Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If they were allowed to do it, they wouldn’t have been suspended my dude.Once again capitol police in authority removed barricades and capitol police in authority gave escorts inside the building just as the capitol police chief stated, yes tgey were allowed to enter and remain in the building by the capitol police in authority
We're in the realm of redundancy at this point
It sounds like a lot of folks were given the authority to do so by the police.18 USC 1752(a)(1)
(a)Whoever—
(1)
knowingly enters or remains in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do so;
(b)The punishment for a violation of subsection (a) is—
(2)
a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, in any other case.
(Fines
Section 3571 (b)Fines for Individuals.—Except as provided in subsection (e) of this section, an individual who has been found guilty of an offense may be fined not more than the greatest of—
(5)
for a Class A misdemeanor that does not result in death, not more than $100,000;
The largest sentence was 1/3rd of the maximum (120 days out of 365).
The largest fine was a few thousand dollars out of a maximum of $100,000
Some of the larger fines were imposed at the request of the DOJ because the defendants were raising money on their crimes. The $525 "base" level is a $500 restitution to the Architect of the Capitol for repairs and cleanup and a $25 "court fee".
"False claim" as documented by the capitol police chiefs statement, and Tucker Carlson capitol video surveillance reporting on the Jan 6th capitol building event below
Tucker Carlson, Jan 6th Released Video Footage 5:38 Telling A Different Story
Tucker has been caught lying, multiple times. All he wants to do is cause chaos and hate . Why would anyone , especially religious people listen to him?The Tucker Carlson link has been added to the OP, I forgot the link in posting
The capitol police was the authority at the capitol building on Jan 6th, the capitol police removed barricades allowing attendees into the building, capitol police gave escorts in the buildingIf they were allowed to do it, they wouldn’t have been suspended my dude.
Oh Sure!Tucker has been caught lying, multiple times. All he wants to do is cause chaos and hate . Why would anyone , especially religious people listen to him?
NPR
Capitol Police Suspends 6 Officers, Investigates Dozens More After Capitol Riots
February 19, 2021
They did not have the authority to let people enter any more than your local police have the authority to let the public enter your home.The capitol police was the authority at the capitol building on Jan 6th,
Which was outside of their authority.the capitol police removed barricades allowing attendees into the building, capitol police gave escorts in the building
Which wasn’t part of their authority or job. And Tucker Carlson is a known liar who admits to doing so in order to drum up ignorant people and make a buck. Anybody who believes him even knowing he laughs at the audience he caters to is a fool.The capitol police on Jan 6th allowed many attendees into the building, they allowed them to stay in the building giving tours/escorts, just as the capitol police chief described and the Tucker Carlson video clip showed
My opinion is “silenced?” What does that even mean? As far as I’m concerned, I see a guy regurgitating propaganda and when confronted with people who won’t fall for it, the best comeback he has is “be quiet.”Many of the attendees were allowed to enter the building and given escourt in the building just as the capitol police chief explains below, your opinion is "Silenced"
NPR
Capitol Police Suspends 6 Officers, Investigates Dozens More After Capitol Riots
February 19, 2021
"The investigation into the January 6 attack remains under investigation. Our Office of Professional Responsibility is investigating the actions of 35 police officers from that day. We currently have suspended six of those officers with pay," the department said in a statement.
Capitol Police Acting Chief Yogananda Pittman further directed that any member whose behavior is not in keeping with the department's Rules of Conduct "will face appropriate discipline."
The department "has been actively reviewing video and other open source materials of some USCP officers and officials that appear to be in violation of Department regulations and policies," she said on Jan. 11.
Videos from the day of the attack appear to show some officers escorting rioters inside the building. In one video, USCP officers can be seen opening barricades allowing the mob to enter the Capitol complex without resistance.
I watched the whole January 6th thing when it was happening. To be honest I really didn't think much of it. (Maybe I'd been jaded by all the other riots during that time.) I certainly wasn't concerned that it was some sort of "insurrection" or serious uprising against the government. Just another demonstration getting a bit out of hand. I thought at least their taking the protest directly to those who could do something about it and not just terrorizing innocent shop owners. I know some people saw it as a real attempt to over throw the government, if so it was a very feeble attempt.
The Jan 6th event for 2 years has been described as a (Riot) in the MSM and every communication I've seen, it's only been in the past 1 year or so that the MSM has changed the narrative from (Riot) to the word (Insurrection) a political move, let's get Donald Trump with Jack Smith as prosecutorI had to look it up before posting to 7t7:
"noun
The act or an instance of open revolt against civil authority or a constituted government."
Most violent protests in America could be considered an insurrection where police are attacked in a city or state, by definition. The constituted government is how I determine whether these violent rioters wanted to overthrow our government or take over our government. The capitol police's actions are what give me a different view of insurrection.
To you guys in a tribe, the word "insurrection" is important. I'll just wait and let the laws prevail. Your right-wing arguments in this thread confuse me because you are fighting for rioters who have pleaded guilty.The Jan 6th event for 2 years has been described as a (Riot) in the MSM and every communication I've seen, it's only been in the past 1 year or so that the MSM has changed the narrative from (Riot) to the word (Insurrection) a political move, let's get Donald Trump with Jack Smith as prosecutor
You are using the 'two wrongs make a right' defense. If police were giving 'escorts' as you say, then those police should also be punished. However there is no path to innocence for those who walked through broken windows or entered doors by those who broke windows then unlocked doors.these Americans were allowed entrance and given escorts by the capitol police, they weren't "Rioters" as you falsely claim, and some were jailed up to 6 months and fined up to $10,000?
You said that already, and it still is irrelevant. Also, there is no need to keep posting the same links to Tuck. It makes it look like you are somehow promoting him here. He is a disgraced man and proven liar.I'm fighting for peaceful and patriotic Americans that were denied capitol video surveillance from federal prosecutors and the Jan 6th committee "that proved their innocence", these Americans were allowed entrance and given escorts by the capitol police, they weren't "Rioters" as you falsely claim, and some were jailed up to 6 months and fined up to $10,000?
Then fight for the ones who claimed themselves innocent not the ones who have said they were guilty. You are projecting your presumptions onto each of these cases in which all these defendants had legal counsel. Hans gave you the law. As I've always been told "Ignorance of the law is no excuse"I'm fighting for peaceful and patriotic Americans that were denied capitol video surveillance from federal prosecutors and the Jan 6th committee "that proved their innocence", these Americans were allowed entrance and given escorts by the capitol police, they weren't "Rioters" as you falsely claim, and some were jailed up to 6 months and fined up to $10,000?
These people were not let in.At 2:40 seconds your Tucker video shows breaking and entering. A guy was peppered sprayed some more followed and opened the front door.
My argument isn't changing, the federal prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence from lawyers prior to sentencing "Unlawful"Then fight for the ones who claimed themselves innocent not the ones who have said they were guilty. You are projecting your presumptions onto each of these cases in which all these defendants had legal counsel. Hans gave you the law. As I've always been told "Ignorance of the law is no excuse"
These people were not let in.
And neither are your words. You keep repeating the same sentences over and over and over.My argument isn't changing,
I'm fighting for peaceful and patriotic Americans that were denied capitol video surveillance from federal prosecutors and the Jan 6th committee "that proved their innocence", these Americans were allowed entrance and given escorts by the capitol police, they weren't "Rioters" as is falsely claimed, and some were jailed up to 6 months and fined up to $10,000?
Tucker Carlson, Jan 6th Released Video Footage 5:38 Telling A Different Story
Not all those in the capitol building chanted such, it's your opinion and assumptionNothing screams patriotism or peacefulness louder than calling for the death of the Vice President and Speaker of the House.
The Jan 6th event for 2 years has been described as a (Riot) in the MSM and every communication I've seen, it's only been in the past 1 year or so that the MSM has changed the narrative from (Riot) to the word (Insurrection) a political move, let's get Donald Trump with Jack Smith as prosecutor
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?