Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
This election is about jobs.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="whatbogsends" data-source="post: 61574162" data-attributes="member: 11978"><p>Because unlike Romney, he's not proposing policies that directly contributed to the economic crisis of 2008.</p><p></p><p>Neither the Democratic or Republican party are offering solutions that will resolve the most significant problems we are facing. Romney's solutions, however, will exacerbate them, as he continues to support the failed policies that fostered our current economic climate.</p><p></p><p>I'm not (nor have i) advocated that one should vote for Obama. However, the Romney supporters on these forums have been significantly more willing to distort the truth in an effort to persuade others. </p><p></p><p>Putting forth the Lindsey Lohan endorsement of Romney as any sort of "insight" is exactly the type of partisan dishonesty i refer to. If Lohan came out to support Obama, Republicans would either a) rightfully ignore it, b) say that the "drugged out" ravings of Lohan show that only druggies/people not in their right mind support Obama or c) if brought forth by desperate Obama supporters as any sort of support for their position - would say the obvious, that Lohan's opinion isn't doesn't provide any value in this discussion. Given posters past history, i would wager on a and b responses to outnumber the c responses by conservatives in this forum.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="whatbogsends, post: 61574162, member: 11978"] Because unlike Romney, he's not proposing policies that directly contributed to the economic crisis of 2008. Neither the Democratic or Republican party are offering solutions that will resolve the most significant problems we are facing. Romney's solutions, however, will exacerbate them, as he continues to support the failed policies that fostered our current economic climate. I'm not (nor have i) advocated that one should vote for Obama. However, the Romney supporters on these forums have been significantly more willing to distort the truth in an effort to persuade others. Putting forth the Lindsey Lohan endorsement of Romney as any sort of "insight" is exactly the type of partisan dishonesty i refer to. If Lohan came out to support Obama, Republicans would either a) rightfully ignore it, b) say that the "drugged out" ravings of Lohan show that only druggies/people not in their right mind support Obama or c) if brought forth by desperate Obama supporters as any sort of support for their position - would say the obvious, that Lohan's opinion isn't doesn't provide any value in this discussion. Given posters past history, i would wager on a and b responses to outnumber the c responses by conservatives in this forum. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
This election is about jobs.
Top
Bottom