- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
They do that on earth. Show proof it applies in deep space.It is how the entirety of science is done. If you don't think science and the scientific method is useful, then you need to get outside more often.
If wavelengths from the red portion of the spectrum produce your sensation of blueness, then your hypothesis is incorrect. Ultimately, scientists report empirically measured wavelengths as their data, not their subjective judgment of color.
Why would you want to "understand the universe" when all that is in the world...is not of the Father? 1 John 2:16.......changing fables of scienctism would I think be more correct. Science properly understood and used is a very strong tool for understanding the universe. Many scientists turn the tool into a 'religion' which amounts to atheism and is all about promoting the 'faith' no matter what.
They do that on earth. Show proof it applies in deep space.
Describe why you have none at all, but offer same state past beliefs constantly?Describe evidence that you would accept.
Nevertheless offering the same state pastdunnit is all loudmouth ever does. No way to deny it. hilarious.The more things change, the more they stay the same.
There is no evidence for any other past. All you can claim is that your poor translation of the Bible is wrong if there was no altered state. Your personal vanity is not a valid reason to believe in such a state.Nevertheless offering the same state pastdunnit is all loudmouth ever does. No way to deny it. hilarious.
None for any state past.There is no evidence for any other past.
You post some I read some..ho humYou win lose, you some some.
None for any state past.
Explain how present physics matches with the heaven and future in scripture?
I marvel at the religious abilities of so many here on various threads, to make anything up and pass it off as god told me...I marvel at the scientific abilities of so many here on the various threads. But science could no more explain creation, than a child could explain birth...without factoring in a mother. Perhaps that is the definition of brilliance.
The change was from what was before, not a change in what now is. As for bible, your long term blasphemy and slander of Scripture eliminates you from being worthy of listening to.Actually there is plenty of evidence that supports the concept that there has been no change. Sadly you do not understand the concept of evidence. I can help you with that.
And as to your question, the answer is simple. It doesn't. You are making the mistake of reinterpreting the Bible in light of our present knowledge.
Since I started the analogy of children not factoring in a mother...then, I would have to say that it makes perfect sense that you all would not believe in a mother unless you yourself had one or at least knew one...hypothetically speaking, of course.I marvel at the religious abilities of so many here on various threads, to make anything up and pass it off as god told me...
meh', there's one born every minute, I guess.
Of course? Of course what? Of course, children not knowing there is such a thing as a mother, would have to BE TOLD and LEARN from someone else, and in NO WAY be able to access their own origin otherwise?Of course.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?