There is no Creation Debate

[dad]

It is how the entirety of science is done. If you don't think science and the scientific method is useful, then you need to get outside more often.



If wavelengths from the red portion of the spectrum produce your sensation of blueness, then your hypothesis is incorrect. Ultimately, scientists report empirically measured wavelengths as their data, not their subjective judgment of color.

They do that on earth. Show proof it applies in deep space.

 

[HitchSlap]

No thanks. Speaking of not worrying what others think....You can cork it on matters of faith in God.

From name calling to bullying. Nice.

 

[ScottA]

.......changing fables of scienctism would I think be more correct. Science properly understood and used is a very strong tool for understanding the universe. Many scientists turn the tool into a 'religion' which amounts to atheism and is all about promoting the 'faith' no matter what.

Why would you want to "understand the universe" when all that is in the world...is not of the Father? 1 John 2:16

...We give WAY too much consideration to the ways of the world, and it is not even our directive from God, but is contrary.

 

[Loudmouth]

They do that on earth. Show proof it applies in deep space.

Describe evidence that you would accept.

 

[dad]

Describe evidence that you would accept.

Describe why you have none at all, but offer same state past beliefs constantly?

 

[HitchSlap]

Describe why you have none at all, but offer same state past beliefs constantly?

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

 

[dad]

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Nevertheless offering the same state pastdunnit is all loudmouth ever does. No way to deny it. hilarious.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Nevertheless offering the same state pastdunnit is all loudmouth ever does. No way to deny it. hilarious.

There is no evidence for any other past. All you can claim is that your poor translation of the Bible is wrong if there was no altered state. Your personal vanity is not a valid reason to believe in such a state.

 

[dad]

There is no evidence for any other past.

None for any state past.
Explain how present physics matches with the heaven and future in scripture?

 

[HitchSlap]

Nevertheless offering the same state pastdunnit is all loudmouth ever does. No way to deny it. hilarious.

You win lose, you some some.

 

[dad]

You win lose, you some some.

You post some I read some..ho hum

 

[ScottA]

I marvel at the scientific abilities of so many here on the various threads. But science could no more explain creation, than a child could explain birth...without factoring in a mother. Perhaps that is the definition of brilliance.

 

[Subduction Zone]

None for any state past.
Explain how present physics matches with the heaven and future in scripture?

Actually there is plenty of evidence that supports the concept that there has been no change. Sadly you do not understand the concept of evidence. I can help you with that.


And as to your question, the answer is simple. It doesn't. You are making the mistake of reinterpreting the Bible in light of our present knowledge.

 

[HitchSlap]

I marvel at the scientific abilities of so many here on the various threads. But science could no more explain creation, than a child could explain birth...without factoring in a mother. Perhaps that is the definition of brilliance.

I marvel at the religious abilities of so many here on various threads, to make anything up and pass it off as god told me...
meh', there's one born every minute, I guess.

 

[HitchSlap]

You post some I read some..ho hum

Back at ya' kid.

 

[dad]

Actually there is plenty of evidence that supports the concept that there has been no change. Sadly you do not understand the concept of evidence. I can help you with that.


And as to your question, the answer is simple. It doesn't. You are making the mistake of reinterpreting the Bible in light of our present knowledge.

The change was from what was before, not a change in what now is. As for bible, your long term blasphemy and slander of Scripture eliminates you from being worthy of listening to.

 

[ScottA]

I marvel at the religious abilities of so many here on various threads, to make anything up and pass it off as god told me...
meh', there's one born every minute, I guess.

Since I started the analogy of children not factoring in a mother...then, I would have to say that it makes perfect sense that you all would not believe in a mother unless you yourself had one or at least knew one...hypothetically speaking, of course.

 

[HitchSlap]

Since I started the analogy of children not factoring in a mother...then, I would have to say that it makes perfect sense that you all would not believe in a mother unless you yourself had one or at least knew one...hypothetically speaking, of course.

Of course.

 

[HitchSlap]

The change was from what was before, not a change in what now is. As for bible, your long term blasphemy and slander of Scripture eliminates you from being worthy of listening to.

Thus, yea have spoken, so be it.

 

[ScottA]

Of course.

Of course? Of course what? Of course, children not knowing there is such a thing as a mother, would have to BE TOLD and LEARN from someone else, and in NO WAY be able to access their own origin otherwise?