• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The world Endorses Ron Paul

katsung47

Newbie
Mar 8, 2011
1,504
93
✟38,885.00
Faith
Atheist
unelectable-vs-electable-ron-paul-2012-peace-prosperity-politics-1330439272.jpg
 
Upvote 0

JustMeSee

Contributor
Feb 9, 2008
7,703
297
In my living room.
✟31,439.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I believe that the MSM is giving Ron Paul a raw deal. From the beginning until now, they have seemed to be deliberately under reporting him. I am not much for conspiracies, but this does seem to be a universal move across outlets.
 
Upvote 0

katsung47

Newbie
Mar 8, 2011
1,504
93
✟38,885.00
Faith
Atheist
Paul has drawn crowds, did they get lost on the way to the polls?

One thing is clear. Votes could be rigged. It depends on the vote counter. The attendence couldn't be rigged. It denpends on people's will. That's why you saw those pictures. It also explains why the media didn't report it.

It proves what I have said, "this country is a covert totalitarian. The ruling clasee select the politicians through rigged election (because they control the intelligence - the Feds) and justify the result by fake polls (because they control the media.
 
Upvote 0

katsung47

Newbie
Mar 8, 2011
1,504
93
✟38,885.00
Faith
Atheist
hq4f5e571c.jpg


Poll said Satorum won. Picture shows Ron Paul drew much more crowds. which one do you believe?

Feds controls election office. They rigged election to select any candidate who is their favorite. The rest work is left for media which issued fake poll to convince public the election was a fair one.
 
Upvote 0

katsung47

Newbie
Mar 8, 2011
1,504
93
✟38,885.00
Faith
Atheist
Upvote 0

Illuminaughty

Drift and Doubt
May 18, 2012
4,617
133
✟28,109.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
It's possible that votes are rigged but you can't overlook the possibility that Paul supporters are more motivated and excited with Paul than Romney supporters are with their man. Romney is their "not Obama" man but other than that he doesn't draw much in the way of enthusiasm. The media tells people Paul can't win so they go with Romney even though he is boring. Theystill don't have the enthusiasm to drag themselves to one of his rally's though.
 
Upvote 0

katsung47

Newbie
Mar 8, 2011
1,504
93
✟38,885.00
Faith
Atheist
Lawyers for Ron Paul - GOP fraud
free_life2 » 06/ 07/

Your Help Is Needed – We MUST ACT QUICKLY

Are you FED UP with the fraud of the GOP in this election??…Become informed of a LAWSUIT BEING FILED soon in federal court - CIVIL RIGHTS AND VOTER FRAUD VIOLATIONS.

A group of attorneys have come together –“LAWYERS FOR RON

PAUL” (https://www.facebook.com/groups/188334154612254/) and will be on a huge conference call on Wednesday 06/06/2012 @ 7:00 pm (PST) / 10:00 pm (EST), to explain this “Heart-Pounding” event.

http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=308&t=155576
 
Upvote 0

Maren

Veteran
Oct 20, 2007
8,709
1,659
✟72,368.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
One thing is clear. Votes could be rigged. It depends on the vote counter. The attendence couldn't be rigged. It denpends on people's will. That's why you saw those pictures. It also explains why the media didn't report it.

It proves what I have said, "this country is a covert totalitarian. The ruling clasee select the politicians through rigged election (because they control the intelligence - the Feds) and justify the result by fake polls (because they control the media.

Actually, you aren't quite right. Attendance can be rigged as well. For example, in some locations (such as Idaho and North Dakota), Ron Paul was speaking at the party caucus -- people showed up for the caucus and not necessarily for Ron Paul. Second, sometimes you have large crowds because you have the same people attend multiple rallies (for example, rather than 2000 at 5 rallies being 10000 different people it is actually only 4000, with about 1600 who attend all the rallies). And, such as with the pictures you show, it is easy to cherry pick (especially when the major candidates held hundreds of rallies) to find the best and worst attended rally of each candidate to stack the "results".

As for voting being rigged, I see one major problem that tells me that they weren't rigged. That is that in most cases the final vote looked very similar to the exit polls that were released (in almost every case within the margin of error).

Last, the ironic part about the examples of fraud mentioned earlier in the thread (Missouri and Georgia), neither of those favored Romney. Instead, it was GOP leaders who wanted Santorum delegates in Missouri, and in Georgia is was Gingrich who was to be the beneficiary.
 
Upvote 0

Maren

Veteran
Oct 20, 2007
8,709
1,659
✟72,368.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
A better question first: if Paul is so popular, why did he not receive the votes?

Especially noting that the elections you claim there is evidence of fraud, the fraud wasn't in Romney's benefit -- in Georgia it was allegedly to aid Gingrich and in Missouri it was to aid Santorum. Even Iowa, where some want to claim there were irregularities to aid Romney, Romney didn't win and Paul (in terms of delegates, though not votes at the caucus) seems to have won.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

katsung47

Newbie
Mar 8, 2011
1,504
93
✟38,885.00
Faith
Atheist
Fraud confirmed in Texas. Election judge says votes were switched.

Submitted by Dr.K.Research on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 13:29
in Daily Paul Liberty Forum

Could Ron Paul have gotten 72% of the vote instead of 12%? Anne Beckett, election judge for Austin (Travis County), says it is so.

In fact, she did an entrance poll of Republican voters for their party preference and says that a minimum of 66% offered on their own that they came to vote for Ron Paul. As she polled them she wrote a line on her hand, then, counted the total voters. A minimum of 66% and as high as 72% of all the votes went for Paul, NOT Romney (she wishes to be conservative, but says that at the bare minimum 66%, not 12%, of the votes went to Paul).

For credibility it is important to note that she took a complete poll and was there from 6:00 a.m. until closing (12 hours). The precinct she judged was 247-R.

Updated with Action Plan: Fraud confirmed in Texas. Election judge says votes were switched. | Peace . Gold . Liberty | Revolution
 
Upvote 0

katsung47

Newbie
Mar 8, 2011
1,504
93
✟38,885.00
Faith
Atheist
A better question first: if Paul is so popular, why did he not receive the votes?

.

Because the votes for Paul were transfered to Romney.

Hundreds of thousands of Ron Paul supporters voted for Romney today

Submitted by Dr.K.Research on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 19:00 in
Daily Paul Liberty Forum

Hundreds of enthusiastic DP’ers have posted proudly, “I voted for Ron Paul today.” However, in many cases that's not even true. Instead, those dedicated freedom fighters may have just cast their votes for their arch-enemy, globalist and Goldman Sachs candidate Mitt Romney. Even more bizarre, those votes may well have went to Santorum and even Gingrich, too. How else could anyone explain those numbers.

[FONT='Times New Roman','serif']When Michelle Bachmann dropped out of the race, how did she do in her own home state? She got less than .5% of ther vote. Santorum with 12% in West Virginia, defeating the actively campaigning Paul? That is impossible.

.....

UPDATE: This started from the beginning. In Iowa Edward L. True caught the error, filed an affidavit, and made the riggers change it. In a neighboring county, Appanoose-Union, a township with only 100 potential voters, Santorum was give 32 caucus votes. The GOP was called on it by Iowa activists. They changed it to 3 votes. Matt McDonald caught Maine GOP fudging numbers, stealing votes from Dr. Paul, and forced them to change it. And we're supposed to be the paranoid ones? If we ARE suspicious, we have been given all the reason to be.

You want more proof of the rigging? Go here:

Photos - Harrisburg Liberty Alliance (Harrisburg, PA) - Meetup... (West Virginia)

WV Vote Flipping Caught on Tape - YouTube (West Virginia
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0