• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

There is no hell.

Status
Not open for further replies.

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
If I understand this correctly Josephus, a historian NOT a Bible scholar claims that Dan 12:2 is NOT the word of God. If this is correct how much more of the OT does Josephus claim is not the word of God?

Am I the only one who can see the contradiction here? If some foreign belief, adopted by the Jews, had been obliterated, how does Josephus know about it?
:angel::angel:

http://www.christianforums.com/t7033640/
Is Josephus considered a reliable Historian?
 
Upvote 0

angelmom01

Veteran
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2006
3,606
273
✟74,119.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
If I understand this correctly Josephus, a historian NOT a Bible scholar claims that Dan 12:2 is NOT the word of God. If this is correct how much more of the OT does Josephus claim is not the word of God?


Am I the only one who can see the contradiction here? If some foreign belief, adopted by the Jews, had been obliterated, how does Josephus know about it?

:confused:

The Daniel reference was made in reference to scripture quoted and no one claimed that it wasn't the word of God, that I can tell. Nor is what I quoted from Josephus.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
[ . . . ]My initial comments (as I recall, anyway) were geared towards the definition of the words that were presented from a Jewish encyclopedia. And they did not cover the full scope of scholarship on the subject, even though the person posting the entry seemed to want to insist that it did.... being unwilling, also, to consider how some of the things that he was being told about the use of the words and their meanings were also contained within the very text he, himself, posted - though he was arguing against such uses.[ . . . ]

Is it your usual practice to make false accusations against other members? If you think any of this is true, address it in the respective post, or we must assume that it is totally false!
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.