Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Frankly I think that would be a GREAT picture.Yeah, if he was going to claim these are just supporters he should have put the kids' father in the photos too
Him with a family of supporters would be better than an attempt to deceive voters by posing with a woman and kids.Frankly I think that would be a GREAT picture.
Yes! Thank you! All this makes waaaaay more sense to me than this playing out.Him with a family of supporters would be better than an attempt to deceive voters by posing with a woman and kids.
Actually just him and his fiancé would have been better.
Maybe he supports the family unit, as as a top campaign priority, but has unfortunate personal issues preventing him from fulfilling his own dreams... Should anyone stand in his way from expressing his passion in full?Neither is his behaviour.
I can see that and I'm definitely pulling for the conservatives but this just seems like an unforced error.Maybe he supports the family unit, as as a top campaign priority, but has unfortunate personal issues preventing him from fulfilling his own dreams... Should anyone stand in his way from expressing his passion in full?
...In that case, perhaps he should be considered a hero by those who support families and children.
Possibly. But everyone deserves a good defence. And since the politician isn't here to defend himself, I'm filling in for him.I can see that and I'm definitely pulling for the conservatives but this just seems like an unforced error.
The picture was intentionally misleading, I just have to admit it.
Just between me and youNothing wrong with that brother
LOL.
See post 35.

What's with the attempts to make a big deal out of nothing? It smacks of "getting desperate".I would note that my original response to this picture was 3 words.
I'm not trying to bend over backwards to justify this weirdness. If it was much ado about nothing, what's the deal with the attempts at justifying?
I'm not making a "big deal".
What's with the attempts to make a big deal out of nothing? It smacks of "getting desperate".
Is your name Sebastian Murdock and do you write for the Huff Post? Or all of the other media outlets making a big deal out of it? Are you the one making all the social media posts about it? Are you under the impression that you're the only person who's brought it up, and therefore my talking about it being blown out of proportion must be directed and you and you alone?I'm not making a "big deal".
3 words.
Yes. I'm responding to people who are making a big deal instead of just recognizing how weird it is and moving on with their day.Is your name Sebastian Murdock and do you write for the Huff Post? Or all of the other media outlets making a big deal out of it? Are you the one making all the social media posts about it? Are you under the impression that you're the only person who's brought it up, and therefore my talking about it being blown out of proportion must be directed and you and you alone?
However, what three words? There's more than 3 words in your OP and there's certainly more than 3 words in your subsequent posts.
No but why?Possibly. But everyone deserves a good defence. And since the politician isn't here to defend himself, I'm filling in for him.![]()
What if....his friend twisted his arm, and he's just a nice guy so he reluctantly went along with it? Thing is, we don't know all the information.No but why?
You have NO obligation to defend the guy.
Why can't you just say he made an error in judgement?
Why is that SOOOO hard to just.....say?
Honestly how would you respond if a Democrat did this? Wouldn't you find it weird? Would you defend him/her?
When will you move on?Yes. I'm responding to people who are making a big deal instead of just recognizing how weird it is and moving on with their day.
"The woman and three girls featured in the video ― which was uploaded to Anderson’s YouTube channel and posted on a website paid for by the National Republican Campaign Committee ― are instead the family of one of Anderson’s longtime friends. Anderson announced earlier this month that he is engaged and lives alone with his dog, per the Times. He has no kids."It's deceitful but is it a big deal?
Childless GOP Candidate Posed With Friend's Wife And Kids For Campaign Video
This seems weird.
It's deceitful but is it a big deal?
Childless GOP Candidate Posed With Friend's Wife And Kids For Campaign Video
This seems weird.
He opened the door for it by running a deceitful ad.'Cease and desist': Republican demands Dem opponent stop mocking his 'fake wife and kids'
One such ad, paid for by the House Majority PAC, shows an Anderson look-alike eating dinner and playing games with cardboard cutouts.
The Anderson look-alike ... pokes another daughter's cardboard face with a forkful of food, ... and cheats at a game that appears to be Monopoly.
Anderson’s campaign argued to Vindman and local television stations they did not have the right to air images of Ashley Cremisio and her three daughters
[However,] the images in question remain publicly available on a National Republican Congressional Committee databank of publishable materials for super PACs to use in ads.
View attachment 356669