• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

There's been another assassination attempt on Trump

Postvieww

Believer
Sep 29, 2014
6,786
2,531
South
✟170,458.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What I don't get is why you can't be bothered to write a paragraph or two summarizing some video's point. This is a text-based forum, not a YT channel.
I have in the past at times done that but the response is the same from liberals, immpune the source therefore the fact do not have to be addressed.

This is a text based forum which allows videos to be posted that explain various points raised by posters. Any summary of any video will never be as good as the actual information, in fact a summary could be less accurate or not as well explained. You just seem to be making excuses about precious time, and computer destroying videos on Rumble.

Let's be honest your beef with Rumble is that conservatives started it because of the censorship of YouTube.
 
Upvote 0

RocksInMyHead

God is innocent; Noah built on a floodplain!
May 12, 2011
8,846
9,632
PA
✟420,497.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Sweeping the perimeter and posting an agent at known spots of vunerabilities. This spot was known, it had been used previously by the press. Gunman was there about 12 hours prior.
Do we know that the perimeter wasn't swept? Or are you just assuming that because he wasn't caught? Perhaps they missed the guy on the first pass (whether due to a mistake/incompetence or the shooter being very good at hiding). Was it normal to have an agent stationed at that specific location regardless of whether or not people were visibly present?
Like I said, your biases and preconceptions have led you to assume things that you cannot verify.
We have more than enough information to know that two failures of this magnitude from the USSS in this short period of time in inexcusable when our government has known about plots to take out Trump for at least two years and most likely 4.
Yes, these failures are a terrible look for the Secret Service, and I expect more heads to roll as a result. But a government agency not doing its job properly does not automatically imply maliciousness.
Sealed indictments are used to prevent the suspect from finding out about the investigation prior to their arrest. Once the suspect has been arrested and charged, the indictment must be unsealed. The defendant has a legal and constitutional right to know what he has been charged with and why, and federal charges are matters of public record. Filing charges secretly is one of the hallmarks of authoritarian dictatorships.
 
Reactions: wing2000
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

One nation indivisible
Mar 11, 2017
20,658
15,648
55
USA
✟394,580.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I have in the past at times done that but the response is the same from liberals, immpune the source therefore the fact do not have to be addressed.
The problem is that facts have to be actual facts.

Your first video post turned out to be two low credibility people making grandiose claims of conspiracy. Properly describing it wouldn't have made me want to click on it.

The second video eludes me as to why you posted it. The self-enamored ramblings do not seem to be on topic unless he was about to spout another conspiracy theory. (Which no one wants to hear.)
My "beef" with rumble is that I don't trust the owners and hosts of the site not to be cybercreeps.
 
Upvote 0

comana

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 19, 2005
7,815
4,367
Colorado
✟1,081,854.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I feel the poll question was leading but regardless, responders are just being honest that with Trump out of the picture, in this case an unfortunate assassination, would leave the US better off. It is an extreme way to just ask “ Would the US be better off without Trump as a candidate/ President.“



Obviously the poll is designed to be interpreted, by inference, that those responding yes actually want him killed, but that is not what was actually asked.
 
Upvote 0