I wonder why the philosophy forum has to be closed. Is it because our society has lost its ability to appreciate ideas, over matter?
I have a lot of questions! This is who I am.
Something to consider, Landon, is that there are different forms of Philosophy, and these different forms also have different presuppositions and different goals as a part of their structure.
But even so, as a philosopher myself, one central, very personal concern of mine is over the issue of whether or not the birth of Jesus of Nazareth as a real flesh and blood person is historically a "fact," and I have to wrestle my own felt predilections when I encounter anyone who has a knee-jerk reaction against this fact. And I would tend to downplay their irritation and think to myself, "Why the heck does this bother him/her?"
On the other hand, I can understand where you're grievance could come in philosophically if I were to then get into a discussion about whether or not an unverifiable event like the Resurrection of Jesus Christ can be, or should be, seen as a historical "fact"; I'd like to have the safety zone of being able to express my view without being roundly castigated by someone for my thinking that the Resurrection is a "fact" and that it's important to me emotionally for seeing it as a "fact" .........
If we REALLY wanted to get our feet wet into the tangibleness of your OP topic, I suppose we'd need a topic that we can't talk about, like the efficacy of the Covid vaccine, for example. Now, THAT issue would fit very well with your suggestion that we learn to be willing to listen better to each other, Landon, despite what various people claim are the "facts."