Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
The trouble with envisioning Covid-19 growth.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Al Touthentop" data-source="post: 74843540" data-attributes="member: 424283"><p>A severe flue is estimated at .1%, not .01%. </p><p></p><p></p><p>So you're just arguing for the sake of arguing. When Fauci testified before congress, he didn't give his estimated numbers and we can't expect Congress to understand what he means by 10x worse, that it isn't as dire as it sounds, though it would mean that something like 200-600k people would die. The statement was intended to be sensational. What he's saying to the medical community who study the numbers and know what he's saying is not the same as what he said to Congress and he didn't try and clarify. And of course that testimony went to the public the large majority of which thought the sky was falling.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Al Touthentop, post: 74843540, member: 424283"] A severe flue is estimated at .1%, not .01%. So you're just arguing for the sake of arguing. When Fauci testified before congress, he didn't give his estimated numbers and we can't expect Congress to understand what he means by 10x worse, that it isn't as dire as it sounds, though it would mean that something like 200-600k people would die. The statement was intended to be sensational. What he's saying to the medical community who study the numbers and know what he's saying is not the same as what he said to Congress and he didn't try and clarify. And of course that testimony went to the public the large majority of which thought the sky was falling. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
The trouble with envisioning Covid-19 growth.
Top
Bottom