• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

[SIZE=+1]Why? I first learned to speak Greek the year of Sputnik I, and studied both Biblical languages at the graduate level 2 decades later. I have several hard bound language resources in my personal library. BDB, BAGD, TWOT, TDNT, Louw-Nida, and many many, electronic resources. I have NOT seen any meaningful interaction with any of the scripture I have posted.[/SIZE]
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
(31) Pharaoh shall see them, and be comforted. over all his multitude, even Pharaoh and all his army slain by the sword, saith the Lord GOD.
Hi there. I also love studying the Biblical Greek and Hebrew and have been doing so for about 6 years.
I like doing word studies in the NT/NC and comparing them to the OT/OC.

One thing I found interesting is the greek word used for "pharisee". It seems to come from the root word for "pharaoh" and they became a type of "Egptians" with the High Priest as a type of "Pharaoh".

I also view them [along with the Sadducees/High Priesthood] in the Jewish/Hebrew book of Revelation along with the OC City of Jerusalem and the Temple. Thoughts?

Exodus 7:11 And Pharaoh however is calling to wise-men and to ones making enchantments/03784 kashaph and they are doing even they sacred scribes of Egypt in occultisms of them so.

Matthew 12:14 And the Pharisees/far-isaioi <5330> having gone forth, held a consultation against Him, how they might destroy Him

Hebrews 11:24 By faith Moses, when he was grown up, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's/faraw <5328> daughter

Revelation 9:21 And not they reform out of the murders of them, nor out from their Sorceries/far-makeiwn <5331>,....

5330. Pharisaios of Hebrew origin (c a separatist, i.e. exclusively religious; a Pharisean, i.e. Jewish sectary:--Pharisee.
5328. Pharao far-ah-o' of foreign origin (6547); Pharao (i.e. Pharoh), an Egyptian king:--Pharaoh.
2447. ios ee-os' perhaps from eimi (to go) or hiemi (to send); rust (as if emitted by metals); also venom (as emitted by serpents):--poison, rust. AV - poison 2, rust 1; 3
 
Upvote 0

JudaicChristian

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2009
1,820
35
✟2,215.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

I do not think your brown driver or twot has done you any good, because you are not paying attention to them.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
[SIZE=-1]My understanding of hell is that it was an invention of the RCC to frighten the illiterate masses into coming to chruch in order to keep the Church coffers full.[/SIZE][/FONT]

[SIZE=+1]Yes, I have heard that too, but I have never seen any credible, verifiable, historical evidence to support it. OTOH I have posted evidence from the Jewish Encyclopedia showing that the ancient Jews, believed in a place of eternal punishment, centuries before the RCC existed. But there are a lot of folks that would rather believe what their leaders tell them, than what the evidence shows.[/SIZE]

 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
[SIZE=-1]I do not think your brown driver or twot has done you any good, because you are not paying attention to them.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=+1]I am not too interested in what you "think." I doubt you even know what the BDB or TWOT are. You have not produced any evidence of any kind to support your claim. Merely saying the equivalent of "I'm right and you're wrong! Am too! Nuh Huh!," over and over and over does NOT make it true. And you have ignored my evidence from the JE showing that the ancient Jews, long before the Christian era, believed in a place of eternal punishment.[/SIZE]
 
Upvote 0

RND

Senior Veteran
Jul 20, 2006
7,807
145
Victorville, California, CorpUSA
Visit site
✟31,272.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
[SIZE=+1] And you have ignored my evidence from the JE showing that the ancient Jews, long before the Christian era, believed in a place of eternal punishment.[/SIZE]

I don't know that quoting the Talmud to get a "picture" of what the Jews thought about "hell" is such a good idea frankly - considering many of the Jewish beliefs were adopted from pagan cultures. Also, the Jewish source provided did not list the modern day (that is in Jesus' day) usage of Gehenna as being the Valley of Hinnom where the refuse and waste of Jerusalem was burned continually.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

[SIZE=+1]Notice how you have to change the meaning of scripture to make it say what you want it to? This is a very common practice of all false religious groups. Why not let scripture say what it says, "They will be tormented (or punished) day and night for ever and ever."

While "hades" has physical properties and could conceivably be thrown somewhere, the same cannot be said of "death." Death is the punctiliar cessation of life, it cannot be thrown anywhere. Someone might say that one is literal the other is figurative, but that is equivocation. There is a scriptural answer which does NOT require supposition.
Rev 6:8 And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.​
In this verse the angel of death and the demon of hell are unleashed on the earth. In 20:14 their powers are taken away and they are cast into the LOF. The angel of death appears in scripture at least twice before. In Exodus when the first born are killed, and in Ezekiel chap. 9.[/SIZE]
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Perhaps we could start a thread on "gehenna"? Of course I would like to also use the Covenantle parable of the "richman/lazarus".
Originally Posted by Gary51
My understanding of hell is that it was an invention of the RCC to frighten the illiterate masses into coming to chruch in order to keep the Church coffers full.

Perhaps the view of eternal hell of the early RCC came from that parable?

Matt 23:33 "Serpents! produce of vipers! how? ye may be fleeing from the judging of the geennhV <1067> "

Luke 16:24 And he sounding said "Father Abraham! be thou merciful to-me! and send Lazarus! that he should be dipping the tip of the finger of him of water and should be cooling down the tongue of me that I am being pained in the Flame this."
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Which shows that you did NOT even read my post. You have NOT given any evidence that, "many of the Jewish beliefs were adopted from pagan cultures." Nor have you provided any evidence that, "the modern day (that is in Jesus' day) usage of Gehenna as being the Valley of Hinnom where the refuse and waste of Jerusalem was burned continually."

May I suggest that you actually read the article, paying particular attention to the red highlights and the blue highlights which show the scripture from which the beliefs derived, i.e. NOT paganism. Let me know if you plan to actually read the article and address it?
 
Upvote 0

RND

Senior Veteran
Jul 20, 2006
7,807
145
Victorville, California, CorpUSA
Visit site
✟31,272.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Which shows that you did NOT even read my post.
I read it. That's why I was able to suggest that quoting from the BabylonianTalmud was probably not a good idea.

You have NOT given any evidence that, "many of the Jewish beliefs were adopted from pagan cultures."
That's because the Bible is full of evidence that the COI adopted the gods and goddesses of the pagan cultures and religious ideas of it's neighbors. I mean seriously. If the COI were willing to sacrifice their children to Molech in the Valley of Himmon don't you think that alone is evidence of adopting pagan beliefs?

Nor have you provided any evidence that, "the modern day (that is in Jesus' day) usage of Gehenna as being the Valley of Hinnom where the refuse and waste of Jerusalem was burned continually."
This is a fairly standard view that virtually all Bible theologians can attest to.

Gehenna - Eastons Bible Dictionary Online

This valley afterwards became the common receptacle for all the refuse of the city. Here the dead bodies of animals and of criminals, and all kinds of filth, were cast and consumed by fire kept always burning. It thus in process of time became the image of the place of everlasting destruction.

GEHENNA in the Bible Encyclopedia - ISBE (Bible History Online)

Gehenna is a transliteration from the Aramaic form of the Hebrew ge-hinnom, "valley of Hinnom." This latter form, however, is rare in the Old Testament, the prevailing name being "the valley of the son of Hinnom." Septuagint usually translates; where it transliterates the form is different from Gehenna and varies. In the New Testament the correct form is Gee'nna with the accent on the penult, not Ge'enna. There is no reason to assume that Hinnom is other than a plain patronymic, although it has been proposed to find in it the corruption of the name of an idol (EB, II, 2071). In the New Testament (King James Version margin) Gehenna occurs in Mt 5:22,29,30; 10:28; 18:9; 23:15,33; Mk 9:43,15,47; Lk 12:5; Jas 3:6. In all of these it designates the place of eternal punishment of the wicked, generally in connection with the final judgment. It is associated with fire as the source of torment. Both body and soul are cast into it. This is not to be explained on the principle that the New Testament speaks metaphorically of the state after death in terms of the body; it presupposes the resurrection. In the King James Version and the Revised Version (British and American) Gehenna is rendered by "hell" (see ESCHATOLOGY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT). That "the valley of Hinnom" became the technical designation for the place of final punishment was due to two causes. In the first place the valley had been the seat of the idolatrous worship of Molech, to whom children were immolated by fire (2 Ch 28:3; 33:6). Secondly, on account of these practices the place was defiled by King Josiah (2 Ki 23:10), and became in consequence associated in prophecy with the judgment to be visited upon the people (Jer 7:32). The fact, also, that the city's offal was collected there may have helped to render the name synonymous with extreme defilement. Topographically the identification of the valley of Hinnom is still uncertain. It has been in turn identified with the depression on the western and southern side of Jerusalem, with the middle valley, and with the valley to the E. Compare EB, II, 2071; DCG, I, 636; RE3, VI.
Geerhardus Vos


Bibliography Information

Orr, James, M.A., D.D. General Editor. "Definition for 'GEHENNA'". "International Standard Bible Encyclopedia". bible-history.com - ISBE; 1915.

Your protests frankly seem quite silly.

May I suggest that you actually read the article, paying particular attention to the red highlights and the blue highlights which show the scripture from which the beliefs derived, i.e. NOT paganism.
If your local newspaper reports on the facts of a case involving a serial killer is that to say that the serial killers beliefs were derived from the paper or possibly another source?

The Bible accurately reported that the COI got many of their beliefs from "pagan" sources.

Let me know if you plan to actually read the article and address it?
I have no plan to address you post from any other angle than what I have taken.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
[SIZE=-1] I read it. That's why I was able to suggest that quoting from the BabylonianTalmud was probably not a good idea. [/SIZE]

And you keep repeating your mantra about the Talmud without addressing any of the scripture.


Your previous comment, possibly deliberately, implied that the O.T. was filled with pagan practices and that virtually all Israel participated in these practices. You failed to note that in every instant where the COI disobeyed, God dealt with them quickly and severely, often with death.


More apparent dishonest quoting. You omitted the following sentences.
It thus in process of time became the image of the place of everlasting destruction. In this sense it is used by our Lord in Matthew 5:22,29,30; 10:28; 18:9; 23:15,33; Mark 9:43,45,47; Luke 12:5. In these passages, and also in James 3:6, the word is uniformly rendered "hell," the Revised Version placing "Gehenna" in the margin. (See HELL; HINNOM .)

See highlights which you seem to have ignored.

[SIZE=-1]Your protests frankly seem quite silly.

If your local newspaper reports on the facts of a case involving a serial killer is that to say that the serial killers beliefs were derived from the paper or possibly another source?[/SIZE]

Not interested in your futile attempts to legitimize your copy/paste of 2d-3d hand sources. The newspapers I read almost universally cite sources, e.g. "The spokesman for "X" said. . . " "A source who wished to remain anonymous said. . ." And they certainly do not make stuff up to fit their assumptions/presuppositions. Also they are talking about current events NOT something that happened more than 1600 years ago.

[SIZE=-1]
The Bible accurately reported that the COI got many of their beliefs from "pagan" sources.[/SIZE]

And there is NOT one single recorded instance of Israel adopting any pagan practice that God did not quickly and severely deal with. So what is your point?


I have no plan to address you post from any other angle than what I have taken.

I will take that as an admission that you cannot deal with anything I have posted and you choose to remain in whatever false teaching you have been been intensely indoctrinated with.[/SIZE]​
 
Upvote 0

RND

Senior Veteran
Jul 20, 2006
7,807
145
Victorville, California, CorpUSA
Visit site
✟31,272.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
And you keep repeating your mantra about the Talmud without addressing any of the scripture.

That's because my point was regarding the Talmud. Here's my point. Unless you are versed in the Talmud maybe it's best not to quote it.

Um, that's basically want the OT is about. And sometimes God didn't deal swiftyly with Israel. That doesn't change the fact that the COI adopted pagan practices. Do you deny that they did?



An image.....

See highlights which you seem to have ignored.
I haven't ignored anything. I understand the difference between distruc"tion" and destruct"ing" and punish"ment" and punish"ing". You seem to have ignored the historcial fact as to how and why the Valley of Hinnom got the name "Gehenna."


Not interested in your futile attempts to legitimize your copy/paste of 2d-3d hand sources.
Does this mean you consider your "cut/paste" jobs from 2002 as being more "hstorically accurate" than the sources I used?



Then it's settled your source from 2002 is no more accurate than the one's I used.

And there is NOT one single recorded instance of Israel adopting any pagan practice that God did not quickly and severely deal with. So what is your point?
God was actually extremely patient with Israel and Judah and the fact that these cultures accepted and adopted pagan practices.

I will take that as an admission that you cannot deal with anything I have posted and you choose to remain in whatever false teaching you have been been intensely indoctrinated with.
Sounds like sour grapes if you ask me. Or a kid that wants to take his ball and go home.​
 
Upvote 0

RND

Senior Veteran
Jul 20, 2006
7,807
145
Victorville, California, CorpUSA
Visit site
✟31,272.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
[SIZE=+1]
Jewish Encyclopedia, GEHENNA
by : Kaufmann Kohler Ludwig Blau


Copyright 2002 JewishEncyclopedia.com. All rights reserved.

JewishEncyclopedia.com - GEHENNA
[/SIZE]

What makes this "cut/paste" job significant in any way? I mean it is from 2002 is it not? How can we consider this in any way historically factual or significant in any way? Where Kaufmann Kohler or Ludwig Blau even there? So how would they know? Frankly this "is not credible, verifiable, historical evidence. These are 20th century writings."
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

I suggest you try actually reading the article. You keep complaining about me quoting the Talmud. Where did you get that idea? Is it not true that the Talmud, i.e. a primary source was referenced several times in the article? And were you to actually read the article you would have seen several passages of scripture, I highlighted in blue, and other citations. And further if you had clicked on the link you would have seen that the article was much longer than what I quoted, and at the bottom was an extensive bibliography of works cited. An encyclopedia is a standard reference work, a random website with 2d-3d hand quotes without full bibliographic references is not.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
That's because my point was regarding the Talmud. Here's my point. Unless you are versed in the Talmud maybe it's best not to quote it.

You keep accusing me of quoting the Talmud, a deliberate false accusation. I did NOT quote the Talmud! I quoted a standard reference work, the Jewish Encyclopedia which made some reference to the Talmud and other resources. If you cannot tell the difference perhaps you should excuse yourself from this discussion until you are able to recognize that very important distinction.

Um, that's basically want the OT is about. And sometimes God didn't deal swiftyly with Israel. That doesn't change the fact that the COI adopted pagan practices. Do you deny that they did?

Can you show me even one instance where Israel was involved in any pagan practice, where God did NOT deal with them quickly and severely?

An image.....

Meaningless quibble which ignores the meaning expressed by the full article.
I haven't ignored anything. I understand the difference between distruc"tion" and destruct"ing" and punish"ment" and punish"ing".

I'm sorry I do not require tutoring in English from heretical quibblings, which did NOT exist prior to the early 20th century. There is NO, ZERO, NONE evidence in scripture that any writer was making such a distinction. And of course the entire early church writings refute this heretical view. I wonder how the church got it wrong for 2000 years but EW and her cronies got it right in the 20th century?

You seem to have ignored the historcial fact as to how and why the Valley of Hinnom got the name "Gehenna."

A blatantly false accusation. I think I have included the origin in my posts at least 3-4 times. The etymology of the name is NOT relevant. See your own quotes from the ISBE and Easton's, above.

Does this mean you consider your "cut/paste" jobs from 2002 as being more "hstorically accurate" than the sources I used?

The JE was last copyrighted in 2002. But you failed to actually read the article, making meaningless, irrelevant objections. There were many historical citations included in the article and an extensive bibliography at the end of the complete article which you have not read.

Then it's settled your source from 2002 is no more accurate than the one's I used.

See above. I quoted a thoroughly documented standard reference work, you quoted a bunch of 2d-3d hand misquoted, misrepresented stuff from a random website.
God was actually extremely patient with Israel and Judah and the fact that these cultures accepted and adopted pagan practices.

Can you show even one pagan practice which Israel may have been involved in that God did NOT quickly and severely deal with? Since the answer is no, your argument means abso-diddly squat..

Sounds like sour grapes if you ask me. Or a kid that wants to take his ball and go home.

You quite evidently don't know the difference between a researched, peer reviewed standard reference work such as an encyclopedia and a buncha stuff misquoted, misrepresented, and even made up posted on some random website.
 
Upvote 0

RND

Senior Veteran
Jul 20, 2006
7,807
145
Victorville, California, CorpUSA
Visit site
✟31,272.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I suggest you try actually reading the article.
I'm rejecting based on your standards for rejection. It was written in the 21st Century by people that "weren't there."

You keep complaining about me quoting the Talmud. Where did you get that idea?
Notice the numbers next to some of the quotes your source claimed? Those are references to the Talmud.

Is it not true that the Talmud, i.e. a primary source was referenced several times in the article?
Yes, that is true. That why I said what I said. It probably isn't the best source.

So? Using your criteria that means nothing really. Now you are in "qualifying" mode.
 
Upvote 0

JudaicChristian

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2009
1,820
35
✟2,215.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
This is what the problem is: You have these books that tell you what the correct translation is, and yet you continue to use the unbiblical word in your argument. If the correct translation is grave, pit, or Gehenna, then why argue for the interpretation of hell. As a matter of history, Pagan and Gnostics have tried to control Judaism from day one.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

The problem is you are NOT even reading what I post, just posting endless, meaningless argumentation without addressing anything I said. I would be most appreciative if you could show me where I translated anything as "hell." You have NOT provided any language resource of any kind period, so your objection is meaningless.
G1067 &#947;&#949;&#769;&#949;&#957;&#957;&#945; geenna
Thayer Definition:
1) Hell is the place of the future punishment call “Gehenna” or “Gehenna of fire”. This was originally the valley of Hinnom, south of Jerusalem, where the filth and dead animals of the city were cast out and burned; a fit symbol of the wicked and their future destruction.
Part of Speech: noun feminine
A Related Word by Thayer’s/Strong’s Number: of Hebrew origin H1516 and H2011
Citing in TDNT: 1:657, 113

Theological Dictionary of the New Testament géenna Gehenna

1. géenna is the Greek form of the Hebrew name for the Wadi er-Rababi. This acquired a bad reputation because of the sacrifices offered to Moloch there (2 Kgs. 16:3). Judgment was pronounced on it (Jer. 7:32), and it thus came to be equated with the hell of the last judgment (Eth. En. 90:26). Later it was also used for the place where the wicked are punished in the intermediate state. The LXX, Philo, and Josephus do not have the term; Philo has tártaros instead.

2. The NT distinguishes between hád&#275;s and géenna: a. the former is temporary, the latter definitive (cf. Mark 9:43, 48); b. the former is for the soul alone, the latter for the reunited body and soul (Mark 9:43ff.; Matt. 10:28). géenna is preexistent (Matt. 25:41). It is manifested as a fiery abyss (Mark 9:43) after the general resurrection. Those who fall victim to divine judgment (Matt. 5:22; 23:33) will be destroyed there with eternal fire. The ungodly are sons of géenna (Matt. 23:15). They go to it with Satan and the demons (Matt. 25:41; cf. Rev. 19:20; 20:10-11). The threat of géenna in the NT is used to show the seriousness of sin and to awaken the conscience to fear of the divine anger (Matt. 10:28; 23:33). Even contemptuous words must be avoided (Matt. 5:22); no sacrifice is too costly in the war against sin (Mark 9:43ff.).
J. JEREMIAS, I, 657–58
&#8594; ai&#7763;nios, pýr​
As a matter of history, Pagan and Gnostics have tried to control Judaism from day one.

This may or may not be true, but it is totally irrelevant to anything.
 
Upvote 0

JudaicChristian

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2009
1,820
35
✟2,215.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

Are you going to tell me that you have not heard of the Gnostic Gospels?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.