims went there was distruction, few of the countries that conquered ever recovered. They were laid waste, in most the desolation was complete, many today still suffer the consequences of their terror. They can rightfully be called "the desolaters".

Have you answered the question concerning the abomination yet?

In 688 AD the muslims in Jerusalem built upon the Holy Mount Of God, upon the place that once housed the Temple of God where the sacrifices were conducted, where the Jews worshipped the Most High, the Dome of the Rock. Consider, you are a Jew, is this not an abomination to you? We now have a viable starting point.

But now we have to consider, there are two end points also in the prophecy, each distinct from the other.

Verse 11 --- 1290 days (years)
Verse 12 --- 1335 days (years0

Each end point must have a distinct event that marks that end point.

Now it gets interesting

688 AD + 1290 = 1978

So what distinct event marks this end point?

In 1978 Pope John Paul II became Pope of the Catholic Church, through his direction and leadership he was instrumental in putting fire to and force to many of the Catholic goals. He was the most beloved and influencial Popes in history visiting were no other Pope had visited and assisting in political efforts that would have been considered unthinkable before the turn of the century. The Catholic Church, through his efforts is NOW poissed to regain its once lost granduer.

688 AD + 1335 = 2023

Is this the date in which our Lord will return? Should we ignore this year? Look around you. Have you been watching the news? Are you aware of the agenda of the United Nations and the World Council of Churches? All signs point to the Lord returning soon. Remember, Daniel 12 is the Last Time Prophecy, there are no others and it points to the last day. Here is one more point that I would like to make, perhaps it is only coencidence, but if it is it is a very striking coencidence.

688 AD + 1260 = 1948

Most who are familiar with history will recognize that date a significate for two reasons:

1. It was the year that the United Nations ratified its charter
2. It was the year in which the Nation of Isreal was recognized, first by the United States and then by most of the rest of the world, as a soveirgn nation and the Jews allowed to move back.
3. It was also the European Economic Community formed, later to be known as the European Union.

As I have stated before I have done an extensive amount of research on this. I have been sitting on this for almost two years. I feel that in itself has been too long and I feel compelled to at least present it to others for evaluation and consideration. If I am wrong then I ask for forgiveness in advance, but if I am correct in my assumption then we now, all of us, have a greater responsibility to get the message out. The time is near, we dare not delay.

May God bless and keep you all.
 
Last edited:

EastCoastRemnant

I Must Decrease That He May Increase
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2010
7,665
1,505
Nova Scotia
✟210,609.00
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
First, I just wanted to point out that you mentioned 1848 a couple of times for the date of the fulfillment of the 2300 day prophesy when it was 1844... possible an oversight as you are an Adventist and 1844 is cemented as the date our Lord started the investigative judgement.

While I believe that we will, as God's people, being watchful of events happening, will know when Christs soon appearing will be. I do not believe, that we will know the year... two reasons. The mention that there will be time no more after the 2300 year prophesy and that inspiration tells us the same.

The two time prophesies mentioned, the 1290 and the 1335 do fit within the 2300 day prophesy just as the 1260 does. We need the correct understanding of the 'daily'. The word 'sacrifice' was added by the translators as you can denot by the use of italics. All the pioneers understood the daily to represent paganism, so when the daily or paganism gave way to the papacy or the abomination that makes desolate, this is the start date of this portion of the prophesy...508. Now we know that the Papacy did not get it's power until 538 but the verse says 'set up'. This was an event that happened prior to 538. In 508 Clovis defeated the Visigoths and removed the final stumbleing block for the Papcy to be set up
"Thus in A.D. 508 terminated united resistance to the development of the papacy. The question of supremacy between Frank and Goth, between the Catholic and Arian religions, had then been settled in favor of the Catholics." Daniel and the Revelation, 1944 ed., p. 330.
"Thus when Clovis and the Franks defeated the Arian Visigoths and drove them into Spain, it was also a theological victory for the bishop of Rome." William H. Shea, Bible Amplifier - Daniel 7-12, p. 220.

I will further respond to your post after I get back from biking.... :)
 
Upvote 0

taikachanz

God's Word Stands Alone
Feb 20, 2011
168
0
✟22,788.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
First, I just wanted to point out that you mentioned 1848 a couple of times for the date of the fulfillment of the 2300 day prophesy when it was 1844... possible an oversight as you are an Adventist and 1844 is cemented as the date our Lord started the investigative judgement.

correct, my oversite.. thank you


While I believe that we will, as God's people, being watchful of events happening, will know when Christs soon appearing will be. I do not believe, that we will know the year... two reasons. The mention that there will be time no more after the 2300 year prophesy and that inspiration tells us the same.

if this were true we would not now be here, unless another time is indicated, which I don't believe it is.

The two time prophesies mentioned, the 1290 and the 1335 do fit within the 2300 day prophesy just as the 1260 does. We need the correct understanding of the 'daily'. The word 'sacrifice' was added by the translators as you can denot by the use of italics. All the pioneers understood the daily to represent paganism, so when the daily or paganism gave way to the papacy or the abomination that makes desolate, this is the start date of this portion of the prophesy...508. Now we know that the Papacy did not get it's power until 538 but the verse says 'set up'. This was an event that happened prior to 538. In 508 Clovis defeated the Visigoths and removed the final stumbleing block for the Papcy to be set up

ok, if this were the case then we now have a start point for the final Daniel prophecy so lets calculate

508 AD + 1335 = 1842,, did Christ return in 1842, no it doesn't work. This was the same mistake that William Miller made in his speculation that this would be the period that Christ would return. Mind that his time table was adjusted due to the time clock starting at a certain month of the year, not percisely on Jan, but somewhere between the beginning of the year and the end of the year.


I will further respond to your post after I get back from biking.... :)


looking forward to hearing from you
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

EastCoastRemnant

I Must Decrease That He May Increase
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2010
7,665
1,505
Nova Scotia
✟210,609.00
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
if this were true we would not now be here, unless another time is indicated, which I don't believe it is.

Time being no more is a reference to time prophesy


ok, if this were the case then we now have a start point for the final Daniel prophecy so lets calculate

508 AD + 1335 = 1842,, did Christ return in 1842, no it doesn't work. This was the same mistake that William Miller made in his speculation that this would be the period that Christ would return. Mind that his time table was adjusted due to the time clock starting at a certain month of the year, not percisely on Jan, but somewhere between the beginning of the year and the end of the year.

508 + 1335 =1843... the reference to this time prophesy was that 'blessed is he who waiteth and comes to the 1335'. All this is denoting, to me, is that this time in history was special for the resurgence of deep interest in Bible prophesy and the searching of hearts and putting away of sins, waiting for the Lord to come... this indeed was a blessed time.







looking forward to hearing from you[/quote]
 
Upvote 0

taikachanz

God's Word Stands Alone
Feb 20, 2011
168
0
✟22,788.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Time being no more is a reference to time prophesy

508 + 1335 =1843... the reference to this time prophesy was that 'blessed is he who waiteth and comes to the 1335'. All this is denoting, to me, is that this time in history was special for the resurgence of deep interest in Bible prophesy and the searching of hearts and putting away of sins, waiting for the Lord to come... this indeed was a blessed time.


I have searched through all of EGW's writings, no where have I found any reference by her concerning Daniel 12:11-12, why? Yes, it is true that the early founders of the SDA did include this prophecy into the 2300 days prophecy, however, where they right? Remember, must of what they believed was gleaned from William Miller's studies. Was he right in the event that was to occur? No, he was correct in calculating an event, but not the ultimate event.

Notice also the time period between when the 2300 day prophecy was given and when the last prophecy was given. My contention is that these are two seperate prophecies, neither having to do with the other, each starting at different points and each ending at different points. Afterall, didn't God give Daniel the visions in chapters 2,7 and 9 of the entire world history up until the second coming of Christ? If that is the case, why would he not give Daniel the timetables for all these events as well? It is like our God to do this. Don't get me wrong, I don't presume to know the mind of God, however, His past actions support this hypothesis.

I don't believe God gave EGW all the information that He had. What he gave her was what was necessary at that time, what she called "Present Truth". She also indicated that in the future more truth would be revealed and that truth would then become "Present Truth." Purhaps what we are now discussing is that "Present Truth". But, unless we agree to thuroughly study this from all angles we cannot determine if it is or not. To cast it aside because our present doctrine does not agree with it is would be repeating the samething christiandom did during the Millerite movement. I for one do not want to be in that type of camp, do you?
 
Upvote 0

EastCoastRemnant

I Must Decrease That He May Increase
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2010
7,665
1,505
Nova Scotia
✟210,609.00
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I have searched through all of EGW's writings, no where have I found any reference by her concerning Daniel 12:11-12, why? Yes, it is true that the early founders of the SDA did include this prophecy into the 2300 days prophecy, however, where they right? Remember, must of what they believed was gleaned from William Miller's studies. Was he right in the event that was to occur? No, he was correct in calculating an event, but not the ultimate event.

Notice also the time period between when the 2300 day prophecy was given and when the last prophecy was given. My contention is that these are two seperate prophecies, neither having to do with the other, each starting at different points and each ending at different points. Afterall, didn't God give Daniel the visions in chapters 2,7 and 9 of the entire world history up until the second coming of Christ? If that is the case, why would he not give Daniel the timetables for all these events as well? It is like our God to do this. Don't get me wrong, I don't presume to know the mind of God, however, His past actions support this hypothesis.

I don't believe God gave EGW all the information that He had. What he gave her was what was necessary at that time, what she called "Present Truth". She also indicated that in the future more truth would be revealed and that truth would then become "Present Truth." Purhaps what we are now discussing is that "Present Truth". But, unless we agree to thuroughly study this from all angles we cannot determine if it is or not. To cast it aside because our present doctrine does not agree with it is would be repeating the samething christiandom did during the Millerite movement. I for one do not want to be in that type of camp, do you?


I agree that there will be more light given in our day and in another post, I will attempt to outline what some diligent students of prophesy have discovered concerning the 7th trumpet , the third woe and how they believe it has been fulfilled.

I wanted to give you a sister White quote from Early Writings that shows that what Miller and his associates were teaching was indeed correct (except of course their reason of 1844) and how she stated that time setting would be no more.

The supplied remarks in brackets are from the White Estates as I got this from the EG White Study CD but the meaning is self explanatory anyway...

I have seen that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, and that it should not be altered; that the figures were as He wanted them; that His hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until His hand was removed. [THIS APPLIES TO THE CHART USED DURING THE 1843 MOVEMENT, AND HAS SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE CALCULATION OF THE PROPHETIC PERIODS AS IT APPEARED ON THAT CHART. THE NEXT SENTENCE EXPLAINS THAT THERE WAS AN INACCURACY WHICH IN THE PROVIDENCE OF GOD WAS SUFFERED TO EXIST. BUT THIS DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE PUBLICATION OF A CHART SUBSEQUENTLY WHICH WOULD CORRECT THE MISTAKE, AFTER THE 1843 MOVEMENT WAS PAST, AND THE CALCULATION AS THEN MADE HAD SERVED ITS PURPOSE.] {EW 74.1}

Then I saw in relation to the "daily" (Daniel 8:12) that the word "sacrifice" was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text, and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the
75
judgment hour cry. When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the "daily"; but in the confusion since 1844, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion have followed. Time has not been a test since 1844, and it will never again be a test. {EW 74.2}
 
Upvote 0

taikachanz

God's Word Stands Alone
Feb 20, 2011
168
0
✟22,788.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I agree that there will be more light given in our day and in another post, I will attempt to outline what some diligent students of prophesy have discovered concerning the 7th trumpet , the third woe and how they believe it has been fulfilled.

I wanted to give you a sister White quote from Early Writings that shows that what Miller and his associates were teaching was indeed correct (except of course their reason of 1844) and how she stated that time setting would be no more.

The supplied remarks in brackets are from the White Estates as I got this from the EG White Study CD but the meaning is self explanatory anyway...

I'm in not, at this time, now convinced that Sister White was intirely correct, after all she wouldn't have been the first "prophet" to have made a mistake in judgement due to personal opinion (see 2 Samuel 7).
I have seen that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, and that it should not be altered; that the figures were as He wanted them; that His hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until His hand was removed. [THIS APPLIES TO THE CHART USED DURING THE 1843 MOVEMENT, AND HAS SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE CALCULATION OF THE PROPHETIC PERIODS AS IT APPEARED ON THAT CHART. THE NEXT SENTENCE EXPLAINS THAT THERE WAS AN INACCURACY WHICH IN THE PROVIDENCE OF GOD WAS SUFFERED TO EXIST. BUT THIS DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE PUBLICATION OF A CHART SUBSEQUENTLY WHICH WOULD CORRECT THE MISTAKE, AFTER THE 1843 MOVEMENT WAS PAST, AND THE CALCULATION AS THEN MADE HAD SERVED ITS PURPOSE.] {EW 74.1}

Then I saw in relation to the "daily" (Daniel 8:12) that the word "sacrifice" was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text, and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the
75
judgment hour cry. When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the "daily"; but in the confusion since 1844, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion have followed. Time has not been a test since 1844, and it will never again be a test. {EW 74.2}

In the following post is a document by Brother J. N. LOUGHBOROUGH concerning the said chart. I have inserted comments along the way to explain my position on this. I hope that any who read this will also take sometime to research this for themselves as I have done, prayerfully and thoughtfully. I mean no disrespect for anybody nor for what one may believe concerning this issue. But, if we are to continue to grow we must be open about these issues and not be so ridged in our doctrine that we are not open to change. The Lord has been directing change in His people since before Martin Luther, why should he stop now?



 
Upvote 0

taikachanz

God's Word Stands Alone
Feb 20, 2011
168
0
✟22,788.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Continued from previous post



84. Takoma Park Station, Washington, D.C., April 4, 1907 No.14


Page 9 and 10.


The Thirteen Hundred and


Thirty-Five Days


J. N. LOUGHBOROUGH

“AND from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up [“to set up the abomination,” margin], there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days. Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days. But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest, and stand in thy lot at the end of the days.” Dan. 12: 11-13.
In the above language there is presented to us a reckoning of time from one event to another. (The author here skips over the fact that there are two events that launch this prophecy, both must be in play for the prophecy to commence.) The first event is called the “taking away of the daily, sacri­fice;” the last is “the end of the days.” This end of the days (prophetic days) must be the end of the twenty three hundred days, (This is an faulty assumption on the part of the author working from previously faulty research.) for that period comes down the farthest of any of the periods mentioned to Daniel—reaching to Oct. 22, 1844. (The twenty three hundred days is NOT the farthest of any of the periods mentioned, it may be the longest, but the prophecy in Daniel 12 reaches beyond the twenty three hundred day prophecy.) So when we came to that point of time, it could be said truthfully, “the end of the days.” (The “end of days” in NOT the end of a the twenty three hundred day time prophecy, IT IS THE END OF HUMAN HISTORY AS WE KNOW IT. This is indicated when the angel of the Lord tells Daniel “But go thou thy way till the end be:”Note that the angel did not say till the “end of days” but “till the end” equating the end with the end of days, meaning the final day of human history when the Lord will return. Further “for thou shalt rest, and stand in thy lot at the end of days.” As far as I can tell Daniel has not yet “stood in his lot.” That being the case the “end of days” has not yet occurred. It was then that we came to the antitype of the cleansing of the sanctuary in the Jewish service, when the lot was cast upon the two goats. Lev. 16: 8-10. So here it is said Daniel would stand in his lot—be in the real investigative judgment of the Lord’s people. (Again, this is wholly speculative, to agree with this we must conclude that Daniel was resurrected at some point during the period mentioned so that he could participate in the investigative judgment. I find this to be unbiblical, even in an Adventist point of view.) The word Gohrahl—lot, which the Hebrew lexicon says occurs seventy-six times in the Old Testament, is the same word in Dan. 12: 13 as in Lev. 16: 8, 9, 10. This is additional proof that “the end of the days” here mentioned is the end of the two thousand and three hundred days when the sanctuary was to be cleansed.
Now as we see what event marks the close of the time reckoning of Daniel, chapter twelve, it is proper to inquire, What event marked the beginning of the reckoning? It seems from the language used that it is a definite date from which time could be reckoned, for it says, “From the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away,” showing clearly that it is some event that is so definite that one can reckon time from it. Thus we are brought directly to the question, What is meant by the term “daily sacrifice”? and what is meant by the “taking a way” of the daily sacrifice ? (I find it interesting that we as Adventist are taught that Christ took away the spiritual daily sacrifice when he was crucified and the Romans took the physical sacrifice away when they destroyed the temple and Jerusalem in AD 70 but when it comes to this prophecy the story is changed. Sorry, it doesn’t wash.)
In “Early Writings,” page 74, we read: “I saw in relation to the ‘daily’ (Dan. 8: 12), that the word ‘sacrifice’ was supplied by man’s wisdom, and does not belong to the text; and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment-hour cry. When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the ‘daily;’ but in the confusion since 1844, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion have followed.”
On the same page we read: “I have seen that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, and that it should not be altered; that the figures were as he wanted them; that his hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until his hand was removed.” This mistake related to the supposition that the 2300 days ended in the spring of 1844, instead of the tenth day of the seventh Jewish month—Oct. 22, 1844—as was afterward clearly dem­onstrated.

In view of the above statements in “Early Writings” many letters have been written to me, inquiring, “What was the position taken on the ‘daily’ by those who gave the message prior to and during 1844?” My reply is this: They claimed that the word” sacrifice” was a supplied word, and that the word “daily” meant continual, and referred to that which had continually—all along—warred against the work of God, and that it was paganism. (Again, this is a faulty view. It contributed to the misunderstanding of the event of 1944 yet it is being clung to tenaciously. We must remember to whom the prophecies of Daniel were first intended and let the Bible give us the proper interpretation. Daily does refer to the daily sacrifices that were conducted in the temple, it was for this reason combined with others that Daniel was assured that the Temple of God and Jerusalem would once again be restored.)
They said, “This is something that ‘hindered’ the ‘setting up’—granting of civ­il power to the papacy.” (This is what would be considered an oxymoron. Destroying paganism to implement pagan worship. Again, Adventists are taught that the three races that were destroyed by Rome were true followers of Christ, how then could they be pagan if this were true?) They connected this text in Daniel with Paul’s statement in 2 Thess. 2: 7, 8: “For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth [hindereth] will let [hinder] until he be taken out of the way. And then shall that Wicked be revealed.” (This has nothing to do with Daniel’s prophecies. Paul is teaching for his time and warning Christians of things to come, admonishing them to be aware of what is going on around them concerning false teachers that have already entered the church.) Continuing, they reasoned thus: Paganism was the religion of the Roman empire, established by law of the empire. The papacy could not get that power while it was held by paganism. In 508 the pagan religion was abolished as the religion of the empire. Now he that had hindered was “taken out of the way,” and “that wicked “—the papacy—could be “set up.” (Sorry, doesn’t wash here either. EGW writes in The Great Controversy that the church compromised with the Romans and altered its belief structure in such a manner that Paganism eventually took over the church and THEN the church took over the Roman Empire, in essence the Church was already pagan when it began to assert its influence.)
On the chart, which “Early Writings” declares was correct; (Yes, the chart is correct in relation to the twenty three hundred day, it is not in relation to Daniel 12.) and especially states that it was correct in the interpretation of “the daily,” we have a column of time reckoning which reads (I quote from one of those charts which lies be­fore me): “508—Taking away of the daily sacrifice. (Again, Adventists must get their story straight here, either Jesus took the daily away when he was crucified or it was taken away here in 508 AD. Personally, I’ll give the credit to Christ in accordance with Daniel 9:27 “And he (Christ) shall confirm the covenant with many for one week and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading (preparing) of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate”) Dan. 12: 11, 12,” Again: “538—The Heruli, Vandals, and Ostrogoths by this time were plucked up: this is the prophetic period, for the rise of the little horn. See Dan, 7: 8. Three horns plucked up, and the little horn rises, which is the commencement of the papal power. The commencement of the time, times, and a half, or 1260 years, terminat­ing in 1798.”
A little farther down the column we read: “The 1290 years (Dan. 12: 11), com­mencing 508, at the taking away of the dally sacrifice, terminate 1798, from which period 45 years completes the 1335 years, when Daniel is to stand in his lot, at the end of the days. The 1335 from the taking away of the daily (508) and the 45 from the close of 1290 terminate together 1843.” Bear in mind that the 1843 occurring frequently on the chart was 1843 Jewish reckoning, which they supposed would be April of 1844 of our reckoning of time. That which was discovered when the “hand of God was removed” was that the periods, especially the 2300 days; termi­nated Oct 22, 1844, which was the tenth day of the seventh Jewish month of that year, instead of April, the close of the Jewish 1843. (We object when others rip the last seven years of the 70 week prophecy and cast it somewhere into the future to be activated in some unknown time period, but we do no object when two separate prophecies are forced together as these are. These prophecies ARE two distinct prophecies and, although this one begins in the
The “confusion” that came in after the termination of the 2300 days was first among those who persisted in setting times for the Lord to come. They claimed that the “daily sacrifice” meant the Jewish daily offerings. That certainly made “confusion” in what were the clear views before. As we have seen, the taking away of the daily is a definite point of time from which the 1290 and 1335 days, etc., could be computed. The Jewish sacrifices met their antitypical object when Christ expired on the cross, the true offering for the sins of mankind—when “the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom.” Matt. 27: 51. Those who came in with this “confusion” found no event to which either the 1290 or 1335 years would reach, beginning them at the crucifixion of Christ, neither did they attempt it. (The mistake that was made was that they neglected to include the second event that was needed to start the count down, that event was the setting up of the Abomination of Desolation, the Dome of the Rock on the Temple Mount.)
Next they said the taking away of the daily was at the destruction of Jerusalem, and the complete overthrow of the Jewish sacrifices, A. D. 70, Adding the other periods to A. D. 70 did not bring conclusions any more clear than their previous “confusion” of the dates. (Again, without including the second requirement for the start of the countdown this prophecy could not commence.)

Continued on next post
 
Upvote 0

taikachanz

God's Word Stands Alone
Feb 20, 2011
168
0
✟22,788.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Continued from previous post


Still later the position was taken that the “daily” which was taken away re­ferred to the “continual” offering of Christ in our behalf. We might inquire, If the offering of Christ is to be a “continual offering” for the gospel age, when was it ever taken away, “seeing he ever liveth to make intercession” for us?”, Hebrews 7:25. Those reasoning from that premise said, “The papacy could not come to its ascendancy, and enforce the doctrine of the intercession of the Virgin Mary and all the saints, until in the minds of the people they had led them away from the real virtue of Christ’s offering in their behalf.”
It is, of course, a matter of fact that with those engaged in establishing the theory of human mediation there was a loss of faith, more or less, in the offering of Christ. That loss of faith must have been a gradual work, and not a definite date from which to reckon the 1290 and 1335 days, etc. God had in that very time of apostasy his faithful “Antipas”—believers in Christ—(Rev. 2: 13) who held fast their faith though they might be martyred therefore. So the continual offering of Christ did not cease because some persons were letting go the same. These “held fast” his “name,” and did not “deny” his “faith.”
Again: let us remember that this departure from the faith—this “mystery of iniquity”—was already working in the days of Paul, and that its development was by a gradual process, while the taking away of the “daily” introduced in the prophecy is at a definite “time,” and is a definite act, from which date the 1290 and 1335 years, etc., can be reckoned. (Not without including the setting up of the Abomination that maketh desolate.)
We repeat that the “mystery of iniquity” that aimed at getting the civil power to enforce its peculiar tenets, could not do so while paganism was the legally appointed religion of the empire, but when, in 508 A. D., that ceased to be the es­tablished religion, the designs of the “mystery” worker could be carried out. (Paganism never ceased to be the religion of Rome, it was the same religious form only under the guise of a false Christianity.) From 508 to 538 A. D. the papacy succeeded in being “set up,” and now “the abomi­nation of desolation” might go on in its work, no longer “let”—hindered—by paganism. (How can paganism hinder paganism?)
In the year 1892 while I was conducting a service in Detroit, Mich., a person was in attendance who, although then a merchant in the city, had been educated as a Jewish rabbi. He was well posted in Hebrew. At the close of the service I asked him what he understood by the “daily” in Daniel 12. He at once replied: “O, that means continual.” “What,” said I, “something that was to continue?” “O, no!” said he, “something that had continued all the way along to oppose the work of God on earth.” I inquired, “What was that?” His ready response was, “It was paganism.” (It would have been nice to have had some way to confirm this, hearsay isn’t a very reliable source.”
I submit these thoughts on the “daily” as they may help other minds, as well as those who have already received answers to letters written in reference to the matter.
Mountain View, Cal.
 
Upvote 0

EastCoastRemnant

I Must Decrease That He May Increase
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2010
7,665
1,505
Nova Scotia
✟210,609.00
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
There's a lot to respond to in your posts. Personally, when sister White says 'I was shown' then I put 100% of my faith that this was divinely inspired. The re are other aspects of her writings that I suspect as opinions and while having good council, are not a 'thus saith the Lord.

I think, from reading your red ink, that you are having difficulty seeing the distinction between pagan Rome and Papal Rome. Paganism was the ruling influence in the Roman empire with the worship of every manner of diety but Papal Rome, while having some pagan tints, was primarily premised on the Bible and the teachings of Christ. Not saying a correct interpretation but based on the Bible none-the-less.

The same comparison can be made today between Communist China and the USA. They appear, on the surface to be polar opposites, however, the current President was mentored and trained in marxist communism. So really as history looks back, there will be very .little difference seen between the two except the window dressing. One is covert, the other overt.
 
Upvote 0

taikachanz

God's Word Stands Alone
Feb 20, 2011
168
0
✟22,788.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
There's a lot to respond to in your posts. Personally, when sister White says 'I was shown' then I put 100% of my faith that this was divinely inspired. The re are other aspects of her writings that I suspect as opinions and while having good council, are not a 'thus saith the Lord.

In actuality, I am doing what EGW demanded we all do, test what she had to say against the Word of God. I am not saying that what she has stated is now what she perceived, but remember, at the time she wrote what she did, she was still fairly young and there were many many influencial people around her spouting the same opinions concerning these prophecies. Youth and inexprience sometimes play a part in how we think. I'm not saying that it happened, put I am saying that it is possible. I hope that you at least have gone through and at least perused what I posted.

I think, from reading your red ink, that you are having difficulty seeing the distinction between pagan Rome and Papal Rome. Paganism was the ruling influence in the Roman empire with the worship of every manner of diety but Papal Rome, while having some pagan tints, was primarily premised on the Bible and the teachings of Christ. Not saying a correct interpretation but based on the Bible none-the-less.

"A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump." There is no such things as a little paganism, either one is pagan or one is not. According to EGW in Great Controversy there really wasn't any difference between Pagan Rome and Papal Rome, only the names were changed (to protect the innocent? :confused:)

The same comparison can be made today between Communist China and the USA. They appear, on the surface to be polar opposites, however, the current President was mentored and trained in marxist communism. So really as history looks back, there will be very little difference seen between the two except the window dressing. One is covert, the other overt.

Never heard that, but it wouldn't surprise me. Heck, the way things are going it wouldn't suprise me to find out he's a closet Jesuit.

Here's something else concerning the "daily" I just discovered watching an old Walter Veith video. It's in Daniel 8 starting were the goat with the prominent horn makes it's appearance. We know through study that this is Greece with Alexander represented by the horn. As we read on we come to verse 12 "And an host was given him against the daily sacrifice by resason of transgression, and it cast down the truth to the ground; and it practised, and prospered." As this is integrated within the part of the prophecy that is concered with Greece then this has part has to be maintained with Greece. So I ask you, when in history could this have been fulfilled. Think? The preterists say that he was the Antichrist because of his actions during his reign in Greece. If you said Antiocus Apiphines (sp) then you would be correct. And what was it that he did. According to the Maccebeens he made the Jews stop sacrificing, took over the Temple of God and sacrificed a pig upon the alter. Now, if this part of the prophecy concerning Greece was fulfilled by Antiocus then the daily mentioned here must be the same as the daily mentioned in chapter 12, reason being is that the Bible is consistant in its language when dealing with prophecy. Therefore, the daily cannot be paganism as it was first thought and as it is portrayed in the prophetic chart.

As I do this things become clearer and I become more convinced I'm on the right track.
 
Upvote 0

EastCoastRemnant

I Must Decrease That He May Increase
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2010
7,665
1,505
Nova Scotia
✟210,609.00
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
As I do this things become clearer and I become more convinced I'm on the right track.

Sorry brother, I don't see it the same as you do... I'll stick to the pioneers understanding and the SOP.

Why would God now after 150 years, reveal something that would destroy our previous understanding... be careful, God is not the author of confusion.
 
Upvote 0
O

OntheDL

Guest
Hi Taikachanz,

Please read Rev 10 in the context of the 1844 Great Disappointment. So indeed 1843 was a sweet year. We need to know prior to the period from the Lisbon earthquake of 1755 to 1844, the Christiandom didn't consider the return of Christ imminent. The Millerites correctly determined the date of cleansing of the sanctuary, but God hadn't revealed to them the full interpretation of the cleansing. So they associated the date with the return of Jesus to cleanse the earth.

So 1843 and 1844 were sweet years in the mouth, but bitter in the belly. God used this (the great disappointment similar to the disappointment after the crucifixion) to determine the remnant. The remnant was told in Rev 11 to measure the temple. Thus the sanctuary doctrine was revealed to the remnant to become the foundation of their message for the last days.

Rev 10 tells us there was time no longer. All the prophetic time finished at 1844. All the prophecies time period focused on a period from 1755 to 1844. Time prophecies are search lights that shine lights on the personage of Jesus. They tell us what Jesus is doing in the heavenly sanctuary.

September 23, the Lord showed me that He had stretched out His hand the second time to recover the remnant of His people, [SEE PAGE 86.] and that efforts must be redoubled in this gathering time. In the scattering, Israel was smitten and torn, but now in the gathering time God will heal and bind up His people. In the scattering, efforts made to spread the truth had but little effect, accomplished but little or nothing; but in the gathering, when God has set His hand to gather His people, efforts to spread the truth will have their designed effect. All should be united and zealous in the work. I saw that it was wrong for any to refer to the scattering for examples to govern us now in the gathering; for if God should do no more for us now than He did then, Israel would never be gathered. I have seen that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, and that it should not be altered; that the figures were as He wanted them; that His hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until His hand was removed. {EW 74.1}

Please look up the 1843 chart and the corrected 1850 chart.

2 Chronicles 20:20 ... Believe in the LORD your God, so shall ye be established; believe his prophets, so shall ye prosper.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
O

OntheDL

Guest
For the last three years I have been studying exclusively Daniels prophecies and some of the NW scriptures used to refute the practice of date setting. Using a Stong's Exhaustive Concordence I have discovered a very interesting overlooked aspect of the main verse used to refute the practice. Matt. 24:36 "But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no no the angels of heaven, but my Father only." KJV The key word here is "knoweth". Upon researching this word I discovered that it is from the Greek "eido" "used only in certian past tenses." the definition goes on to explain that other uses of "knoweth" are borrowed from this original yet they are from different words meaning different senses. In other words this scripture could have easily been translated as "But of that day and hour hath no man known the day or the hour." Giving this scripture an entirely different meaning.

Other scriptures, as well, the support of, at least, looking and paying attentiion the signs and indications of that day and hour. God, in Amos promises to inform his prophets as to his actions, would he not also do this near the time of the end? What of Joel when he stated that he would pour out his spirit upon his followers and "old men will dream dreams and young men will see visions?" If we are to believe that God's promises are true would he not give us the means as to determine the "proximity" of that time so that we may better prepare us for that returm the closer it gets? Isn't that what he did with William Miller and the Millerite movement? Even though they wrongly determined the event, the event that was predicted happened and the time prophecy that was involved WAS COMPLETED as was foretold and revealed by William Miller. Can and will this happen again. I believe it will and I will go as far to say that I believe it HAS.

William Miller in his researching the prophecies of Daniel and Revelation and his thurough study of the Bible develop some simple rules that we as Adventist follow today in our daily studies and the first and foremost of these is that we are to let the Bible interpret itself. When there is a question, especially a hard question, we are to search the scriptures for the answer and not go to anyother source for these other sources outside the Bible many times prove to be faulty, nor matter the source. One thing that Miller did not include in has research study facts was this truth that has been overlooked by everyone it seems, Every time prophecy has a distinct start point and every time prophecy has a distinct end point. Knowing this, if we can determine a start point of a time prophecy the end of that prophecy can also be determined. This is a fact that cannot be disputed no matter how hard one tries. It's like say, "I'm going from point A to point B on an unobstructed road, I am the only one going and no one else will be on that road and it will take me this amount of time to get there." and someone saying "no, it won't happen." It will happen, and God has built the road and set the action in motion and nobody, not even Satan can stop it, no matter how hard he may try.

So now you ask, "what is this guy talking about?" Patience, I'm getting there. William Miller dissected the 2300 days (years) prophecy and correctly concluded that a major Biblical event was going to occur in 1847 or 1848. Believing it was the return of Christ he sounded the joyous news throughout the country. At the same time, across the oceans, others had come to the same conclusion independently of Miller. Research it for yourselves, it happened. God had given the message to many of his faithful, not just Miller, though Miller was credited with discovering the truth first. But, although the event was wrongly predicted, the time was not. This in essence was a "Time Setting" event. Do we now condemn William Miller and the others for "Time Setting", supposedly in disobedience to Jesus's assumed admonition against doing such a thing? Heaven forbid, for without this event we as SDA would not now exist and God's remnent church would still be scattered hither and yon.

We forget that Satan hates the idea that Jesus is returning soon and he would do all that he could to disuade us for studying and allowing the Holy Spirit in directing us to the truth of the prophecies. He has, and will, use well meaning Christian to misdirect Christ's church in to false belief and delude many into false speculation, without thurough study of the prophecies and history as well so that the faithful are discouraged and made to say, "the Lord is not near, he will not return in my time for I cannot determine the time of my Lord's return." Thus has been the reaction of mean in the past 150+ years of not only SDA but of others who seek the Lord as well. But we need not be discouraged because the Lord has given us all the knowledge we need and the wherewithal to use that knowledge.

Miller and those that supported him showed that the historicist view of prophecy was the correct way of interpreting prophetic events. But, when the Lord did not appear as expected those who ridiculed Miller turned from this form of exsigesis and turn instead to other means of prophetic interpretation, much to the delight of Satan. But we as SDA continue to hold to this form and correctly so. And now, I turn to history to explain further where I go with this.

History has showng us, through prophecy, who the woman is that sits on the beast in Revelation. It has also shown us who the false prophet shall be and the "lamb with two horns". We have however in correctly determined who the figures are in Daniel 10. In my studies and research I came across several books relating to the Crusades, the RCC and Islam. I know that today many are espousing that Islam is the Antichrist but we know this to be false, however, as with the USA, Islam has played a major role in the history of the world, not only in a religious sense but in a political sense as well. This being said, we must realize that it must play a part somewhere in bible prophecy. If we deny this concerning such a major force than we must also deny this concerning the USA. But we know this not to be the case, for when we look at current events we see more and more that the USA is becoming more and more that which is portrayed in Revelation. And as Islam came into existance before the USA it would seem fit that it would be mention before the USA. If you study the accounts of the Crusades and compare them to the events in Daniel ten you will find they match percisely. What is the significance of this? I now take you to Daniel 12 verses 11-12.

Remember that I stated "every time prophecy has a distinct start point and every time prohecy has a distinct end point."? The 2300 day prophecy has been completed and it is no longer relevent to today. But, when you look at Daniel 12:11-12 you find that there is a finality to this prophecy. At its conclusion all is said and done, when this prophecy concludes time will be no more. "And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand and two hundred and ninety days. Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand and thirty days. But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest and stand in thy lot at the end of the days."

Notice that there are two events that have to happen before the time clock begins on this prophecy:

1. The daily Sacrifice must be taken away
2. The abomination that maketh desolation must be set up

As SDA we know that the daily sacrifice was spiritually taken away when Jesus was crucified on the cross. It was physically taken away in 70 AD when the Romans distroyed the Temple in Jerusalem. But what of the abomination that maketh desolate? We have been consistantly taught that this was represented by the Banners or Standards of the armies of Rome that were placed around Jerusalem in 70 AD. Ok so let's mark this as our start time for this prophecy.

Add 70 + 1335 (Daniel 12:12 the last time period mentioned)
= 1405 AD. Knowing that the Lord did not enter the sanctuary until 1848 how is it that he would have returned prior to that? He didn't, so the Standards could not have been the abomination mentioned in Daniel. Also, as the Lord has not yet returned in our time the last part of this prophecy still has to be somewhere in the future. So how do we determine when this will be. Is there still an event out there yet to be discovered or occur before we can make this determination?

Notice that all old testement prophecy was given to the Jews through Jewish prophets. These prophecies were mainly directed at the Jews, as adopted Jews they are also now meant for Christians. But still these are Jewish prophecies and must therefore be looked upon from a Jewish perspective. Being such we must take on the mindset of the Jew and ask the question "What in current history would a Jew consider an abomination?" Think about this as I continue.

The history of Islam is a violent and turbulent one. Their goal was and still is, to subjugate all under their rulership, forcing everyone to worship as they worship(ped) or die. They came in direct conflict with the Roman Church, who had the exact same goal. These two powers fought continuously throughout the years known as the Crusades with the Muslims besting the Catholics for the better part of the conflicts, in the end the Muslims gained ultimate control of Jerusalem and held that control until the middle part of the twentieth century. Everywhere that the Muslims went there was distruction, few of the countries that conquered ever recovered. They were laid waste, in most the desolation was complete, many today still suffer the consequences of their terror. They can rightfully be called "the desolaters".

Have you answered the question concerning the abomination yet?

In 688 AD the muslims in Jerusalem built upon the Holy Mount Of God, upon the place that once housed the Temple of God where the sacrifices were conducted, where the Jews worshipped the Most High, the Dome of the Rock. Consider, you are a Jew, is this not an abomination to you? We now have a viable starting point.

But now we have to consider, there are two end points also in the prophecy, each distinct from the other.

Verse 11 --- 1290 days (years)
Verse 12 --- 1335 days (years0

Each end point must have a distinct event that marks that end point.

Now it gets interesting

688 AD + 1290 = 1978

So what distinct event marks this end point?

In 1978 Pope John Paul II became Pope of the Catholic Church, through his direction and leadership he was instrumental in putting fire to and force to many of the Catholic goals. He was the most beloved and influencial Popes in history visiting were no other Pope had visited and assisting in political efforts that would have been considered unthinkable before the turn of the century. The Catholic Church, through his efforts is NOW poissed to regain its once lost granduer.

688 AD + 1335 = 2023

Is this the date in which our Lord will return? Should we ignore this year? Look around you. Have you been watching the news? Are you aware of the agenda of the United Nations and the World Council of Churches? All signs point to the Lord returning soon. Remember, Daniel 12 is the Last Time Prophecy, there are no others and it points to the last day. Here is one more point that I would like to make, perhaps it is only coencidence, but if it is it is a very striking coencidence.

688 AD + 1260 = 1948

Most who are familiar with history will recognize that date a significate for two reasons:

1. It was the year that the United Nations was formed
2. It was the year in which the Nation of Isreal was recognized, first by the United States and then by most of the rest of the world, as a soveirgn nation and the Jews allowed to move back.


As I have stated before I have done an extensive amount of research on this. I have been sitting on this for almost two years. I feel that in itself has been too long and I feel compelled to at least present it to others for evaluation and consideration. If I am wrong then I ask for forgiveness in advance, but if I am correct in my assumption then we now, all of us, have a greater responsibility to get the message out. The time is near, we dare not delay.

May God bless and keep you all.

First of all, 'The daily was taken away'. This is in the context with the little horn power. In the context, it refers to how the papacy was able to take the prerogatives of Jesus and use tradition and substitutes to 'take away' what Jesus has done and what Jesus was doing in the heavenly sanctuary. This is not connected to Christ's sacrifice on the cross.

Thus 508AD the year when the Arian powers began to be rooted out by the papal power was correctly chosen as the starting point of 1290 and 1335 day prophecies.

Secondly, in 688AD, Israel was no longer the chosen people of God. It had ceased to be so after 34AD. So whatever happened then (in 688) and there (in Jerusalem) could not have anything to do with the prophecy. I find it interested that your interpretation ends 1948. This is the deceptive futuricist interpretation.

Again all prophetic time ended at 1844. They focus on the last phase of the atonement. We have no prophetic time message beyond this last work.
 
Upvote 0

taikachanz

God's Word Stands Alone
Feb 20, 2011
168
0
✟22,788.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
First of all, 'The daily was taken away'. This is in the context with the little horn power. In the context, it refers to how the papacy was able to take the prerogatives of Jesus and use tradition and substitutes to 'take away' what Jesus has done and what Jesus was doing in the heavenly sanctuary. This is not connected to Christ's sacrifice on the cross.

Now that's a new explanation to me. They way I understand it there a two views, as I explained before. The foundation of the first is that the "daily" was akin to paganism and that the three little horns that were plucked out were hindering Rome from expanding due to that paganism. My question concerning this is, how does paganism get rid of paganism? After all, in the Great Controversy EGW tells us that the Roman Church was inflitrated by pagans and became corrupted prior to the event mentioned. The second is easier still, and you can find this on vertually ALL sermons on cassete tape, VCR, CD or DVD, even posted on the internet wherein it is specifically stated that the daily, which is taught represents the daily sacrifice, was taken away by Christ. Which is it? Personally, I take the second view.

Thus 508AD the year when the Arian powers began to be rooted out by the papal power was correctly chosen as the starting point of 1290 and 1335 day prophecies.

This is the same conclusion that Miller took and was accepted by his followers. But, and I am not tell anybody to outright discard this, however, neither am I going to accept an outright refusal to at least have a thurough study of this, WITH OUT PREJUDICE. Remember this is exactly what many of the churches did in Miller's time.

Both dates of 1843 and 1844 were used to say that Christ was returning respectively. When he didn't return in 1843 the date was set to 1844. The 1844 date was reset using the 2300 day prophecy and adjusted from the month stated relating to Atexerxes' (sp) decree. This same adjustment could not have been applied to the 1290 & 1335 prophecy. Therefore the 1290 & 1335 prophecy still ended in 1843, a year shown to be insignificant and therefore this prophecy could not have been completed at that time.

Secondly, in 688AD, Israel was no longer the chosen people of God. It had ceased to be so after 34AD. So whatever happened then (in 688) and there (in Jerusalem) could not have anything to do with the prophecy. I find it interested that your interpretation ends 1948. This is the deceptive futuricist interpretation.

You're wrong, WE ARE ISREAL. We accept Christ as our savior and thus we have become the seed of Abraham. "He is not a Jew who is one outwardly, but he is a Jew who is on inwardly."

That being said, you need to remember something everyone seems to forget when they read the prophecies in the OT, these were given to the world through Isreal of OT times and it is through Isreal of that time that we have to view the prophecies. If, as I have said and been taught, Jesus took away the "daily", which was the sacrifices because he became the ultimate and final sacrifice, then the daily through out prophetic scripture must remain the same consistantly. That being the case Daniel 12:11-12's "daily" must be that sacrifice as well as that "daily" in Daniel 8:12 and any other 'daily" that is mentioned prophectically throughout the scriptures. Also, there was only one Holy Place at that time and that was located within the Temple of God, which, when Daniel heard this, would be rebuilt when the decree went out to rebuild Jerusalem. Notice also when the "daily" would be taken away in chapter 8, it is during the introduction of the Greek empire, not after the introduction or during the introduction of the Roman power or the Beast power. Look at it carefully, a horn comes up out of the 4 horns of the Ram which means the power that takes away the daily comes out of the Greek empire. This is the way similar prophecies are interpretted so way change the form? I point to the llittle horn that cames up out of the Beast with the ten horns. We know this beast to be Rome and the little horn to be the apostate church, but if you apply the the same form to this prophecy as that of Daniel 8 then the little horn could be any such nation we choose to fit our needs.



Again all prophetic time ended at 1844. They focus on the last phase of the atonement. We have no prophetic time message beyond this last work.

That is assuming you continue to adhere to the problem that the 1290-1335 days prophecy ended in 1843 without adjustment in opposition to the 2300 days prophecy.

Let's consider this, Adventist rightly teach a historic view of prophecy. On the otherhand most other denominations, other then the RCC for they teach both views, teach either preterism or futurism. For this argument we can leave out preterism because it puts the antichrist in the past and therefore the calculations have no meaning. But in futurism the antihrist is put somewhere off in the future, why? Because the take the 70th week of Daniel's 490 days (70 week) prophecy and throw it into the future. We know this to be wrong because it is bad exegsis (sp) to split up a prophecy, especially when you cut part of it out of the middle of the main prophecy. The same is true of trying to force a completely different prophecy into an existing prophecy, which is what is being down with the Daniel 12:11-12 prophecy. It's bad exegsis (sp)

As to refering me to the charts that were made and corrected, I've already responded to those in post #8 here unfortunately I can't post links as I don't have enough posts yet.

I've spent over an hour on this I hope it goes through
 
Upvote 0

taikachanz

God's Word Stands Alone
Feb 20, 2011
168
0
✟22,788.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Sorry brother, I don't see it the same as you do... I'll stick to the pioneers understanding and the SOP.

Why would God now after 150 years, reveal something that would destroy our previous understanding... be careful, God is not the author of confusion.

Why did he wait to reveal what he did to EGW? Why not just give all that info to the earlier reformers and drag it out all those years? Why did he choose Martin Luther to be the final catalyst to bring to furition the reformist movement? You answer these and maybe you can get an answer. God does what he wants and he choses whom he will and reveals what he wants when he wants. EGW called it "Present Truth". But I wll again remind you, and others, that they were at least willing to delve deep into the word on an issue before passing judgment upon it, should we do any less, especially when EGW has told us not to rely soully upon her word but to always resort to the scripture for final authority? This is what I am doing and this is where I'm being lead.
 
Upvote 0
O

OntheDL

Guest
Now that's a new explanation to me. They way I understand it there a two views, as I explained before. The foundation of the first is that the "daily" was akin to paganism and that the three little horns that were plucked out were hindering Rome from expanding due to that paganism. My question concerning this is, how does paganism get rid of paganism? After all, in the Great Controversy EGW tells us that the Roman Church was inflitrated by pagans and became corrupted prior to the event mentioned. The second is easier still, and you can find this on vertually ALL sermons on cassete tape, VCR, CD or DVD, even posted on the internet wherein it is specifically stated that the daily, which is taught represents the daily sacrifice, was taken away by Christ. Which is it? Personally, I take the second view.

The word 'daily' is tammid in Hebrew. It occurred about 70 times in the Old Testament. In every occurrence, it refers to the religious activities conducted everyday in the sanctuary. There are 9 activities of 'daily'. Everyone of them points to the ministry of Jesus. The bible does a good job of interpreting itself.

How does paganism get rid of paganism? Unto 2300 days, then the sanctuary shall be cleansed. The cleansing refers to 'the day'. The Jews (for example Paul wrote about the day) knew it as the day of Atonement. The cleansing of the sanctuary refers to the Lev 16 day of Atonement service. Even the Jews reckon this as the day of Judgment. Jesus moved into the Most Holy Place in 1844 to begin the final phase of atonement: the judicial atonement, to vindicate the saints and to vindicate the God they believed. Thus the sanctuary was cleansed.

This is our one-and-only interpretation. This is how the 7th-day Adventists became a people.

This is the same conclusion that Miller took and was accepted by his followers. But, and I am not tell anybody to outright discard this, however, neither am I going to accept an outright refusal to at least have a thurough study of this, WITH OUT PREJUDICE. Remember this is exactly what many of the churches did in Miller's time.
Very true. The Millerites and the remnant scrutinized traditional interpretations, did exhaustive bible studies and sought the guidance of the spirit through prayers. Thus the more I study these doctrines the more confidence I have in the pioneers' work and spirit of prophecy testimonies.

Both dates of 1843 and 1844 were used to say that Christ was returning respectively. When he didn't return in 1843 the date was set to 1844. The 1844 date was reset using the 2300 day prophecy and adjusted from the month stated relating to Atexerxes' (sp) decree. This same adjustment could not have been applied to the 1290 & 1335 prophecy. Therefore the 1290 & 1335 prophecy still ended in 1843, a year shown to be insignificant and therefore this prophecy could not have been completed at that time.
Not so, both the 1290 and 1335 were confined inside of the 2300 prophecy. Therefore their ending of 1843 which is the sweet year only confirms our accurate interpretation of 2300 days. If you read Rev 10 with the context of the Great Disappointment, you should be able to see God designed it this way to bring them to a greater truth which is the sanctuary message.

You're wrong, WE ARE ISREAL. We accept Christ as our savior and thus we have become the seed of Abraham. "He is not a Jew who is one outwardly, but he is a Jew who is on inwardly."

That being said, you need to remember something everyone seems to forget when they read the prophecies in the OT, these were given to the world through Isreal of OT times and it is through Isreal of that time that we have to view the prophecies. If, as I have said and been taught, Jesus took away the "daily", which was the sacrifices because he became the ultimate and final sacrifice, then the daily through out prophetic scripture must remain the same consistantly. That being the case Daniel 12:11-12's "daily" must be that sacrifice as well as that "daily" in Daniel 8:12 and any other 'daily" that is mentioned prophectically throughout the scriptures. Also, there was only one Holy Place at that time and that was located within the Temple of God, which, when Daniel heard this, would be rebuilt when the decree went out to rebuild Jerusalem. Notice also when the "daily" would be taken away in chapter 8, it is during the introduction of the Greek empire, not after the introduction or during the introduction of the Roman power or the Beast power. Look at it carefully, a horn comes up out of the 4 horns of the Ram which means the power that takes away the daily comes out of the Greek empire. This is the way similar prophecies are interpretted so way change the form? I point to the llittle horn that cames up out of the Beast with the ten horns. We know this beast to be Rome and the little horn to be the apostate church, but if you apply the the same form to this prophecy as that of Daniel 8 then the little horn could be any such nation we choose to fit our needs.
Again, please read the plain scriptures. Jesus did not take away the daily. And the daily is not just the sacrifice. The Little Horn took away the daily.

The daily includes activities/services in addition to the sacrifice:
morning-evening burnt offerings
meal (cereal) offering
display of the high priest breastplate for judgment
the trimming and replenishing oil for the menorah
displaying of shewbread
the incense on the golden altar
the fire at the brazen altar
...

These are the 'daily' Jesus ministers on the sinner's behalf. The little horn (papacy) took away by substituting with mass, eucharist, human intercessors, indulgence...

The reason the little horn power had reference in Greece is because the Greek philosophy and Roman law were the leading characteristics of the Papal Rome. We saw this in the vision of the tree in Nebuchadnezzar's dream where the big tree (of babylon) was cut down by preserved with band of brass (Greece) and a band of iron (Rome).

That is assuming you continue to adhere to the problem that the 1290-1335 days prophecy ended in 1843 without adjustment in opposition to the 2300 days prophecy.
The prophetic time all finished at 1844. This is the seventh-day Adventist interpretation and always has been. And Ellen White confirmed the hand of God was in it and no man can alter it. Now if we reject and reinvent the wheel with our private interpretation, we wouldn't be the people God called out to be in Rev 10, right?
 
Upvote 0

EastCoastRemnant

I Must Decrease That He May Increase
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2010
7,665
1,505
Nova Scotia
✟210,609.00
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
OnTheDL, I'm slightly confused on your understanding of the daily when you stated that the more you study what the pioneers beleived, you see it to be truth... sister White clearly states that the correct view of the daily was what the pioneers taught, which was paganism... just wondering your thoughts.

As an aside, another aspect to throw in if you don't think timelines can be within timelines is little understood 2520 prophesy of the scattering and the gathering that is on both the 1843 chart as well as the 1850.... that is a facinating study that shows, without a doubt, that 1844 was the gathering of God's people again into a new covenanted relationship with Him.

The 2520 encompasses the 2300, the 1290, the 1335, the 490 and the 1260 year prohesies.

Here's a little info to get your spiritual radars hummin'...

The 10 northern tribes were taken into captivity, as part of the curse of Lev 26:14-33 to be punished, in 723 BC... the two remaining tribes were initially taken captive, and therfore all of Israel scattered, in 677BC. If you add the time period of 2520 to each date you will see that the first 2520 of the northern tribes, which was the beginning of the curse and punishment would end in 1798. The persecution of Israel was split evenly between the pagans and the papists at 1260 years each... 723+1260=538, 538+1260=1798.
The final scattering of God's people was recorded in 677 BC and adding 2520, we come to the year 1844, which was the gathering again of God's people. If any one is interested in learning more about this forgotten aspect of pioneer understanding, let me know and I'll give links to some people that have seriously 'harkened unto the old paths that we should walk therein.'
 
Upvote 0

taikachanz

God's Word Stands Alone
Feb 20, 2011
168
0
✟22,788.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
OnTheDL, I'm slightly confused on your understanding of the daily when you stated that the more you study what the pioneers beleived, you see it to be truth... sister White clearly states that the correct view of the daily was what the pioneers taught, which was paganism... just wondering your thoughts.

As an aside, another aspect to throw in if you don't think timelines can be within timelines is little understood 2520 prophesy of the scattering and the gathering that is on both the 1843 chart as well as the 1850.... that is a facinating study that shows, without a doubt, that 1844 was the gathering of God's people again into a new covenanted relationship with Him.

The 2520 encompasses the 2300, the 1290, the 1335, the 490 and the 1260 year prohesies.

Here's a little info to get your spiritual radars hummin'...

The 10 northern tribes were taken into captivity, as part of the curse of Lev 26:14-33 to be punished, in 723 BC... the two remaining tribes were initially taken captive, and therfore all of Israel scattered, in 677BC. If you add the time period of 2520 to each date you will see that the first 2520 of the northern tribes, which was the beginning of the curse and punishment would end in 1798. The persecution of Israel was split evenly between the pagans and the papists at 1260 years each... 723+1260=538, 538+1260=1798.
The final scattering of God's people was recorded in 677 BC and adding 2520, we come to the year 1844, which was the gathering again of God's people. If any one is interested in learning more about this forgotten aspect of pioneer understanding, let me know and I'll give links to some people that have seriously 'harkened unto the old paths that we should walk therein.'

The is another aspect of prophecy I have been researching, the 1260 days prohecy(s), but as of yet have not delved into. My "theory" is that there are at least six seperate 1260 days prophecies, eash seperate from the other. But, as I stated, this is only a theory and as of yet I have nor evidence, but I am checking historical records to determine if perhaps there is a connection. East, thanks for this bit of information because is it begins to support part of my theory.
 
Upvote 0

taikachanz

God's Word Stands Alone
Feb 20, 2011
168
0
✟22,788.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
The word 'daily' is tammid in Hebrew. It occurred about 70 times in the Old Testament. In every occurrence, it refers to the religious activities conducted everyday in the sanctuary.

As East already pointed out you are in disagreement with the original pioneers. See post #8, the letter concerning the chart written by Bro. Loughborough and my critique.

There are 9 activities of 'daily'. Everyone of them points to the ministry of Jesus. The bible does a good job of interpreting itself.

We are in agreement here.

How does paganism get rid of paganism? [/quote}

The question wasn't answered. Bro L makes the statement that the "daily" was paganism and the this paganism hindered the advence of the antichrist. The question thererfore was and remains "How does paganism get rid of paganism."

Unto 2300 days, then the sanctuary shall be cleansed. The cleansing refers to 'the day'. The Jews (for example Paul wrote about the day) knew it as the day of Atonement. The cleansing of the sanctuary refers to the Lev 16 day of Atonement service. Even the Jews reckon this as the day of Judgment. Jesus moved into the Most Holy Place in 1844 to begin the final phase of atonement: the judicial atonement, to vindicate the saints and to vindicate the God they believed. Thus the sanctuary was cleansed.

I do not dispute the interpretation of the 2300 days prophecy nor the cleansing of the sanctuary.

This is our one-and-only interpretation. This is how the 7th-day Adventists became a people.

It's beginning to appear the it isn't.

Very true. The Millerites and the remnant scrutinized traditional interpretations, did exhaustive bible studies and sought the guidance of the spirit through prayers. Thus the more I study these doctrines the more confidence I have in the pioneers' work and spirit of prophecy testimonies.

I too have confidence in the pioneers and the SOP, however, I do not believe, after what I have been studying and researching, that God revealed everything and that what they taught was complete.

Not so, both the 1290 and 1335 were confined inside of the 2300 prophecy. Therefore their ending of 1843 which is the sweet year only confirms our accurate interpretation of 2300 days. If you read Rev 10 with the context of the Great Disappointment, you should be able to see God designed it this way to bring them to a greater truth which is the sanctuary message.

The "sweet" you refer to are the years leading up to the disappointment. A much needed revival began when Miller was compelled to preach what he had gleaned from the scriptures concerning this issue. 1843 was a year of disappointment as was 1844. Hope was rekindled in 1843 when it was discovered that a miscalculation had occurred and the date was adjusted. I still contend that Daniel 12:11-12 is a seperate and distinct prophecy from the 2300 days prophecy else it would have been referred to earlier, look at the pattern of the rest of Daniel's prophecies. There is a distinct chronology set down in each of them with set events particular to each. I will admit the the Daniel 12:11-12 prophecy falls within the time frame of the 2300 days prophecy, but still, it is seperate and distinct from it because it extends beyond the end of that prophecy up until the end of the age as it told to Daniel.

Question: Have you even read my entire posts, or did you just skim through it, see what you considered error and immediately jump to refuting it without even so much as comparing what I posted with scripture rather then with "doctrine"?

Again, please read the plain scriptures. Jesus did not take away the daily. And the daily is not just the sacrifice. The Little Horn took away the daily.

The daily includes activities/services in addition to the sacrifice:
morning-evening burnt offerings
meal (cereal) offering
display of the high priest breastplate for judgment
the trimming and replenishing oil for the menorah
displaying of shewbread
the incense on the golden altar
the fire at the brazen altar
...

When the veil was rent in twain the spiritual forms of the temple services were ended. They, all of them, were no longer need

All the sacrifices and offerings were now embodied in Christ
Jesus became our High Priest and now wears the priestly breastplate
Jesus is the oil and the light
Jesus is the bread of life
Jesus is our intercessor (incense)
Jesus is the fire that will devour the wicked (his word)

And it was the Romans, BEFORE the little horn arose, that took away the literal "daily" as you've discribed it.

These are the 'daily' Jesus ministers on the sinner's behalf. The little horn (papacy) took away by substituting with mass, eucharist, human intercessors, indulgence...

The little horn only counterfieted what was done within the earthly temple it didn't take it away. Prophecy told us this would happen and it did. Do I need to quote it?

The reason the little horn power had reference in Greece is because the Greek philosophy and Roman law were the leading characteristics of the Papal Rome. We saw this in the vision of the tree in Nebuchadnezzar's dream where the big tree (of babylon) was cut down by preserved with band of brass (Greece) and a band of iron (Rome).

You need to explain why it is that the "horn" raises up from the midst of the four hours of the Ram should be interpreted differently from the "little horn" that raises up in the midsts of the ten horns of the final beast. If the "little horn" must relate to a power within the Roman Empire then why doesn't the "horn" rise up from within the Greek Empire. Once Rome conquered Greece that empire no longer existed as a power and therefore it would not make sense that a power would rise up from with in it. The "horn" had to rise up before Rome conquered Greece to make sense of the prophecy.

Also, note the distinction between these two, on is referred to as "horn" and the other as "little horn". "Horn" indicating an established power of sorts and "little horn" indicating an infant power.

The prophetic time all finished at 1844. This is the seventh-day Adventist interpretation and always has been. And Ellen White confirmed the hand of God was in it and no man can alter it. Now if we reject and reinvent the wheel with our private interpretation, we wouldn't be the people God called out to be in Rev 10, right?

It does if you continue to insist on squeezing the final prophecy of Daniel into the 2300 Days prophecy. Rejection of error has been done before, it's not a matter of "reinventing the wheel", its a matter of determining the truth form error. As I've stated numerous times, it is error to reject "new light" without a thurough investigation. And the only way to investigate honestly is to start from scratch, without prejudice.

I will humbly remind you of what God spoke to Hosea

4:6 "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I wll also forget thy children."

I know that you do not reject the Lord's law, but rejecting knowledge can be almost as bad as it may lead to the rejection of the law as well.
 
Upvote 0