Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
2.) TX is a unique case because they’re trying to do it off-cycle in an “emergency “ session. They already did their 2020 redistricting and now they’re trying to do another one.
Agreed. Illinois has the 2nd worst Gerrymandered district in the US. Texas has three of the worst.That should apply to every state, not just the ones that would benefit Democrats. Hello Illinois!
That's not true. Gerrymandering can effect any election. With the population of Texas booming, legislatures are constantly looking at retaining control through redistricting.Texas isn't "purple". You try to blame gerrymandering, but gerrymandering doesn't affect statewide races,
1.) Of the movements to push for fairness in redistricting, the only ones I’ve heard of are coming from (and happening within) left-leaning states. I haven’t heard so much as a whiff of genuine anti-gerrymandering sentiment come from the Right. The only times I’ve heard the Right complaint about gerrymandering are to point out Dems’ hypocrisy.
Congress House members---25 Republican, 12 Democrat (68% Republican)
Texas State House: 88 Republicans, 62 Democrats (59% Republican)
Texas State Senate: 19 Republicans, 12 Democrats (61% Republican)
Here's the shocker: Party affiliation among Texas registered voters
Party Registration Statistics
It seems as if Texas is already far more gerrymandered than fairness, common sense, or the wishes of the Founding Fathers would dictate. This purple state should be redistricted to bring fairness and equal representation to the voting process.
- Total Registered Voters: 17,323,617
- Democrats: 8,054,976 (46.50%)
- Republicans: 6,574,201 (37.95%)
- Third Party/Other: 0 (0.00%)
- Unaffiliated: 2,694,440 (15.55%)
There exist a variety of efforts around the country to eliminate, or at least reduce, the amount of partisanship that gets factored into the redistricting process. Usually, this means changing the makeup of the entities who draw and authorize the maps - for example, taking the authority from the majority party in the state legislature and handing it to something like a bipartisan or independent redistricting commission.Can you clarify specifically what "movements to push for fairness in redistricting" you are referring to?
There exist a variety of efforts around the country to eliminate, or at least reduce, the amount of partisanship that gets factored into the redistricting process. Usually, this means changing the makeup of the entities who draw and authorize the maps - for example, taking the authority from the majority party in the state legislature and handing it to something like a bipartisan or independent redistricting commission.
Eric Holder has been working on this for a while, but there are plenty of other groups:
Home - National Democratic Redistricting Committee
NDRC is building a targeted, state-by-state strategy to ensure Democrats can fight back against gerrymandering and achieve fair maps during the redistricting process.democraticredistricting.com
I also remember some efforts to apply standards to the characteristics of the districts, trying to limit how convoluted the shapes were. I forget the precise terminology, but there were some mathematical ways of describing the shapes that made them more or less sensible. I don't remember if those efforts went anywhere.
If we could go back in time and do it from scratch, I like Germany's model for how they do it...
From my post in another thread:
**************************************************************
The more I've looked into it, the more I like what Germany has with their MMP system (Mixed Member Proportionality)
From my understanding (and any Germans on here, feel free to correct any misinterpretations I have)
German voters get two votes on their ballot. The first vote is for a local candidate in their district (like the US system), and the second vote is for a political party.
The final composition of their parliament must match the proportional party vote.
So half of legislature is populated by regional winners, and the other half is assigned by party leadership for the "filler seats" based on who needs to get what to make the numbers line up.
So, how that would work would be... (let's pretend the number is 700 just to keep the math easy)
350 of those seats would be populated by the regional winners, the other 350 would be assigned seats by party leadership.
Each "district" would be about 950,000 people (the states can divvy those up how they'd like, because gerrymandering would be a non-issue)
The results come in...
195 Republicans Won the local races, and 155 Democrats won local races
The party vote came in, and 53% of voters said "D", and 47% said "R"
How that would shake out for the "proportionally ensured seats"
- Democrats need: 371 total - 155 won = 216 proportional seats
- Republicans need: 329 total - 195 won = 134 proportional seats
That system not only makes gerrymandering "moot" in terms of unfair advantage, it actually make gerrymandering a liability if someone tried it.
If a party drew some wacky looking districts just to help a few specific guys get a victory, they'd actually be handing more proportional seats to the other party's leadership to assign (not elect), so there's almost an incentive to keep districts as proportional as possible, because you can strategize to beat someone in an election, there's no strategizing if the other party's leadership can pick whoever they'd like to fill a seat.
And States have the legal rights to do so. I am happy that Republicans are finally fighting back instead of trying to play the better person.Agreed. Illinois has the 2nd worst Gerrymandered district in the US. Texas has three of the worst.
When were Republicans ever "trying to play the better person" on this matter? Gerrymandering predates either of the current parties:And States have the legal rights to do so. I am happy that Republicans are finally fighting back instead of trying to play the better person.
So you then concede that what is happening in Texas is a normal thing and that the only reason democrat politicians are butt sore is because they are disadvantaged? That they are just giving a dramatic show because they cannot stomach the fact that they are on the losing end and that this is not some grave threat to our "democracy?"When were Republicans ever "trying to play the better person" on this matter? Gerrymandering predates either of the current parties:
How Gerrymandering Began in the US
The practice was happening before the country's founding.www.history.com
I already addressed all of this when responding to another member in post #20. To quote myself:So you then concede that what is happening in Texas is a normal thing and that the only reason democrat politicians are butt sore is because they are disadvantaged? That they are just giving a dramatic show because they cannot stomach the fact that they are on the losing end and that this is not some grave threat to our "democracy?"
Gerrymandering is not uncommon and both sides have been guilty of it at various times.Dems are hardly innocent on this matter.
However:
1.) Of the movements to push for fairness in redistricting, the only ones I’ve heard of are coming from (and happening within) left-leaning states. I haven’t heard so much as a whiff of genuine anti-gerrymandering sentiment come from the Right. The only times I’ve heard the Right complaint about gerrymandering are to point out Dems’ hypocrisy.
2.) TX is a unique case because they’re trying to do it off-cycle in an “emergency “ session. They already did their 2020 redistricting and now they’re trying to do another one.
Republicans have been doing this, almost since the nation wide as founded. Republicans like to split up large cities so that they can control the state, which cuts those cities out of representation.And States have the legal rights to do so. I am happy that Republicans are finally fighting back instead of trying to play the better person.
This is ten years old, but even SCOTUS recognized that politicians picking their own voters was a dicey affair. Since it was a 5-4 decision, maybe it’ll be revisited soon with the court being even further to the right of G. Khan?Can you clarify specifically what "movements to push for fairness in redistricting" you are referring to?
That's not true. Gerrymandering can effect any election. With the population of Texas booming, legislatures are constantly looking at retaining control through redistricting.
The decision you appeal to wasn't plurality, it was a majority (5-4). Well, in terms of result, it was more like 7-2. Scalia and Thomas agreed with the other two dissenters on the merits, but thought the Supreme Court didn't have jurisdiction over the case and would have dismissed it for standing. Thus while they dissented, their preferred outcome would have still functionally had the same result as the majority opinion in keeping the redistricting commission.This is ten years old, but even SCOTUS recognized that politicians picking their own voters was a dicey affair. Since it was a plurality decision, maybe it’ll be revisited soon with the court being even further to the right of G. Khan?
RIGHT...it's those dirty democrats doing it all, and not them responding to previous decade or so from republicans, it's become an arms race, GOP gerymanders so democrats do and so on.And States have the legal rights to do so. I am happy that Republicans are finally fighting back instead of trying to play the better person.
My issue is, it is not going to happen in the US -- not without some type of massive change of the political parties. To implement something like this would require a Constitutional Amendment and no Amendments are going to be passed in the US in the current divisive political environment.
And I welcome democrats to gerrymander all they want. They have already milked their states dry. They will likely get zero additional seats no matter how hard they try.Both sides do it, so why there needs to be an independant group doing the districting, to make it actually fair to everyone.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?