The Trouble With Chick Tracts...

dzheremi said:

I don't know if this represents some kind of generational divide or just the fact that I'm not an Evangelical Protestant whereas I presume a lot of people who take to his message and style probably are (or else they presumably wouldn't find it as effective or trustworthy as they apparently do/did), but I've honestly never found them worth taking seriously. The errors about forms of Christianity he did not personally belong to are perhaps understandable to a degree (after all, no one can be expected to know everything about every church on the planet), but that he presented wild speculation and conspiracy theories as fact (like in his tracts on Roman Catholicism) goes a bit beyond more generalized ignorance to a kind of weaponized, fact-resistant ignorance that it is hard to have much sympathy for, whether it is wielded toward supposedly good aims or not.

Click to expand...

Sabertooth said:

If true, what Bible(s) does that leave us with?

Click to expand...