First, let me say I'm not here to convince anyone of anything. I'm here to honestly speak of my doubts in Christianity in the spirit of open mindedness and in the hope that I learn something new.
While I am no longer a Christian myself, I am not hostile to Christianity. I simple cannot bring myself to believe in it any longer.
With that said, here is why I don't believe that Jesus is God. If you can spot a flaw in my thinking, and you think telling me about it will restore my faith in Jesus, then please do. Being a Christian again would make my life much easier
:
I don't believe that Jesus is God, essentially, because there is no proof that Jesus is really God, as opposed to Allah, Vishnu, Zoroaster, Zeus, etc. After I've told you that I don't believe that Jesus is God can be proven, you can only respond in one of two ways:
1) That Jesus' divinity cannot be proven, but that shouldn't matter because one should believe in Jesus as a matter of faith (i.e., in absence of proof).
OR
2) By telling me that, in fact, Jesus is God and it can be proven through historical, scientific, archaeological, etc. evidence.
Here is my response to (1):
If there is no proof which separates the real God from the fakes, and I am instead to simply take a leap of faith, then why should I pick Jesus?
If I'm essentially to believe...well, just because...then why would I pick Jesus? Why don't I just put up the name of every deity on my wall which humans have ever believed in and throw darts? After all, less than 1/3 of humans on Earth believe that Jesus is God. The rest believe in a collection of other Gods, so it's not as if picking a which God is real is an easy thing to do-- plenty of smart people believe just as firmly as Christians do that Jesus is not real.
In other words, if you say that believing in Jesus is a matter of faith, not proof, then I can't accept that reasoning because there is nothing stopping me from becoming a Muslim instead of a Christian. I might as well throw darts.
Here is my response to (2):
While some argue there is proof that Jesus is God, I am not in a position to properly evaluate that proof.
No one human is a historian, archaeologist, logician, linguist, theologian, physicist, biologist, astronomer or expert in every field which purports to prove that Jesus is God. Therefore, we have to take the advice of experts in these fields to weigh the supposed evidence that Jesus is God. And because the experts in all of these fields cannot agree on whether Jesus is God, how am I supposed to know what, if anything, the evidence proves? I cannot know, and therefore even if there is proof, it's beyond me to understand it.
The combination of these two answers constitutes my strongest reason for not believing in Jesus-- that Jesus' existence cannot be proven because no human is an expert in enough fields to evaluate the proof if there is any; and if people cannot decide which the real god is based on proof, then humans are essentially making an arbitrary choice. God, therefore, has put humans into an impossible situation where they will likely go to hell based on chance!
This would make Jesus, if he is real, a very sadistic, cruel being. He has essentially put humans in a room with a gun to their head, told them to pick a number between 1-100 (pick a religion among many), and if the human guesses the wrong one, he will blow their head off (send them to hell forever)!
What kind of sadistic God would dream up such a scheme? What kind of loving father would play Russian roulette with his kids?
The end result is either that this situation is so absurd that it cannot be true, or Jesus is a cruel, sadistic God who will likely torture me no matter what I do.
While I am no longer a Christian myself, I am not hostile to Christianity. I simple cannot bring myself to believe in it any longer.
With that said, here is why I don't believe that Jesus is God. If you can spot a flaw in my thinking, and you think telling me about it will restore my faith in Jesus, then please do. Being a Christian again would make my life much easier
I don't believe that Jesus is God, essentially, because there is no proof that Jesus is really God, as opposed to Allah, Vishnu, Zoroaster, Zeus, etc. After I've told you that I don't believe that Jesus is God can be proven, you can only respond in one of two ways:
1) That Jesus' divinity cannot be proven, but that shouldn't matter because one should believe in Jesus as a matter of faith (i.e., in absence of proof).
OR
2) By telling me that, in fact, Jesus is God and it can be proven through historical, scientific, archaeological, etc. evidence.
Here is my response to (1):
If there is no proof which separates the real God from the fakes, and I am instead to simply take a leap of faith, then why should I pick Jesus?
If I'm essentially to believe...well, just because...then why would I pick Jesus? Why don't I just put up the name of every deity on my wall which humans have ever believed in and throw darts? After all, less than 1/3 of humans on Earth believe that Jesus is God. The rest believe in a collection of other Gods, so it's not as if picking a which God is real is an easy thing to do-- plenty of smart people believe just as firmly as Christians do that Jesus is not real.
In other words, if you say that believing in Jesus is a matter of faith, not proof, then I can't accept that reasoning because there is nothing stopping me from becoming a Muslim instead of a Christian. I might as well throw darts.
Here is my response to (2):
While some argue there is proof that Jesus is God, I am not in a position to properly evaluate that proof.
No one human is a historian, archaeologist, logician, linguist, theologian, physicist, biologist, astronomer or expert in every field which purports to prove that Jesus is God. Therefore, we have to take the advice of experts in these fields to weigh the supposed evidence that Jesus is God. And because the experts in all of these fields cannot agree on whether Jesus is God, how am I supposed to know what, if anything, the evidence proves? I cannot know, and therefore even if there is proof, it's beyond me to understand it.
The combination of these two answers constitutes my strongest reason for not believing in Jesus-- that Jesus' existence cannot be proven because no human is an expert in enough fields to evaluate the proof if there is any; and if people cannot decide which the real god is based on proof, then humans are essentially making an arbitrary choice. God, therefore, has put humans into an impossible situation where they will likely go to hell based on chance!
This would make Jesus, if he is real, a very sadistic, cruel being. He has essentially put humans in a room with a gun to their head, told them to pick a number between 1-100 (pick a religion among many), and if the human guesses the wrong one, he will blow their head off (send them to hell forever)!
What kind of sadistic God would dream up such a scheme? What kind of loving father would play Russian roulette with his kids?
The end result is either that this situation is so absurd that it cannot be true, or Jesus is a cruel, sadistic God who will likely torture me no matter what I do.