• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Theistic Evolution?

NOTurTypical

Out of the Closet Jesus Freak
Jun 29, 2011
381
11
Indianapolis
Visit site
✟23,088.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Libertarian

Are you pretending you can't follow the flow of the conversation that began with the OP?

The theory of Evolution isn't limited to animals, it includes humans as well who before had a common ancestor that was not a human (homo sapiens).

Literal Biblical interpretation leaves no room for the theory of Evolution, it has death before the fall.
 
Upvote 0

Assyrian

Basically pulling an Obama (Thanks Calminian!)
Mar 31, 2006
14,868
991
Wales
✟42,286.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Are you pretending you can't follow the flow of the conversation that began with the OP?
No I am trying to get you to join the dots and come up with a clear argument I can address :)

The theory of Evolution isn't limited to animals, it includes humans as well who before had a common ancestor that was not a human (homo sapiens).
Indeed.

Literal Biblical interpretation leaves no room for the theory of Evolution, it has death before the fall.
But why is animal death before the fall a problem? Does Genesis say the animals were created immortal? Does the bible say anywhere that animal death was the result of the fall?

Does the bible even say Adam was immortal? Couldn't Adam have been mortal but placed in a garden with the tree of life so he could live forever by eating from it? If you still think Adam had to be immortal, though the bible doesn't say this, couldn't God have created Adam using evolution, but given him immortality?

What kind of death came with the fall anyway? Adam was told he would surely die the day he ate the fruit. Did he die physically the day he ate it, or was it spiritual death, his relationship with God broken by his sin? Does the bible say anywhere that it is physical death that is the result of the fall rather than spiritual death?

Your problem here is not so much literal interpretation, but all the extra traditions literalists add in that the bible doesn't say.

But welcome to the forum NOTurTypical :)
 
Upvote 0

NOTurTypical

Out of the Closet Jesus Freak
Jun 29, 2011
381
11
Indianapolis
Visit site
✟23,088.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Libertarian
Your problem here is not so much literal interpretation, but all the extra traditions literalists add in that the bible doesn't say.


Really now?! The Bible in Exodus 20:11 says God created the Earth and all that was in it in 6 days. The problem with an old Earth hypothesis is not Genesis, it's Exodus. When God wrote it with His own finger in stone on Mt. Sinai.

Six days.

And the Bible declares that "the wages for sin is death". So how can you have death before the fall? The Holy Spirit also says in Romans 5:12 that death entered the world because of the sin of Adam:

"Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:"

Animals do not sin, sin never entered the world until Eve and through Adam it passes to all men. Likewise, there was no curse on creation before the fall.

Sorry, that's not "extra traditions", that's a literal reading of the Biblical text. Especially Exodus chapter 20:11.

:thumbsup:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

NOTurTypical

Out of the Closet Jesus Freak
Jun 29, 2011
381
11
Indianapolis
Visit site
✟23,088.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Libertarian
What kind of death came with the fall anyway? Adam was told he would surely die the day he ate the fruit. Did he die physically the day he ate it,..

Who's "wristwatch" was keeping time? God's or Adam's? Seems to me a thousand years as is one day and a day is as a thousand years to the Lord. I don't think the Holy Spirit includes these literary devices to flavor, I believe every jot and tittle is inspired, everything is there by deliberate design.

Adam lived to be 930, he died in 1 day as far as God was concerned.
 
Upvote 0

Assyrian

Basically pulling an Obama (Thanks Calminian!)
Mar 31, 2006
14,868
991
Wales
✟42,286.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Your problem here is not so much literal interpretation, but all the extra traditions literalists add in that the bible doesn't say.
Really now?! The Bible in Exodus 20:11 says God created the Earth and all that was in it in 6 days. The problem with an old Earth hypothesis is not Genesis, it's Exodus. When God wrote it with His own finger in stone on Mt. Sinai.

Six days.
We could look at the way Moses interpreted the days in Genesis as a lesson teaching Sabbath observance, but remember, we were talking about death before the fall. That is what I was referring to when I spoke of "Your problem here ..."

And the Bible declares that "the wages for sin is death".
So why do animals die then since they cannot sin and do nothing to earn the wages of death? Were the Ephesians physically dead before they became Christians? You were dead in your transgressions and sins Eph 2:1 NET. Paul said he died when he first sinned Rom 7:9 And I was once alive apart from the law, but with the coming of the commandment sin became alive 10 and I died. Sounds like the wages of sin here too. Paul sinned and he died. But he was still alive physically years later when he wrote the letter.

So how can you have death before the fall? The Holy Spirit also says in Romans 5:12 that death entered the world because of the sin of Adam:

"Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:"

Animals do not sin, sin never entered the world until Eve and through Adam it passes to all men. Likewise, there was no curse on creation before the fall.
If animals cannot sin you have the same problem here as you have with the wage of sin verse. First look at who this death spread to.

Rom 5:12 ESV Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned. Paul is talking about death spreading to all men because of sin, not animals, all men. So why do animals die? The bible doesn't say their death was the result of the fall, so there is no reason to think they didn't die before the fall. Then have a look at why death spread to all men and so death spread to all men because all sinned. If this death Paul is talking about spread to all men because they sinned, how was it able to spread to animals who don't sin?

Sorry, that's not "extra traditions", that's a literal reading of the Biblical text.
I pointed you to a list of these traditions in my last post.
That animals were created immortal.
Animal death was the result of the fall.
Adam was created immortal.
That it is physical death that came the fall even though in the story Adam quite clearly didn't did physically the day he died.

Especially Exodus chapter 20:11.
:thumbsup:
Have a read of the other list of the ten commandments in Deuteronomy 5, and look at the Sabbath command. Here te illustration of the Sabbath command is not the days of creation, but the Exodus from Egypt

Deut 5:12 "'Observe the Sabbath day, to keep it holy, as the LORD your God commanded you.
13 Six days you shall labor and do all your work,
14 but the seventh day is a Sabbath to the LORD your God. On it you shall not do any work, you or your son or your daughter or your male servant or your female servant, or your ox or your donkey or any of your livestock, or the sojourner who is within your gates, that your male servant and your female servant may rest as well as you.
15 You shall remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt, and the LORD your God brought you out from there with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm. Therefore the LORD your God commanded you to keep the Sabbath day.


The question is, is this a literal description of the Exodus or is the Lord's 'mighty hand and outstretched arm' a metaphorical description of God freeing them from Egypt? And if Moses can us a metaphorical description of the Exodus to illustrate the Sabbath command, couldn't he also use a metaphorical description of the creation?

Who's "wristwatch" was keeping time? God's or Adam's? Seems to me a thousand years as is one day and a day is as a thousand years to the Lord. I don't think the Holy Spirit includes these literary devices to flavor, I believe every jot and tittle is inspired, everything is there by deliberate design.

Adam lived to be 930, he died in 1 day as far as God was concerned.
So you don't interpret the days in Genesis literally? :) I love Genesis 2:17, because literalists either have to interpret death spiritually or have a non literal interpretation of 'day'.
 
Upvote 0

kmdickinson

Newbie
Jul 8, 2011
54
6
✟22,708.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ok, when you read the Genesis account, Plant life was created on the 3rd day and the sun on the 4th day. If "Day" here means anything longer than 24 hours, how would plant life sustain for millions of years before the Sun is created?

This is a matter belief. Either you trust 100% of God's word or you don't. If you can't trust the Genesis account of Creation then why trust God's plan for salvation through Jesus Christ. Theistic evolution is a tare the enemy has sown in the wheat field.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Gozreht
Upvote 0
P

Paul 5

Guest
I have come to think that possibly life on this planet has not been here very long,the great time periods are created by believing that fossils are the result of creatures dying in neat layers over great periods of time,I see that idea as going against what we know of our present earth and just plain common sense. We know today that when a creature dies then the body will disappear in days,there is no lying there waiting to be fossilized. So a fossil would have to be a freak accident, possibly when an earthquake occurs and a bank of earth suddenly falls trapping and preserving all the creatures under it.This would produce a column of fossils according to where they were when the bank of earth fall on them and would be like what today is called the geological column.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NOTurTypical
Upvote 0

Gozreht

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2011
723
25
USA
Visit site
✟1,114.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
(changed my mind, I will post more :wave:)

Paul,

Do you mean freak things like mud slides during a huge...i don't know...flood?!! Good point. Bodies in the sun, decay. We are biodegradable. Add a little water and wind and no one would know we were here after one year.


KM,
Good point. How could plants live without photosynthesis? But the Bible does say there was light before the sun.


Assyrian,
The earth did not sin either but Genesis 3:17 says the ground was cursed because of Adam. Death, in all ways, entered the world. And because death entered, there had to be a way back to life both ways; babies for physical and Jesus for spiritual (even in the OT). The serpent was now cursed MORE than all the other animals which implies that all were cursed or it would have said, "serpent you are cursed" only. If man was the only one that was cursed due to sin, then why did God destroy animals in the flood 1600 years later? He could have just wiped out man, but they were under our curse as well.

If you read the whole book of Ephesians and see the reasons for the writings, then the dilemma you posed would not hold water. They were dead IN SIN, spiritual, as all men are without Jesus. Death, everyone knows will happen physical. It was just a wake up call by Paul to not die the second death. There should be no spin put to it.
 
Upvote 0
D

dies-l

Guest
This is a matter belief. Either you trust 100% of God's word or you don't. If you can't trust the Genesis account of Creation then why trust God's plan for salvation through Jesus Christ. Theistic evolution is a tare the enemy has sown in the wheat field.

It is precisely this kind of rhetoric that has made me tire of even attempting to have a civilized conversation on the topic.

Once again, I do trust God's word 100% AND I accept the possibility of Theistic Evolution. I trust the Genesis account 100%, but I don't agree with YOUR (literal/historical) interpretation of it. This is not a matter of whether one is "trusting" Scripture. It is a matter of how one is interpreting it.
 
Upvote 0

NOTurTypical

Out of the Closet Jesus Freak
Jun 29, 2011
381
11
Indianapolis
Visit site
✟23,088.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Libertarian
It is precisely this kind of rhetoric that has made me tire of even attempting to have a civilized conversation on the topic.

Once again, I do trust God's word 100% AND I accept the possibility of Theistic Evolution. I trust the Genesis account 100%, but I don't agree with YOUR (literal/historical) interpretation of it. This is not a matter of whether one is "trusting" Scripture. It is a matter of how one is interpreting it.


And as said, the problem with not accepting the Genesis account isn't that book, it's Exodus 20:11.
 
Upvote 0

kmdickinson

Newbie
Jul 8, 2011
54
6
✟22,708.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It is precisely this kind of rhetoric that has made me tire of even attempting to have a civilized conversation on the topic.

Once again, I do trust God's word 100% AND I accept the possibility of Theistic Evolution. I trust the Genesis account 100%, but I don't agree with YOUR (literal/historical) interpretation of it. This is not a matter of whether one is "trusting" Scripture. It is a matter of how one is interpreting it.

Ok, in Joshua, the Earth was made still in it's rotation. Do you believe this supernatural event could happen by the work of God? It defies all natural logic in that the mountains would fly off into orbit and the tidal waves would created would nearly if not completely destroy the planet among a whole host of other disasters. Then, the rotation would have to be started again. But the Bible says it happened. Do you believe this?

Many were raised from the dead by Jesus and the Apostles. Are these Supernatural events possible? It defies all medical logic that after several days Lazarus could come forth from the grave. The Bible says it happened. Do you believe this?

The Bible says the Hebrews crossed the Red Sea on dry land with a wall of water on either side of them. This supernatural event defies hydrodynamics in every way possible. The Bible says it happened. Do you believe this?

My point is, if God can do these things (and I'm assuming you believe them since you said you trust the Bible 100%) then why could he not create Time, Space, Matter, and life in 6 literal days?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Assyrian

Basically pulling an Obama (Thanks Calminian!)
Mar 31, 2006
14,868
991
Wales
✟42,286.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Assyrian,
The earth did not sin either but Genesis 3:17 says the ground was cursed because of Adam.
Not sure the ground suffered though. Cursing the ground Adam was going to farm was a punishment for Adam. What you need to show from scripture is that animal death is a result of the fall, but the bible doesn't say that anywhere.

Death, in all ways, entered the world.
It is always tempting to read more into scripture than it is actually saying, thinking by readin as much as possible into the text we are taking it as seriously as possible. But the bible frequently talks of people who sin being 'dead' "you were dead in your trespasses and sin", but Paul wasn't writing to zombies. When we read about death in scripture we need to try to understand what kind of death it is talking about, whether it is physical or spiritual or indeed both. But you can't simply assume it refers to both.

And because death entered, there had to be a way back to life both ways; babies for physical and Jesus for spiritual (even in the OT).
I think we need to differentiate between our theology, how everything we understand from scripture fits together in our minds, and what the bible actually says.

The serpent was now cursed MORE than all the other animals which implies that all were cursed or it would have said, "serpent you are cursed" only.
Or it could means that of all the animals God cursed the serpent. We find construction in Gen 6:19 And of every living thing of all flesh, you shall bring two of every sort into the ark to keep them alive with you. They shall be male and female. It doesn't mean the pairs of animals were brought on the ark more than the ones left outside. Interesting take on the verse though :)

If man was the only one that was cursed due to sin, then why did God destroy animals in the flood 1600 years later? He could have just wiped out man, but they were under our curse as well.
God could have created animal mortal and still wiped them out in the flood.

If you read the whole book of Ephesians and see the reasons for the writings, then the dilemma you posed would not hold water. They were dead IN SIN, spiritual, as all men are without Jesus. Death, everyone knows will happen physical. It was just a wake up call by Paul to not die the second death. There should be no spin put to it.
I don't think you are getting to the heart of the problem, if death comes through sin, how can animal die? However if the wages of sin Paul talks about is spiritual death and the death that "spread to all men because all sinned" is spiritual death, then Paul isn't talking about animal here and animal death has nothing to do with the fall.
 
Upvote 0
D

dies-l

Guest
Ok, in Joshua, the Earth was made still in it's rotation. Do you believe this supernatural event could happen by the work of God? It defies all natural logic in that the mountains would fly off into orbit and the tidal waves would created would nearly if not completely destroy the planet among a whole host of other disasters. Then, the rotation would have to be started again. But the Bible says it happened. Do you believe this?

Where in Joshua does it say that? The closest I can find is Joshua 10:12-13, which says that the sun and the moon stopped. It is a giant leap in logic to attribute this to the Earth stopping. Having not seriously studied the passage, I will pass on speculating how best to interpret that passage. But, I certainly accept that "with God all things are possible."

Many were raised from the dead by Jesus and the Apostles. Are these Supernatural events possible? It defies all medical logic that after several days Lazarus could come forth from the grave. The Bible says it happened. Do you believe this?

YES!

The Bible says the Hebrews crossed the Red Sea on dry land with a wall of water on either side of them. This supernatural event defies hydrodynamics in every way possible. The Bible says it happened. Do you believe this?

YES, I believe that the Hebrews crossed either the Red Sea or the Sea of Reeds on dry land. There is a translation issue that raises legitimate questions as to which it was, but it is nonetheless miraculous that the same body of water that parted for the Hebrews drowned the Egyptians.


My point is, if God can do these things (and I'm assuming you believe them since you said you trust the Bible 100%) then why could he not create Time, Space, Matter, and life in 6 literal days?

He could have done that. I don't posit otherwise. But, I don't believe that He did, and I don't believe that a proper interpretation of Scripture would cause someone to think that He did. It's not a matter of whether He could have; it is a matter of whether he did do. All things are possible with God. That doesn't mean that He has actually done all things.
 
Upvote 0

NOTurTypical

Out of the Closet Jesus Freak
Jun 29, 2011
381
11
Indianapolis
Visit site
✟23,088.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Libertarian
Exodus 20:11 creates no unique problems for an allegorical interpretation of Genesis 1.

What is your basis for allegorizing "day" Genesis 1? Of the other 5,000+ times "day" is used it's for a literal 24 hour day. So what is the basis for allegorizing Genesis 1?
 
Upvote 0
D

dies-l

Guest
What is your basis for allegorizing "day" Genesis 1? Of the other 5,000+ times "day" is used it's for a literal 24 hour day. So what is the basis for allegorizing Genesis 1?

I am not "allegorizing 'day'". I am looking at the context of the creation poem and concluding that the poem is an allegorical poem to explain the sovereignty of God over all of Creation, the goodness of Creation, and other spiritual concepts. There are a variety of factors that go into this for me, including, but not limited to: potential contradictions generated by a literal/historical interpretation of Gen 1-11, the literary style of these passages, the sharp shift in literary style from Genesis 11 to Genesis 12, the sharp shift in the presuppositions from Genesis 11 to Genesis 12 (e.g., why was Abram so convinced that 90+ year old people can't have children, when very recently in his own family tree, this had happened?), and so on. Put simply, the text does not support a literal/historical interpretation, and anyone who believes that that is the only acceptable interpretation is thereby logically forced to accept that Scripture contains errors, which is something that I will not accept.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Assyrian
Upvote 0

Assyrian

Basically pulling an Obama (Thanks Calminian!)
Mar 31, 2006
14,868
991
Wales
✟42,286.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What is your basis for allegorizing "day" Genesis 1? Of the other 5,000+ times "day" is used it's for a literal 24 hour day. So what is the basis for allegorizing Genesis 1?
Gen 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens.
 
Upvote 0

Gozreht

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2011
723
25
USA
Visit site
✟1,114.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Not sure the ground suffered though. Cursing the ground Adam was going to farm was a punishment for Adam. What you need to show from scripture is that animal death is a result of the fall, but the bible doesn't say that anywhere.

What do you call drought and trees dying? Did the tree do something? The ground was cursed. It had mist that watered it since no rain would fall until the flood. I know they are 1600 years apart but this does lead to the fact that the earth will perish with us.

It is always tempting to read more into scripture than it is actually saying, thinking by readin as much as possible into the text we are taking it as seriously as possible. But the bible frequently talks of people who sin being 'dead' "you were dead in your trespasses and sin", but Paul wasn't writing to zombies. When we read about death in scripture we need to try to understand what kind of death it is talking about, whether it is physical or spiritual or indeed both. But you can't simply assume it refers to both.
Thinking and reading is called studying. Anyway we are not disagreeing here. But the death in Genesis means both because neither one happened yet. Death when being taught by Paul is about spiritual deathbecause he was talking to people who did not understand spiritual death. They knew physical death. He didn't say, "newsflash:all bodies will cease to exist one day".

I think we need to differentiate between our theology, how everything we understand from scripture fits together in our minds, and what the bible actually says.

Yet you say:

God could have created animal mortal and still wiped them out in the flood.

And that is not proven either.

Or it could means that of all the animals God cursed the serpent. We find construction in Gen 6:19 And of every living thing of all flesh, you shall bring two of every sort into the ark to keep them alive with you. They shall be male and female. It doesn't mean the pairs of animals were brought on the ark more than the ones left outside.

But that is not ion any translation. They all say "above" or "more". That is a direct implication. Scripture does not say "more" or "above" when it talks about the Ark. It strictly says all pairs of every living animal. Nothing foggy about that.

Interesting take on the verse though :)

I try my best. Thanks.:D


I don't think you are getting to the heart of the problem, if death comes through sin, how can animal die? However if the wages of sin Paul talks about is spiritual death and the death that "spread to all men because all sinned" is spiritual death, then Paul isn't talking about animal here and animal death has nothing to do with the fall.

Okay. I do not know why it would. There are many things God does that I do not understand. I am only 5'7". Why? God could have made me 5'9", but the Bible doesn't tell why He did this. But it does say I am fearfully and wonderfully made...not developed (evolved) by the way:thumbsup:. But the whole earth which was placed in our hands lives and dies due to us. Not fair to them, but we do not know the whole reason.
 
Upvote 0

Gozreht

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2011
723
25
USA
Visit site
✟1,114.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Where in Joshua does it say that? The closest I can find is Joshua 10:12-13, which says that the sun and the moon stopped. It is a giant leap in logic to attribute this to the Earth stopping.

Not criticizing, just adding to this. The earth stopped because the sun does not revolve around us. That's the only thing it could mean. But from our perspective the sun stayed at the same angle it was at for an hour. Now, the moon stopped and that would cause the tides to roll over the coasts!
 
Upvote 0

Assyrian

Basically pulling an Obama (Thanks Calminian!)
Mar 31, 2006
14,868
991
Wales
✟42,286.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What do you call drought and trees dying?
All part of the natural world God created.

Did the tree do something? The ground was cursed. It had mist that watered it since no rain would fall until the flood. I know they are 1600 years apart but this does lead to the fact that the earth will perish with us.
Actually the bible doesn't say there was no rain until the flood. The flood account is the first mention of rain, but that doesn't mean it was the first rain ever. Genesis describe the red adamah soil Adam was formed from and to which he returned to till after Eden as being cursed, not the whole earth being cursed. And the curse was that it would produce abundant plant life for Adam, just not the kinds of plants adam wanted to grow, but thorns and thistles. There is no hint of plants suddenly becoming mortal after the fall, let alone animals. death being the result of the fall

Thinking and reading is called studying. Anyway we are not disagreeing here. But the death in Genesis means both because neither one happened yet.
That is what you are reading into the text. There certainly wasn't spiritual death because man hadn't sinned yet, but you don't know from the text that there wasn't physical death, because the text simply doesn't say that.

Death when being taught by Paul is about spiritual deathbecause he was talking to people who did not understand spiritual death. They knew physical death. He didn't say, "newsflash:all bodies will cease to exist one day".
Yes physical death has always been used to explain spiritual death, because we understand physical death we see it all around us. It is a very effective metaphor and analogy for spiritual death and corruption. Which is interesting, because Genesis seems to assume Adam understood what death meant when God warned him not to eat from the tree.

Anyway physical death wasn't just a good illustration of spiritual, Paul had to be talking about spiritual death because he was talking about people being dead who were still walking around in Ephesus.

I think we need to differentiate between our theology, how everything we understand from scripture fits together in our minds, and what the bible actually says.
Yet you say:
God could have created animal mortal and still wiped them out in the flood.
And that is not proven either.
I was simply showing you another interpretation that is consistent with the text. You thought the flood somehow showed the animals were cursed by Adam's sin, but it simply does not follow.

But that is not ion any translation. They all say "above" or "more". That is a direct implication. Scripture does not say "more" or "above" when it talks about the Ark. It strictly says all pairs of every living animal. Nothing foggy about that.
Yet the flood account used the same Hebrew construction. If the Hebrew doesn't support your interpretation, it probably means you are reading things into the English translation. If you want translations that donj't go down the road of 'more' or 'above' check out
Gen 3:14 CEV "Because of what you have done, you will be the only animal to suffer this curse... "
GNB "You will be punished for this; you alone of all the animals must bear this curse.... "
NLT "Because you have done this, you will be punished. You are singled out from all the domestic and wild animals of the whole earth to be cursed."

I try my best. Thanks.:D

Okay. I do not know why it would. There are many things God does that I do not understand. I am only 5'7". Why? God could have made me 5'9", but the Bible doesn't tell why He did this. But it does say I am fearfully and wonderfully made...not developed (evolved) by the way:thumbsup:. But the whole earth which was placed in our hands lives and dies due to us. Not fair to them, but we do not know the whole reason.
The problem is, you are puzzling about the reason God did something the bible never says he did. Nowhere in the bible does it say animal death is the result of the fall. It is not even that Paul does not describe how death spread to animals, but the way he explained that death spread couldn't effect animal anyway. Animal death from the fall is simply not a biblical teaching.
 
Upvote 0