there's plenty of disproof in the existence of God, the lack of proof being one of them. here's another example of disproof:
"Logical proof time. God can't think. Think about it. An omniscient being would know everything and as such could consider nothing. To think about something means asking questions. Something that knows everything has no questions to ask – it knows already. Ergo it cannot consider. The result of its consideration would already be known.
This basically means that god can't decide. If god can't decide there's no point in asking it do anything. This also means that god has no free will. It knows in advance what it will choose and so it can't choose. It just follows a preset pattern of action.
Of course, these things that god can't do also mean that god is not omnipotent. In fact god is powerless, completely so, because god has no free will."
(I would post the link but I can't post links until I have 50 posts, sorry)
my morals come from common sense, it isn't hard to figure out the difference between right and wrong with an intellectual mind. You don't need God or religion to tell you what's right or what's wrong, right and wrong can be found, like I said, using common sense. unfortunately, not everyone (murders, rapists, junkies and all other people considered wrong) has that ability of intellectual, logical and rational common sense. I would say my morals are circumstantial based on logical and rational thought.
that's exactly my point.