Texas Lynn
Well-Known Member
- Dec 17, 2002
- 10,352
- 665
- 48
- Faith
- Methodist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Democrat
The United States does not have a military - the military has the United States.
EXAMPLE 1 - SUPPLIES
Both the Vietnam Era and the Occupation of Iraq became protracted conflicts lacking attainable goals.
Any government primarily concerned about the reputation of the country or the reputation of the military would pick attainable goals, attain them, and leave.
But the road map was a detailed plan for taking out the defenses, seizing airports and roads, getting in to cities, and then the plans stopped.
Why? Haliburton is supplying the soldiers and getting a lot of money for doing it. The more soldiers posted to Iraq or Afghanistan and the longer they are there, the more money Haliburton and their stooge Dick Cheney get.
Suppose you were paid 40,000 dollars each week you allowed soldiers to stay somewhere, would you care if you slowly became unpopular? The American public has been amazingly slow to catch on.
The military industrial / Cheney etc. power block has more influence over the war than the public or the military leaders themselves have.
Valid points, but to clarify the first line there, that'd be the "military-industrial complex" President Eisenhower warned us of in his farewell address and would certainly not involve per se any military members ranked below Major or Lieutenant Commander in the Navy. Part of the success of the contracting companies is the revolving door in which their executives come from retired senior officers in whose interest keeping the system intact remains.
Upvote
0