Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
HUH?
It is a well documented fact that Pagans and Gnostic's have tried destroying Christianity from within. Besides that do you trust the Catholic Church to CANonize scripture?So you're saying Jesus didn't tell the parable?
It is a well documented fact that Pagans and Gnostic's have tried destroying Christianity from within. Besides that do you trust the Catholic Church to CANonize scripture?
I have a collection of bibles. But besides that I study history and archaeology.That was pretty much my reaction, too.
Makes me wonder what bible MtA has been reading all this time. And what else is missing from it.
I don't trust their translations/interpretations.It is a well documented fact that Pagans and Gnostic's have tried destroying Christianity from within. Besides that do you trust the Catholic Church to CANonize scripture?
What do you mean Covenantle?I don't trust their translations/interpretations.
What other parables do you reject out of the Gospels? I view this parable as a "Covenantle" parable.
Luke 16:26 And on all of these, between Us [NC Faith/Life] and Ye [OC Law/Death] a great chasm hath been established, so that those willing to cross-over/diabhnai <1224> (5629) hence toward ye not be able to, no yet thence toward us may be ferrying/diaperwsin <1276>.
Hebrews 11:29 By Faith They crossed-over/diebhsan <1224> (5627) the Red Sea as thru Dry: which the Egyptians assaying to do were drowned.
I do have some what of a list of corrupt scriptures. For example:I don't trust their translations/interpretations.
What other parables do you reject out of the Gospels? I view this parable as a "Covenantle" parable.
Luke 16:26 And on all of these, between Us [NC Faith/Life] and Ye [OC Law/Death] a great chasm hath been established, so that those willing to cross-over/diabhnai <1224> (5629) hence toward ye not be able to, no yet thence toward us may be ferrying/diaperwsin <1276>.
Hebrews 11:29 By Faith They crossed-over/diebhsan <1224> (5627) the Red Sea as thru Dry which the Egyptians assaying to do were drowned.
Change of Priesthoods. The same way I view RevelationWhat do you mean Covenantle?
Darned if that isn't an arbitrary and capricious perspective. It must be a corruption because you can't account for it.It appears to be a Gnostic corruption because it does not agree with scripture.
Change of Priesthoods. The same way I view Revelation
Hebrews 7:12 For being translated/metatiqemenhV<3346> (5746) the Priesthood, out of necessity also of Law a translation/metaqesiV <3331> is becoming/ginetai <1096> (5736)
Luke 21:31 Thus also ye whenever ye may be seeing these-things becoming/ginwskete <1097> (5720) ye are knowing that nigh/egguV <1451> is the Kingdom of the God
Darned if that isn't an arbitrary and capricious perspective. It must be a corruption because you can't account for it.
UNlike the story of the adulterous woman, which some say was added after the fact, there is no such view unto the Lazarus story.
Furthermore, there is nothing in the story which disdains flesh or elevates spirit or dualism.
Ergo, you have no basis for your stated argument, except to wave away a parable that is very troubling to your pet theories.
Read thru Galatian 5.......And how does the word Covenantle relate to Lazarus?
Sure- poduce the autographs, or even any significant fragment from the first century, then we'll have a standard by which to critique the received and/or critical texts.And that is what I am talking about. And worst than that is any hanky panky during the canonization of scriptures. Obvilously when there is a contradiction there needs to be some investigation for the truth.
If he did tell a story like that, then some one altered the words because they do not agree with scripture. Personally I do not think Jesus spoke those words. I think some Gnostic was distorting scripture.The old texts have the story. Kinda doubt the Catholics could've messed with those.
And you didn't answer the question. Do you really believe that Jesus never spoke that story?
Sure- poduce the autographs, or even any significant fragment from the first century, then we'll have a standard by which to critique the received and/or critical texts.
Short of that, the same people who canonized scripture are the same people who gave you the lion's share of even that which is incorporated in the critical text- which, btw, does not vary significantly/theologically from the RT. In short, your insinuations read like Dan Brown.
Heaven and hell were both quite unfamiliar to the Jews prior to the Exile. Subsequent to same, Hellenism influenced the thinking of Rabbis and scribes.What you do not know is that Hell is not a original teaching of Judaism. It only stated being introduced by the Hellenistic and Kabbalistic Jews coming out of Babylon.
If he did tell a story like that, then some one altered the words because they do not agree with scripture. Personally I do not think Jesus spoke those words. I think some Gnostic was distorting scripture.
Are the same monotheistic? Yes? We shall reject the Shema, forthwith.Here is a simple question that can be answered. Do Pagans, Hellenist, Kabbalist and Gnostics believe in Hell?
I understand the scriptures, but anyway lets let this one go bye bye. OKRead thru Galatian 5.......
Galatian 4:25 For the Hagar, Sinai Mount is in the Arabia is together-elemental/su-stoicei <4960> (5719) yet to the now Jurusalem in servitude with the offsprings of Her .26 The yet above Jerusalem free whoany is Mother of all of us.
Revelation 12:1 And Sign, great was seen in the heaven a Woman having been about-cast/peri-beblhmenh <4016> (5772) the sun and the moon underneath of the feet of her
Reve 17:4 And the Woman was having been about-cast/peri-beblhmenh <4016> (5772) purple and scarlet/kokkinw <2847> and having been gilded to gold and stone, precious, and pearls,
That is off topic........I do have some what of a list of corrupt scriptures. For example:
Mark 16
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?