• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Those who denounce Paul

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,549
28,531
75
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
36,305
4,789
On the bus to Heaven
✟125,733.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
36,305
4,789
On the bus to Heaven
✟125,733.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others


I am surprised this thread hasn't been taken to the UT board by now

But for myself, I am hoping it will stay around on GT for awhile



.

I guess as long as it stays within the context of the OP it can stay in GT. But the line is getting thinner though.
 
Upvote 0
F

from scratch

Guest
What is "right"? Would you agree that it's the opposite of "wrong"? And that "wrong" = "sin"? And that the definition of "sin" is "transgressing YHWH's Law" (1Jn)?

Thus, the liberty of being able to do what's right is to be free to walk in His Torah.
Only when you're under its jurisdiction. Fortunately the Christian isn't under its jurisdiction and can't violate it.
 
Upvote 0
F

from scratch

Guest
But the issue is what that law written on one's heart actually is. Some claim it the as written on stone tablets. I request evidence this is true. I can't fine any. I can redefine words to make it true though. I can deny Moses about what the covenant with Israel contains.
 
Upvote 0
F

from scratch

Guest
What was the reason they turned from Paul? Was it because they refused what he taught which for him there was no compromise? If one doesn't like what another says they tend to exclude them. What do you think denominationalism is all about?

I'd love to get into the rest of your post. But right now I'm a little short on time.
 
Upvote 0

ananda

Early Buddhist
May 6, 2011
14,757
2,123
Soujourner on Earth
✟193,871.00
Marital Status
Private
Well, you are a church of one and an unorthodox church at that. The rest of us mainstream Christians will continue to believe the whole of the word of God not the parts that merely suits our theology as you do. As I said, it is of no consequence.
"Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor"

I have a local community of approximately 20+ individual believers that believe as I do, not to mention others worldwide.

You claim to follow "the whole of the word of God", yet you have not/cannot(?) even tell me which canon is "the whole of the word of God".

I do not reject books based on what "suits my theology". I reject books based on YHWH's rules He gave beforehand to guide what must come after.
 
Upvote 0

ananda

Early Buddhist
May 6, 2011
14,757
2,123
Soujourner on Earth
✟193,871.00
Marital Status
Private
What I believe Messiah is commanding is that we are to listen to the Pharisees as far as when they properly teach from Moses (YHWH's Law), but we are not to follow after their traditions. Yet some are still enjoining me now to follow their man-made traditions and to reject YHWH's Law!

The Pharisees denied justice by rejecting YHWH's Law, which provides the proper basis for justice, mercy, and faith.

"A widow who is put on the list for support must be a woman who is at least sixty years old and was faithful to her husband." 1Tim 5:9 (NLT). Did Torah/Law restrict widows from receiving support based on age?
 
Upvote 0

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Why did he try to split the council? Was "the resurrection issue" the reason he was arrested in the first place?

Here's the charge---

"Crying out, Men of Israel, help: This is the man, that teacheth all men every where against the people, and the law, and this place: and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place."

He defended himself successfully saying he persecuted Christians, until this part.

"And he said unto me, Depart: for I will send thee far hence unto the Gentiles."

They didn't like that, though it was prophesied from Genesis and in Psalms and in the prophets.

Point is Saul taught the righteousness of the Law, until he knew Christ. Then Paul rejected that for the righteousness of Christ (Phil 3). The Pharisees and other Jews did not like the message. They preferred to work their own righteousness, just like Saul did.

Today, people try to skewer Paul for the same message of righteousness in Christ, rather than from the Law (Deut 6).
 
Upvote 0

Frogster

Galatians is the best!
Sep 7, 2009
44,343
3,067
✟81,817.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Republican

why point out how they deserted Paul? Did they not leave Jesus? ever hear of the verse, "strike down the shepherd, the sheep will scatter"?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
-snip- We must indeed be more Torah-observant than the lawless, liberal Pharisees (Mt 5:20, 2Pet 3:17)!

No, not "more"; but you must follow it perfectly to enter the Kingdom. It is your righteousness (Deut 6). It is impossible to do so after 70ad.

Quite the problem to have to do what is impossible, while rejecting the solution (Phil 3).
 
Upvote 0

Frogster

Galatians is the best!
Sep 7, 2009
44,343
3,067
✟81,817.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Republican

you still did not cover your Romans 3:7 mistake, and Paul knew he was under attack. Were the evil things said about Jesus true?

the lasw and command issue you gave is a weak...atttack, stop acting like Paul did not know the law, he was figured to replace Gamaliel in the future...

can't ya gimmie some strong stuff here, gee, I posted unbelievable strong support for Paul, from Luke, but all i get is this? Gee...they say paul llied..like he did not know that?
 
Upvote 0

Frogster

Galatians is the best!
Sep 7, 2009
44,343
3,067
✟81,817.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Republican

true indeed...the fathers could not bear it....
 
Upvote 0

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

Because he was arrested and in chains. It was for persecution. Not for doctrine.

Besides later he did go through Asia Minor.




Do you reject James as well?

"If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:"
 
Upvote 0

Frogster

Galatians is the best!
Sep 7, 2009
44,343
3,067
✟81,817.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Republican
So why did the Apostle John write this command to the "NT" church? Was he wrong?

He stressed 2 commands in 1 John, lemeee know if you want to see them, he said "this is the command", AND THERE WERE 2...not 613...
 
Upvote 0

ananda

Early Buddhist
May 6, 2011
14,757
2,123
Soujourner on Earth
✟193,871.00
Marital Status
Private
Here's the charge--- "Crying out, Men of Israel, help: This is the man, that teacheth all men every where against the people, and the law, and this place: and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place."
Does this reason sound anything like his claim in the Sanhedrin that he was arrested for the issue of the resurrection?

What was prophesied?

Self-righteousness does not mean "righteousness one might gain from following YHWH's Law". Self-righteousness means "the belief that one is righteous based on following one's own traditions or religious practices apart from YHWH's Law".
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Frogster

Galatians is the best!
Sep 7, 2009
44,343
3,067
✟81,817.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Republican

are human beings not all the same? besides, in Acts 15, jewish peter said that HE, not the JEWISH, fathers could bear the torah yoke...
 
Upvote 0