Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Well, my having witnessed first-hand two unequivocal miracles is slightly more than a "heart and feelings" issue. There's also a series of videos called Transformations which have documented miracles from the four corners of the Earth.[/color]
You have as much evidence to justify your belief as any extremist muslim does.....which is no evidence whatsoever. You reference your bible and your "heart and feelings" to justify your belief, which is exactly what anyone can do to justify their belief. There is no difference in the evidence you have for your belief and the evidence that extremeist muslims have.
But people still had God. Are you saying morality is intrinsic in all people to the same degree? Is morality created by some sort of societal critical mass?My morality comes from using my brain to figure out that if I hope to be treated well by others....I should probably treat others well. No bible involved, it's just common sense. People have led moral lives without the bible for centuries, and they will as long as human beings walk the earth.
Of course atheism is a belief, and it's just a question of semantics how you make it sound. It's the belief that there is no God. And it only a belief as you can't prove a negative.Straw man argument.
People that kill for religion kill in the name of their religion, but the people you listed above did not kill in the name of atheism. I don't know how else to say it to christians that atheism is not a belief. If you say that you don't believe in unicorns, that makes you an aunicornist. Does that mean I can tell anything else about you other than that you don't believe in unicorns? No. The people you listed above were power hugry jerks, religious or no, and it had nothing to do with atheism. If you want to bring up people that have killed millions in the name of religion, we can start another thread if you wish.
But your version of "trying" involves converting everyone to your set of beliefs, which is wrong.
They're not unproven. There is more than enough evidence to support the veracity of Jesus, and God.My compromise is to let everyone continue to believe what they choose, but to not interfere with anyone else's lives. Your set of unproven beliefs cannot dictate how someone else lives their life.
Well, my having witnessed first-hand two unequivocal miracles is slightly more than a "heart and feelings" issue. There's also a series of videos called Transformations which have documented miracles from the four corners of the Earth.
Non-Christians often then debate whether that means the miracle *actually* happened, and the simple answer is yes. You don't need to have witnessed it for it to be true, and unless this is to become a debate about the nature of reality, and existentialism, miracles DO happen. That's fact.
But people still had God. Are you saying morality is intrinsic in all people to the same degree? Is morality created by some sort of societal critical mass?
Of course atheism is a belief, and it's just a question of semantics how you make it sound. It's the belief that there is no God. And it only a belief as you can't prove a negative.
But, no, it's not a strawman argument. Take Hitler, for example. There he was, reading Nietzsche's books - which stated God didn't exist. In fact, he was the first to say "God is dead". Hitler drank it all in and introduced Mussolini to his writings.
So Nietzsche's saying God is dead, in which case there's no reason to behave as if He does. You may as well do what you want because there's no moral arbiter, anymore. This is a quote of Hitler's: "I freed Germany from the stupid and degrading fallacies of conscience and morality... "
His belief that there was no God allowed him to believe morality was now moot, and that's what gave him "permission" in his eyes to do what he did.
They're not unproven. There is more than enough evidence to support the veracity of Jesus, and God.
How do you suggest we remove Christianity's influence on society? Scratch our laws? Alter what we class as years? Decide it's no longer 2007?
How do you see that actually working?
[/color]You have as much evidence to justify your belief as any extremist muslim does.....which is no evidence whatsoever.
You reference your bible and your "heart and feelings" to justify your belief, which is exactly what anyone can do to justify their belief.
There is no difference in the evidence you have for your belief and the evidence that extremeist muslims have.
My morality comes from using my brain to figure out that if I hope to be treated well by others....I should probably treat others well.
No bible involved, it's just common sense.
People have led moral lives without the bible for centuries, and they will as long as human beings walk the earth.
People that kill for religion kill in the name of their religion, but the people you listed above did not kill in the name of atheism.
I don't know how else to say it to christians that atheism is not a belief. If you say that you don't believe in unicorns, that makes you an aunicornist.
Does that mean I can tell anything else about you other than that you don't believe in unicorns? No. The people you listed above were power hugry jerks, religious or no, and it had nothing to do with atheism.
If you want to bring up people that have killed millions in the name of religion, we can start another thread if you wish.
But your version of "trying" involves converting everyone to your set of beliefs, which is wrong.
Do you need to assume I'm ignorant scientifically to disprove my point? What if it turns out I'm not ignorant?I'm sure primitive man thought fire was miraculous as well. My point is that just because someone is ignorant of science, how things work, and what's scientifically possible, doesn't mean what they see is miraculous. They just currently don't know how what they saw was possible.
Get a hold of the videos. Honestly. Why does society at large need to accept it? And what is society other than people? Some people believe, as they've witnessed miracles; most, like yourself, aren't willing to find out if it's *really* true. Tell me something, honestly, k? If you were to see these miracles - and there is simply no other explanation - would you then re-think your position, or would you still refuse to believe?No, it's not fact. There have been no documented cases of miracles that have been openly accepted by society, only christians. Just because your perception of an event is miraculous (like someone being revived from near death), doesn't mean there isn't a reasonable explanation for it.
But who says? And what about the thousands of people that do kill, steal and rape? For them, it's common sense, and they don't see it as wrong. In fact, they feel pretty good about it. But it's evil, right? And it's evil regardless of whether we think so or not. So for the people who see it's evil, what tells them that?No, I am saying that it makes sense for everyone not to freely kill people because that would threaten our survival as a species. I have no urge to kill, steal, rape, etc, anyway, but it makes sense to me not to do these things because it would destroy society. God has nothing to do with that.
Gosh, and nor would I. I'm not sure where that came from...Theists like to play this semantic game just so they can say that atheism is a religion as well. You can't be further from the truth. Even if i admit that it is a belief, the only thing you can know for sure about this belief is that we don't believe in god. That's it. You can't say that we are immoral, hedonistic, evil, cruel, etc.
You seem to feel Christians "tar" all atheists with the same brush... why is that? It's like you're expecting an attack. That won't happen, dude. Seriously.For example, what if I all the sudden started believing in pink unicorns and I told you about this belief. You would then become an apinkunicornist. That is now your belief, that you do not believe in pink unicorns. Can I tell anything else about you from this belief other than that you don't believe in pink unicorns? No. Well that's exactly what "atheism" is. I wouldn't even be an atheist if you hadn't told me about your belief in god.
How many labels have you adopted due to newfangled beliefs?Why should I have to automatically have a belief and a label every time someone else comes up with a new off the wall belief? I am a human being and that's all. Period.
No, no, read that quote again. His belief that God was dead meant he felt he was free to commit whatever atrocities he wanted. His racism was a seed; his fundamental militant atheism is what allowed him to do it and gave him the impetus to do it.His lack of belief in god may have influenced the justification of what he did but Hitler killed more out of racism than religion. He did not kill in the name of a god. He killed out of hatred for other human beings not like himself.
Many don't want to see it. But my relationship with Jesus is based partly on faith, that He died for me, and that He loves me and that I will spend eternity with Him... and partly based on evidence, which affords me the ability to have complete and utter faith in Him, and in who He says He is.If there is so much evidence to prove god's existence, then where does all this "faith" come in? I thought the whole reason you need faith was because there was no evidence and now you're telling me there's overwhelming evidence and that atheists and non-christians around the world are just ignoring this evidence?
Both. They aren't mutually exclusive, at all.If you believe because of evidence, that's not faith, that's just being an intelligent human being. Faith comes in when there is no evidence. So which is it, do you have faith or do you believe because of the evidence?
How's that being done here?I see it working by simply not pushing your belief on others.
No, Christ never said, "spread the Gospel, unless they threaten you, then just cowardly roll over for them."Actually, it does have a bearing on what you do if they kill you or your family.
Sure we should try to stop murders. But I fail to see how that overrides Christ's command to spread the Gospel.Don't you think you should concern yourself with trying to prevent that?
Which is a byproduct of your cultural influence, and I might add is the pinnacle of the Christian faith. You see, you only will ever have, what you have to work with, and what you have to work with is what you have been influenced by, and exposed to. Thus, you may very well be intelligent, and well informed, but that is still all you have to work with, the limited data you have gathered as an individual, living in the culture you have, with it's limited confines. And Given what you have put forth, you are hopelessly influenced by the Christian faith, and it's ideals of morality. In a sense, you are following the teachings of Jesus, you just do not realize them as such, again, this is a product of your culture and it's influence upon you, molding your very thinking patterns, to have you believe what the culture as a whole believes, regardless of your acceptance of a God or gods.
In the 1850's, many people still didn't see black slaves as people either.I personally don't see fetuses as humans until they reach a certain development stage. That stage for me is when they can live independently of their mother. If the fetus is a human, they would be able to live independently of their mother as (most of) us humans do. Just my 2 cents.
This is a strawman. We have as much evidence as you do about your own beliefs, now you may say that Atheism is not a belief, but it is, is might not be a "Religion" but it is the Belief that there is no God (or gods), it is a creed, with it's own dogmas, and ideals. As such, you have as much evidence as everyone else to your claim or belief, yet you hold to it.. the question is.. why?
We think, see, the Scriptures establish what is Moral and Immoral, with out them, anyone could say something is immoral or moral and do it, and say that are living a moral life.
What is the basis of your morality? Your law/civil law/???? If your morality is based on your own opinions, then of course you are moral. I was also until I discovered how horribly mistaken I was.How fair is this? The fact that I'm moral is due all to christianity's influence on me? But if I were evil, it would be because of the devil or because I don't accept god?
That's pretty cheap of christianity to take credit for all that is good and pawn off all that's bad on everything else.
In the 1850's, many people still didn't see black slaves as people either.
The Bible clearly indicates that a fetus is a living being which is known by God. Your opinion is just that; God's opinion is something different.What exactly is a human being? A living organism capable of A, B, C, D, etc? Well if a fetus does not meet this criteria, then it's not a human being.
The only difference between blacks and whites was skin color and other visual differences. Their point wasn't valid.
What is the basis of your morality? Your law/civil law/???? If your morality is based on your own opinions, then of course you are moral. I was also until I discovered how horribly mistaken I was.
You all cannot use the bible as evidence. You do understand that your religion is based on faith, right? Faith that the bible is correct and that other holy books are not, right?The Bible clearly indicates that a fetus is a living being which is known by God. Your opinion is just that; God's opinion is something different.
Get a hold of the videos. Honestly. Why does society at large need to accept it? And what is society other than people? Some people believe, as they've witnessed miracles; most, like yourself, aren't willing to find out if it's *really* true. Tell me something, honestly, k? If you were to see these miracles - and there is simply no other explanation - would you then re-think your position, or would you still refuse to believe?
So anyone not self-sustaining is not human?What exactly is a human being? A living organism capable of A, B, C, D, etc? Well if a fetus does not meet this criteria, then it's not a human being.
You cannot prove that I did not put myself together. Therefore, I believe that god had nothing to do with it.Human DNA, and being put together by God.
Your hair does not grow into a baby, which grows into a child, which grows into a youth, which grows into an old man. A fetus does. "Fetus" is Latin for "offspring" for a reason.You cannot prove that I did not put myself together. Therefore, I believe that god had nothing to do with it.
Silly reasoning isn't it? just because I can't prove that god didn't make humans doesn't mean that god actually made us.
So yeah, me putting myself together is no more valid than god putting me together.
But you're right, the DNA is there, but my hair has my DNA as well, if I pluck it out, does that mean I just killed myself or another human being? Not hardly.
Your hair does not grow into a baby, which grows into a child, which grows into a youth, which grows into an old man. A fetus does. "Fetus" is Latin for "offspring" for a reason.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?