Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Diane_Windsor said:I'll let my brother Paul speak for himself:
8For it is by grace you have been saved, through faithand this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God 9not by works, so that no one can boast.
Ephesians 2:8-9 (NIV)
DIANE
thereselittleflower said:Diane, a question that challenges one to prove the Trinity does raise eyebrows . .it raised mine for sure . . .
In Romans 10 Paul tells us that if we confess with our mouth that Jesus Christ is Lord and believe in our heart that God raised him from the dead, we will be saved. One cannot confess Jesus as Lord if one does not know who Jesus Christ is; or what it means for him to be Lord. Someone who is saved despite never having heard the name of Christ is an exception because of God's grace, not the rule.Cleany said:christian faith is not, i repeat not, believing in statements such as these. as diane put is grace is the only thing necessary for salvation.
I could, but by the wording of your post ("can anyone actually"....) I honestly don't know if you want the answer.can anyone actually explain what that means, and how jesus quite clearly didnt know all that god apparently does?
It is foolishness to say that we can fully understand the Trinity. But no one here has claimed that we can. Do you honestly think that we believe we have a total grasp on the things of God? Or are we defending what we do have reason to believe to be true?to me the trinity is like the big bang theory. it is mans best guess at an unanswerable question. it is not provable in any way, or really understandable. to believe it completely is utter denial and self-dishonesty.
I don't think I need to go into detail about the fallicious nature of this statement. Leave the psychology to Dr. Phil.to think that you "have to" believe it for some reason is fear.
We are allowed to think for ourselves, but this doesn't mean that our views will match up with reality. Some people believe the earth is young. Are they thinking for themselves, or just being ignorant?we are ALLOWED to think for ourselves and question things.
These beliefs are not man-made (that is, they were not imagined by the ancients). If they are man-made, there is no use in believing them, because they are not true. Period.but i dont see how i can be held "accountable" for not believing in ideas which are man made without questioning them.
So? Can you tell me what a high-context culture is? Why should we expect the writers of the Bible to classify concepts like the Trinity in the way that we would today? Please let me know what right you have to speak so vocally about something you have not bothered to carefully research.the word "trinity" isnt in the bible
Deut 27:12-15, 18 (NIV)not does the bible say anywhere that believing in "the trinity" is necessary for salvation, or that we will be held accountable for our beliefs.
Diane_Windsor said:You misread the statement, "You are not close to prooving that we must believe in the Trinity, etc."
IOW, he did not show that we must believe in the Trinity to have salvation.
See the difference?
DIANE
Cleany said:the "truth" you are talking about are mans explaination of ideas that are not able to be fully understood,
i question these ideas and the explainations of them. for this i can be held accountable.
but i dont see how i can be held "accountable" for not believing in ideas which are man made without questioning them.
the word "trinity" isnt in the bible, not does the bible say anywhere that believing in "the trinity" is necessary for salvation, or that we will be held accountable for our beliefs.
what the bible does mention about in reference to accountablility, MANY times, is our behaviour. but that would go against the sacred fundementalist idea of "grace through faith" wouldnt it?
it appears that "truth" and "biblical" are words whos meaning change depending on what people want to believe. perhaps god holds us accountable for our honesty with ourselves and others.
if anyone honestly thinks that their not going to hell depends on "believing" some statements about the nature of god and salvation then i ask them why do they think that? and why do they think that others should think the same way?
thereselittleflower said:But to be Christian, we must believe in the Trinity, for that is part of the definition of what it means to be a Christian . . .
So . . what does it mean to be a Christian?
If the Trinity is true, then we are called to persevere in that truth.
Part of persevering is doing as Paul said . . . to STAND FAST and HOLD TO the traditions given whether by word or by epistle.
Part of what was given by word, ie verbally taught by the apostles, is the doctrine of the Trinity.
How can we persevere by STANDING FAST and HOLDING to what has been taught by the Apostles if we reject some of what they taught?
To say that one does not have to believe in the Trinity to be saved may be techinically accurate on one level, but to say this without any qualification that it is a part of the ALL Truth handed down by the disciples and we are required to perservere in this truth, to STAND FAST AND HOLD TO this truth, and those who perservere to the end are the ones ASSURED of salvation, is to mislead and to give the impression that this is an "optional" belief .. .
SO . . believing in the Trinity is not optional for salvation if one knows it is true(whether one understands it or not is something else).
But the truth of the Trinity has been handed down to us by the Church and is supported in scripture,
and to imply that the Truth of the Trinity is optional in any way is to do a great disservice to others who may be struggling with aspects of the Christian faith . . it may cause one to become complacent and then presumptuous that they can be saved withou being true to the truth God has given them.
Believing in the Trinity is core to being a Christian . . . .
Diane_Windsor said:To be a Christian one must place their faith in Jesus of Nazareth and follow Him.
I'll attempt to give an illustration:
I am lost in a forest-I don't know where I am and I don't know where I'm going, and I am thirsty and hungry. I meet a man named John, whom I know absolutely nothing about. John tells me that he knows a way out of the forest that can lead me out-all I must do is trust and follow him. Again, I don't know anything this man, but since he is the only person I met in the forest I place my trust in him and decide to follow him. That afternoon he leds me out of the forest and into a city.
What ultimately got me out of the forest? Placing my trust in John and following him out. I didn't need to know or believe that he was really an angel sent from Heaven.
When you are lost in a forest and you come across a man named Jesus of Nazareth and you place your faith in him to lead you out of the forest then I don't see how God would condemn that person. I believe that God cares more about men following Jesus of Nazareth and their relationship with Him then what they believe about Jesus's nature, his relationship with God, etc.
To place your trust in Jesus of Nazareth and follow him out of the forest
In order to follow place my trust in Jesus of Nazareth and follow Him out of the forest do I need to believe or even know who He is, what His nature is, or how He is related to God? I am going to get out of the forest if I follow Jesus regardless of what my beliefs are about Him. OTHO, a person will not get out of the forest if they believe that Jesus is God, they believe the Trinity, etc. and refuse to place their trust and follow Jesus.
That is an opinion of a church council, which is not binding on anyone.
No denomination or person has it 100% right, so in some way, shape, or form, we have rejected or misinterpreted some teaching to a certain extent.
I don't recall Paul teaching us that in order to attain salvation that we must (by God's grace) place our faith in Jesus AND have it 100% correct.
If a person trusts Jesus of Nazareth and follows Him then are they going to get out of the forest or not?
When you follow the person who knows the forest like the back of their hand then you are going to get out of the forest.
I disagree. When Jesus says that He can get you out of the forest and you believe Him and follow, then you will make it out of the forest.
Whether or not the Trinity can be supported by Scripture is a matter of opinion. OTHO, some people firmly believe that Unitariansim can be supported by Scripture.
To say that a person must believe that Jesus of Nazareth is _____ in order to lead you out of the forest is in error. If you choose to trust Him and follow Him then He will lead you out of the forest.
I believe the core of being a Christian is to trust Jesus of Nazareth and follow Him out of the forest.
DIANE
thereselittleflower said:And to do this, one must properly understand who Jesus of Nazereth is . . . If one rejects the TRUTH about Jesus, then is one a Christian? Part of that TRUTH is WHO Jesus is . . . the GOD MAN . . 2nd Person of the Trinity, ETERNALLY BEGOTTEN, having no beginnig, no end . . .
Can one KNOWINGLY reject TRUTH without rejecting the One who IS TRUTH?
TRUTH got you out . . trusting in the TRUTH, not rejecting the TRUTH. The truth in your illustration was that John could lead you out.
You had a choice to make.
If you had not put your trust in the TRUTH (which at the time you did not know for sure was the truth), would you have gotten out of the forest?
Diane, let me take your illustration to the next level to try to show you what I am tyring to say.
Jesus comes to you in the forest . . He tells you that if you will trust and follow Him, that He will be able to lead you out of the forest to safetly..
You don't know even that He is God yet . . . . but you start to follow Him.
A ways down the path you come to a fork in the road . . one way looks easy . .the other way hard . . . You think that obviously the easy way must be the right way because it looks so well travelled . . . But Jesus says no, THIS is the way you must come . . . and you look again, it is rocky, uneven, narrow, overgrown, very difficult looking. . . There is a sign, it says "Trinity"
Will you choose to believe the TRUTH that the way out to safety involves accepting this portion of the path that looks so difficult?
If you choose to stop following Jesus on the path that He has set before you, will you escape the forest to the place of safety He wants to bring you to?
That's not true Diane.
That is an assumption . . . How do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt that no one Church has it 100% right?
Jesus told us that he who perseveres to the end will be saved . . He didn't say anyone else would be saved.
No, as I stated earlier the problem is that you do not think they are "clear-cut" at all. You think it is impossible to know the truth. Yet if it is impossible to know the truth, then how can we know anything? What does it mean "to know" something? Your own beliefs are self-refuting, they are unfalsifiable.Cleany said:i do not believe that things are a clear-cut as most christians seem to make out.
What makes this belief different than a belief in heaven, hell, or the Trinity?what i do believe however are my experiences of god through the holy spirit, and the commitment to jesus and god that lead me to those experiences.
No, you do not believe that Jesus is Lord. No one worships someone who is only Man. To do that is blasphemy.please understand that i am not saying that i dont believe that jesus isnt "lord", because i do.
The same mush you posted earlier without substantiation.what i am questioning is the idea the he is somehow fully god, which is even itself contradicted by the bible (which itself has many contradictions).
Obfuscation.i originally asked if anyone understands the trinity, clearly they do not.
Well then the Trinity when put into context in the Bible is clear cuti do not believe that things are a clear-cut as most christians seem to make out. heaven and hell - who knows? what is truth - who knows? what i do believe however are my experiences of god through the holy spirit, and the commitment to jesus and god that lead me to those experiences.
Cleany said:rather than replying directly to those who quoted me, i think its better i make a couple of things clear.
i do not believe that things are a clear-cut as most christians seem to make out. heaven and hell - who knows? what is truth - who knows? what i do believe however are my experiences of god through the holy spirit, and the commitment to jesus and god that lead me to those experiences.
in my experience what god has shown me and how he has helped me have had nothing whatsoever to do with doctrines, and nothing to do with ideas about the nature of jesus.
it is not necessary to believe certain things about jesus to experience god. isnt it asking anough that people believe that somehow a person is allied to god in such a way that you can call on his name in prayer?
please understand that i am not saying that i dont believe that jesus isnt "lord", because i do. what i am questioning is the idea the he is somehow fully god, which is even itself contradicted by the bible (which itself has many contradictions).
what i am saying is that understanding, technical prowess is not what salvation is all about. what it is about is the miracle that god became man and wants to have a relationship with us. it is about the experience of that relationship[ here and now, and god helping others through us. it is not about stupid thousand year old doctrines that wouldnt stand up in any court. and it is certainly not about "having to believe them or you go to hell". and they are not "the core of the christian faith". the core of the christian faith is jesus, not theories about him.
i originally asked if anyone understands the trinity, clearly they do not. i also asked why it was necessary to believe in it, the only answers that i have had are that either it isnt (correct lol) or that he is but with no reason given.
if it is necessary then why is it?
Why could there be no signs? If you saw this lonely sign would it help you out of the forest unless you had a guide to translate it? and what happened if someone was there before and left the sign? So therefore there are many reasons a sign could be in the forest it is in deciphering the sign and recognizing it's meaning that we may need help and in that we need to have to place trust in our guide.....Therese, there are no signs in the Forest, otherwise, we could get out ourselves. When you are lost in a forest it only matters that the Forest ranger knows the way out of the Forest and you put your faith in him to lead you out. However, you are correct that we do face many choices. Jesus can turn and say to me, "look at this bridge, we need to cross it to the other side." If I respond, "but Jesus more than just a few boards are missing from that bridge. I am not willing to cross it" then at that moment I have ceased to put my trust in him to lead us out of the forest.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?