KomissarSteve
Basileus
Note how He does not exclude other marriage arrangements in His statement.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
JESUS HAS fully agreed with EXACTLY what GOD means by marriage.
Can you show me where this has been shown? For that matter, can you show me where I have quoted statistics? I'm far too lazy to dig the around the internet looking for supporting material unless I really have to. And if you can show me solid evidence from an unbiased source, not just one I agree with, it will go far to changing my mind on a subject. For the record, while I may agree with much on crooksandliars.com, I do not believe everything it post without independent corroborative evidence.And the source of your statistics have been shown to be under the control of liberal homosexual supporting organizations. Does the pot only accept it's own rationalizations?
Huh? This sentence does not make sense to me. Can you clarify what you mean?Some would do wise to learn from the historical facts they strive to repeat.
Littlenipper accused me of using "tainted statistics" in another thread where I presented no statistics at all.Can you show me where this has been shown? For that matter, can you show me where I have quoted statistics? I'm far too lazy to dig the around the internet looking for supporting material unless I really have to. And if you can show me solid evidence from an unbiased source, not just one I agree with, it will go far to changing my mind on a subject. For the record, while I may agree with much on crooksandliars.com, I do not believe everything it post without independent corroborative evidence.
Ooh. Revelations 2 has more vague mentionings of sexual immorality. We don't know if this is even literal immorality; it could be that the the sexual immorality/adultery mentioned in Rev 2:20-21 (NIV trans) could even be a spiritual one -- in other words, worshipping Roman deities.JESUS HAS fully agreed with EXACTLY what GOD means by marriage. And since MARRIAGE is described to be only between a man and a woman, that negates any attempt by people calling themselves "christian" from assuming that marriage can be any other sort of committed relationship. AND since sex is not condoned outside of marrage, homosexual (where sexual contact occures) are in error.
AND, I will go one step further. CHRIST blasts the church of Thyatira for their toleration of a woman referred to as Jezebel (who apparently called herself a prophetess) who was misleading that congregation into sexual immorality and eating food sacrificed idols. It may be considered that the vestal virgins were little more than temple prostitutes who engaged in all sort of despicable sexual acts in the name of their gods with regards to the sacrifices they performed. Read Revelations Chapter 2. So people who hide behind cloaks of "Christianity" to its distortion are not to be tolerated unless that congregation cares to be punished by GOD.
I'm gonna type this slowly so you can be sure to read it.JESUS HAS fully agreed with EXACTLY what GOD means by marriage. And since MARRIAGE is described to be only between a man and a woman, that negates any attempt by people calling themselves "christian" from assuming that marriage can be any other sort of committed relationship. AND since sex is not condoned outside of marrage, homosexual (where sexual contact occures) are in error.
I wouldn't hold my breath were I you.So people who hide behind cloaks of "Christianity" to its distortion are not to be tolerated unless that congregation cares to be punished by GOD.
Woo! *raves* But yeah, as you said, my statement was pretty much ignored. No surprise, actually. :/Oh, bless you!But what I mean was, "I thought this mindset would have died out with most of the producers of Boys Beware."
I second your motion, but nothing will come out of it. In the meantime, grab your glowsticks! It's a rave.
He... never mentioned anything about history... just that he's a history teacher. Yet... I don['t even know how this post relates to the thread we're talking about anyway.Some would do wise to learn from the historical facts they strive to repeat.
JESUS HAS fully agreed with EXACTLY what GOD means by marriage. And since MARRIAGE is described to be only between a man and a woman, that negates any attempt by people calling themselves "christian" from assuming that marriage can be any other sort of committed relationship. AND since sex is not condoned outside of marrage, homosexual (of their gods with regards to the sacrifices they performed.
Actually I am a she. I am a professor in a college.He... never mentioned anything about history... just that he's a history teacher. Yet... I don['t even know how this post relates to the thread we're talking about anyway.
I posted them because they are true, and reality. So far all you really are doing is kicking up dust. I don't see anything meaty in your posts besides "You're mean" for making you guys look at reality. And come on dude, only about a third of them were about HIV. What about the ones about the high level of promiscuity, and the increase over the years of unprotected sex among them?
Jonathan, perhaps.Can anyone show one case of a homosexuality in the bible approved by God?
Again, it's the social result that God condemns, not the act itself.
KC, some research does go "bad," like phrenology. Some research is replaced by more sophisticated models. For example, classical mechanics doesn't work on the atomic level, so quantum mechanics was developed. In either case, it is good to bring the most recent research to the table -- especially when discussing homosexuality, because there are more researchers studying the field and more uncloseted homosexuals to study.
Can anyone show one case of a homosexuality in the bible approved by God?
Again, it's the social result that God condemns, not the act itself.
CHRIST NEVER EXCLUDED ANYTHING THAT COUNTED FOR RIGHTEOUSNESS SAKE. That doesn't say much for "gay marriage" now does it?Note how He does not exclude other marriage arrangements in His statement.
That is why I don't bother providing you with statistics .....Can you show me where this has been shown? For that matter, can you show me where I have quoted statistics? I'm far too lazy to dig the around the internet looking for supporting material unless I really have to. And if you can show me solid evidence from an unbiased source, not just one I agree with, it will go far to changing my mind on a subject. For the record, while I may agree with much on crooksandliars.com, I do not believe everything it post without independent corroborative evidence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?