Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
we also except the fact that the EO has valid sacrements, meaning they too have priests and the Eucharist in their Church is also transformed into the Body and Blood of Christthe insistence that Christ's presence is only in the RCC Eucharist
Very interesting discussion, Albion. When I joined these forums I gave a lot of thought concerning my title and identification and ended up using my name and not identifying with any church body. It is not that I do not have solid beliefs, but that my identity and allegiance are to Jesus Christ, alone, and not to anything or anyone else.
On the OBOB forum I frequently read threads that mystically transform Christ into the RCC church itself, which certainly smacks of idolatry or the insistence that Christ's presence is only in the RCC Eucharist or that, as Pope Benedict has recently reaffirmed, (full) salvation is found only the in the RCC church.
The only other forum that I have encountered with such a high level of membership intensity and identification is the LDS forum.
A division by any other name is still a DivisionCatholics love their Church, we really see it as a gift from God, proof that He loves us. The Church is a tool, the tool God uses to bring people to Him, when I hear protestants talk about their churches it almost sounds like they are talking about the company they work for "I like the people there, it was good to my parents, it was the what I grew up in"
I hear protestants say "I am Christian first and ____ second" but Catholics do not think that way, it is "I am a Catholic" it is not that we do not value Christ, He is the Lord, He should have all of our love and devotion, but part of being Catholic is having Christ as our Lord so we do not seperate the two things.
I think it has more to do with social differances then with faith in Christ, I understand how these things can be off putting to you.
we also except the fact that the EO has valid sacrements, meaning they too have priests and the Eucharist in their Church is also transformed into the Body and Blood of Christ
An interesting and informative discussion.
That the Cyprianic ecclesiology evidenced in the RCC claim is repeated by other Apostolic Churches might, by this stage, have given rise to some thought about ways in which that claim can be understood without being particularist; there must be some such thinking, but can anyone point me to it?
Hi TJ.If you can find a copy of a book titled, "The Community of the Beloved Disciple" by Raymond Brown(a Roman Catholic historian---but not an honest one), he does a good job of laying out the differences in the Ignatius citations concerning "apostolic succession" that began to develop in the 2nd century, and which Rome has taken out of context as they do Cyprian, and the fact of the early churches being autonomous entitites in a loose confederation of churches, each led and ruled by a plurality of elders/bishops/presbyters.
Actually, Dr. Brown agrees that the Roman system of ecclesiology is not Biblical and was not what was practiced by the early church.
How do these verses fit into your views?Very interesting discussion, Albion. When I joined these forums I gave a lot of thought concerning my title and identification and ended up using my name and not identifying with any church body. It is not that I do not have solid beliefs, but that my identity and allegiance are to Jesus Christ, alone, and not to anything or anyone else.
On the OBOB forum I frequently read threads that mystically transform Christ into the RCC church itself, which certainly smacks of idolatry or the insistence that Christ's presence is only in the RCC Eucharist or that, as Pope Benedict has recently reaffirmed, (full) salvation is found only the in the RCC church.
The only other forum that I have encountered with such a high level of membership intensity and identification is the LDS forum.
Which Church was Jesus referring to if not the Catholic Church?Rejection of rome, and false teaching from any denomination, is not a rejection of Christ or His Church.
I think most romans here would be surprised at how willing we protestants are to submit to godly authority.
Which Church was Jesus referring to if not the Catholic Church?
Which Church is built on the foundation of Peter?
Which Church has apostolic succession and the ability to forgive sins, granted by Christ?
Reality may be uncomfortable for you, in some cases, but you can't change it!
1) True. The Catholic Church is worldwide with over billion members.1. His Church is not limited to rome
2. His Chirch is built upon Himself..not pete
3. We are all able, and should be willing, to forgive sins...no popes need apply
I prefer God's reality to the fabrications and revisionsit history of rome.
So you are your own pope.1. I already answered.
2 and 3. I reject the "traditional" ways rome has twisted Scripture to support its own ideals and usurping of Christs rightful Lordship. Better to simply follow Christ and what Scripture actually says than to follow false teachers.
Nope, I leave the unbiblical claim of infallability to you romans and your popes.So you are your own pope.
I get it. You have your own infallible interpretation of scripture.
Good luck with that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?