Speedwell
Well-Known Member
- May 11, 2016
- 23,928
- 17,625
- 81
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Other Religion
- Marital Status
- Married
Because God already has plenty of names. It was a joke, son.Why is the addition of "Designer" to one of many of God's names gratuitous? If God does exist, and He created all things, by definition He is the Designer. So why is this gratuitous?
The OP was implying that when one concludes design versus random chance that the design position (God) is one from ignorance. I was arguing the opposite by using a word to describe the positive nature of God as being discussed with reference to things around us, thus entirely appropriate to use the word Designer.
Yes, the rock tied to a stick is evidently man-made and I would be justified in inferring a designer. In the case of the plain rock, I would not necessarily be able to infer design, but the purpose (whether you put "re" in front of it or not) the design is still real, it is just not detectable. With regard to your watch, functional complexity is not, by itself, a sufficient basis to infer design. Unless, of course, you want to argue that everything is designed, infused with telos by divine agency whether man-made or naturally occurring, but that is really not ID any more.There is quite a difference between a rock and a watch. A watch has been purposefully designed and assembled in complexity. A rock used as a hammer has been repurposed rather than designed. Had you taken that rock and tied a stick to it to create a hammer, then that would appear as evidently designed hammer, rather than a repurpose of an existing material.
Upvote
0