Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Oh my goodness C, you can't say this.I think man is actually more evil than the devil.. or has shown to be. When we start looking back in history, whether world history or just something as small as domestic history.. we've beaten Satan on it.
Respectfully, the darkness upon the face of the deep is about earth's purpose in the creation, so it did not predate them. We should consider that the angels are watching something about to be played out in a temporal reality on earth that will inform them of Who God is and also inform them of who they are in relation to Him. Therefore the darkness on the face of the deep and God's Spirit moving on the face of the waters means that God is going to reveal His Light in the midst of a darkness so as to cause the created to worship Him in Spirit and Truth through the revelation. What will be revealed in the deep is God Himself.
The darkness is not the evil, it is the absence of God's Light, the knowledge of God as pertains to the value of His Spiritual Person and Character. The evil is the product of vanity in the creation which occurs in the void of this Light/knowledge. For example, how did Satan fall? Because he became vain due to his beauty in contrast to others. Had he been thankful to God for the beauty rather than counting himself better than others in vainglory (as if he deserved it or earned it), there would have been no fall from his high place. His words indicate that he assumed God was worshipped because God had the greater power rather than God was the goodness.
Remember that the angels fell because they left their former stations in an misinformed envy of those lower than themselves. Hence Satan despised the fact that Adam was content in his station under God while Satan was not, even though Satan was higher than Adam.
Oh my goodness C, you can't say this.
Think of Hitler...the devil is what caused him to be like he was and the devil is hundreds of times worse.
Hitler had a tiny bit of love in him,,,at least for that woman he loved. The devil has NO LOVE in him,,,we can't even imagine what that's like.
I understand your point,,,I just wouldn't say it in those terms that you used.
I believe Calvinism changes the nature of God.About ¼ as long and quit readable judging by my responses.
He doesn’t – nor did I say He did. I thought I covered that.
Oh wait – here it is:
How can a person not consider and present their theology when they’re talking about the source of evil? When talking about something in the politics’ portion of the forum perhaps. But not in a section that has “theology” in it’s very title.
I always put “free will” in quotes when talking theology.. The reason is quite simple.
So long as donkeys speak Hebrew, Caiaphas prophesies the words of God, and men move by the Holy Spirit write the very words of God – in fact, so long as we live and move and have being in God - “free will” will always be relative.
Whatever theological bent you see coming through that is simply the facts of life according to the scriptures.
That’s a subject to be considered by every Christian I suppose. I already gave you my opinion on the matter.
Some not so much apparently.
No – He is not a wicked and mean God. Did someone say He was?
Which one would that be?
No – God sends forth His Word to accomplish what so ever He desires to be done.
I thought I covered that.
Flaws – undoubtedly – but you haven’t pointed any of them out.
Some more than others apparently.
No one, with the exception of Satan perhaps, would say that God is wicked and mean.
Of course. Did someone say otherwise?
Look –although the OP did, I haven’t chosen to list any theological group that I might be affiliated with.
But – having been around the block a few times here in the forum – judging by your belligerent attitude, I believe you are an anti-Calvinist and you assumed that I am a Calvinist because I referenced the “elect of God” in my post as well as the before mentioned “sovereignty” word.
If this is the case – let me put your mind to rest. I am not a Calvinist. God’s elect is a term God uses in the scriptures to describe His people. It is not something that Calvinists or any other group made up.
Nor is the sovereignty of God something which is in the theology of Calvinists only. As you so rightly pointed out, everyone believes in the sovereignty of God.
But as I so rightly pointed out – apparently some more than others.
Maybe these are the angels...?
So where do YOU believe evil comes from?no. I don't go for "the devil made me do it". Hitler's doing was his own decision rooted from his pov's and other things that where built from his life. "The devil made me do it" is one of the worse excuses in existence today.
Time is temporal. What is Eternal and Holy can never actually be proven. Picture a person trying to follow a line that goes on forever so as to prove it goes on forever. It is impossible so faith is necessary. Now picture a person following a line that goes on forever to prove that it ends. Again this is futile but this essentially is unfaith or eternal cynicism or eternal darkness. But still you're right in a sense. What is proven in time is the consequences of unbelief in the Holy Image of God, or in negative terminology, the belief in a corrupt image of god (One which is invented through carnal values). Hence we experience corruption, sin, evil, death in this world because we believed in a false image of god presented in the Garden of Eden by Satan.Can never be proven in time...maybe...?
*Scripture is proof enough, for me though...
If evil came about as a reaction to what God did...wouldn't that mean that evil came from NOTHING?
I think that no matter how you stir the soup, evil will never come out of it.
I just think we can't know...but the conversations about this is always interesting.
You bring up some points which are going to be problematic.
God created the angels, of which one of them turned out to be the enemy. How could God...who is perfect...create something that is NOT perfect? This is a problem. Man makes imperfect things because he has the sin nature in him and this is passed on to everything he makes..even nature has sin in it as per Romans 8:19-22 ...all of creation waits eagerly for the redemption.
It's apparent that evil existed BEFORE God created the angels and Lucifer...THIS is the problem faced by Christianity.
And IF the angels did NOT have a chance,,,then we are definitely stating that God created evil.
Now, in the O.T. (Isaiah 45) it states that God created everything even evil (calamity). We can attribute this to the fact that the O.T. population attributed everything to God...both the good and the bad.
I've followed the rabbit down many trails and they all end up with a big sign that says: No Answer Here.
The universe was created out of nothing, but God created it. And, look....it also has evil in it. Asteroids colliding into moons, planets, each other.In a demonstrative sense, I suppose you could say that's true. "Evil" (or darkness) came out of "nothing". Yet the universe was created out of "nothing" also.
So fair question to ask? Is darkness than a secondary reaction of the created thing itself, or a primary reaction to God's creating? That would take a bit of "meeting out"; yet either way, I don't see how that would make God responsible for evil.
You follow me here?
I would agree. Evil is "inherent" in this current created world.
Is it truly "knowable" - eventually I believe this question will be known for sure. (If only on the other side of eternity.) Am I satisfied enough with my "theory" that the question doesn't bother me? Yes I am. It might not be the "full answer" but it's a "good enough" one for now. - If that makes sense to you?
The universe was created out of nothing, but God created it. And, look....it also has evil in it. Asteroids colliding into moons, planets, each other.
You always get back to square one.
You're right as to evil being inherent in our world system.
If you've come up with an answer that is good for you...you've taken a big step. I thought I did too many years ago...but I've come to realize I was wrong and simplistic. (I was a new Christian).
I think this is one of those questions that boggle the mind and might cause it to explode!
No sir!No, it's not a problem, God alone is perfect, which means He is not lacking in any way, He is self-sufficient and not dependent upon any other. God calls his creation good, and good does not entail the notion of God creating God.
As a conceptual non-materialized reality?
Only if pantheism were true, which it is not, so we have to distinguish between the will of God and the will of His creatures and first causes and secondary causal agents.
Natural evil vs moral evil.
Something tells me though, you'll try to educate me with answers.
So where do YOU believe evil comes from?
Was Hitler an evil man?
WHAT made him be like that?
Is evil also in nature?
WHAT put the evil in nature?
I am correct. Evil was not on the face of the deep - darkness was.You very well may be correct that "darkness" is not the same as "evil"....
Which is not the case......if evil is simply what comes to be the physical manifestation of darkness in the world.
I can receive that.Darkness has to have a cause because before God created anything, darkness did not exist. There is no shadow of turning in God, so darkness had to come from somewhere; as a result of within the context of the created order.
As they like to say at Geico - "Everyone knows that"........but angels were not eternally existent either,
That wasn't me.Now what you say about angels watching the creation of earth; (I think it was you who said that; but may not have been?) in order to have God's glory demonstrated to them in the creation of life. This would only make applicable sense if they were not aware they were created also. I'm pretty sure that isn't the case though.
Not really.Well then you would need to define what this means.
Again - everyone knows that.They work in conjunction but are separate persons.
I am known fully - therefore I will know fully.Note it says "I shall know fully." but does not define "know what" fully, other than "as I am known".
Perhaps in the form we now exist.Because we are created entities there is a limit to the fullness of the knowledge that we are known; and these limits are because we are created.
I do follow you.Now the second person of the Trinity shares our "createdness"; and so we shall fully know Him in His createdness as He knows us in our createdness. Because we are created, we do not have the capacity to know God in His eternal essence. Follow me here?
While I don't claim to be a Calvinist - I don't believe it does.I believe Calvinism changes the nature of God.
Did you mean to say "evil was not always existent?.......what we on this thread don't seem to understand is that evil always was. It would seem that God DID create it...but we know from scripture that He couldn't have...
So: The question remains open.
Then the premise of your argument fails. God is not bound by physics. Just because God acted does not mean that there has to be an equal and opposite reaction.I did state specifically that evil is not equal to God because evil is not omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, eternal or immortal.
Evil is not a thing in itself. It is a corruption of something that is good. Like a moth hole in a sweater. The hole is not a thing in itself. It is an absence of sweater that ought to be there. Good must exist in order for evil to exist in the sense that there must be a goodness that can be corrupted. Nothing is entirely evil. A fully moth eaten sweater is just a hanger in the closet. Someone who is utterly depraved is still good in the sense that they were created in the image of God. Even Lucifer is good in the sense that he was an angel of God. So the issue is not that evil must exist if good exists. Rather, it is possible for good to exist without evil, however, it is impossible for evil to exist without good.Evil is a "thing" confined to this current universe that will be overcome by God.
"Good" in the context of the created order is actually overpowered by evil. This is what the fall is about. This is why man can not save himself. This is why after the choice was made to transgress, human will was no longer free. "Will" now is encumbered by sin and also encumbered by the consequences of the fall.
I never said God is responsible for the fall. I said that God was responsible for making it possible. We are responsible for making it actual.How is God responsible for the fall, when Adam was the one who chose, of his own free will mind you! - to eat the fruit?
Not necessary. Just a one force/power equal to and at odds with another force/power. In regards to the OP, it was suggesting that evil is a force/power that is "an equal and opposite reaction to" good.That's not the description of dualism....
Dualism means there's
a good god and a bad god.
Then the premise of your argument fails. God is not bound by physics. Just because God acted does not mean that there has to be an equal and opposite reaction.
Evil is not a thing in itself. It is a corruption of something that is good. Like a moth hole in a sweater. The hole is not a thing in itself. It is an absence of sweater that ought to be there. Good must exist in order for evil to exist in the sense that there must be a goodness that can be corrupted. Nothing is entirely evil. A fully moth eaten sweater is just a hanger in the closet. Someone who is utterly depraved is still good in the sense that they were created in the image of God. Even Lucifer is good in the sense that he was an angel of God. So the issue is not that evil must exist if good exists. Rather, it is possible for good to exist without evil, however, it is impossible for evil to exist without good.
I never said God is responsible for the fall. I said that God was responsible for making it possible. We are responsible for making it actual.
I am correct. Evil was not on the face of the deep - darkness was.
Which is not the case.
I can receive that.
But I was talking about where it comes from in the created order.
As they like to say at Geico - "Everyone knows that".
That wasn't me.
Not really.
You seem to be objecting on the basis of me saying that the Holy Spirit supposedly was nonexistent before He was created. I have said no such thing. My pointed use of the word "eternally" takes care of that misconception.
Eternal generation is a theological term often used in Reformed circles. Probably not the best one but commonly used when speaking of the Trinity. One theological source (only as an example) puts it this way.
"The eternal generation of the Son is defined as "an eternal personal act of the Father, wherein, by necessity of nature, not by choice of will, He generates the person (not the essence) of the Son, by communicating to Him the whole indivisible substance of the Godhead, without division, alienation, or change, so that the Son is the express image of His Father's person, and eternally continues, not from the Father, but in the Father, and the Father in the Son."
Again - everyone knows that.
I am known fully - therefore I will know fully.
Perhaps in the form we now exist.
But perhaps in our glorified state, as the body of Christ, that will not be a limitation. We simply don't know.
I do follow you.
The difference is that the Son of God who is in the busom of the Father explains Him.
"No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him." John 1:18
I've got to leave town for a while. Have fun with the thread.
The laws of physics are not angels any more than we are the laws of physics. LOL
The laws of physics govern the operation of the universe. That is not the purpose of angels. The laws of physics are like the engine of the car. God is driving and we and angels are passengers.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?