Hi there,
So I finally got what I was looking for, in terms of Evolution: I have a theological interpretation.
"Unsounded Evolution" is that which activates the neurological core of a creature, via an expectation of resurgence.
The point of it being "unsounded" is that the activation is not less than neutral, by which the necessary "newness" of an adaptation can be captured.
In Evolutionary terminology, the gravitas of a 'mutation' (by which it is believed the impetus for an adaptation is mysteriously adventuated, that is, by necessity) is outstripped by the newness of an adaptation able to be sustained by the word of identification that drives it (that is, by inkling that is prosense).
I hope you understand this, as suggesting that neutrality of word is able to adapt more quickly and liquidly than a succession of mutations.
Thanks.
So I finally got what I was looking for, in terms of Evolution: I have a theological interpretation.
"Unsounded Evolution" is that which activates the neurological core of a creature, via an expectation of resurgence.
The point of it being "unsounded" is that the activation is not less than neutral, by which the necessary "newness" of an adaptation can be captured.
In Evolutionary terminology, the gravitas of a 'mutation' (by which it is believed the impetus for an adaptation is mysteriously adventuated, that is, by necessity) is outstripped by the newness of an adaptation able to be sustained by the word of identification that drives it (that is, by inkling that is prosense).
I hope you understand this, as suggesting that neutrality of word is able to adapt more quickly and liquidly than a succession of mutations.
Thanks.