Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I am aware that the modern theory takes in account genetics and other factors that Darwin didn't but I'm not an expert on it and wouldn't try to argue with you about it. Just because I posted a link about Tour doesn't mean I agree with everything Aussie Pete is saying
Arguments from incredulity go nowhere... just so you know.
What is a fact? The Theory of Evolution? Ottawak says you don't get that with a scientific theory. Read what he posted in his reply to Aussie Pete. Or that someone else would have discovered it? I can't see how you call that a fact
Your answer demonstrates that 160 years after Darwin creationists have zero science to offer but only ridicule and straw men. But doing science is way too hard for them.A brown-eyed mom and dad have a brown-eyed baby.
Therefore we crawled out of an ocean that was created when a comet hit the earth.
Luckily that Darwin was first. Wallaceonism is so much harder to pronounce.Absolutely.
He didn't invent evolution any more than Newton invented gravity and momentum.
The evidence is there to be discovered.
I suspect if there was no Darwin we'd still be here arguing with Creationists calling us Wallaceonians or something similar.
I'm familiar with Wallace. There were also other theories that didn't gain as much support Alternatives to Darwinian evolution - Wikipedia
no the mathematical probably (and other data) just gets ignored by many .... pretty INCREDULOUS ... just so you know.
Taking the OP into consideration, evolutionists are on the Titanic.And it illustrates - as already very often in this thread - that the OP was spot on.
And the creationists are the orchestra that continuous to play, ignoring all the evidence of sinking.Taking the OP into consideration, evolutionists are on the Titanic.
That would be a good comeback but the orchestra knew they were sinking. They weren't ignoring it they accepted itAnd the creationists are the orchestra that continuous to play, ignoring all the evidence of sinking.
Then why askI'm familiar with Wallace. There were also other theories that didn't gain as much support Alternatives to Darwinian evolution - Wikipedia
Taking the OP into consideration, evolutionists are on the Titanic.
Is it because the ToE was born out of thoseIt's going to take more than passive-aggressive revenge fantasies to disprove the ToE.
Is it because the ToE was born out of thosepassive-aggressive revenge fantasiesfight-or-flight fantasies?
What exactly is this numerical value of probability you refer to?The mathematical probability of "happen chance" over billions of years for even a single cell to "form" is horrendous much less with the cells ability to copy itself.
no the mathematical probably (and other data) just gets ignored by many .... pretty INCREDULOUS ... just so you know.
The mathematical probability arguments either contain no mathematics or the mathematics are completely bogus. They are ignored because they have been dismissed long ago.no the mathematical probably (and other data) just gets ignored by many .... pretty INCREDULOUS ... just so you know.
Evolution is a fact. The theory of evolution explains the process.What is a fact? The Theory of Evolution? Ottawak says you don't get that with a scientific theory. Read what he posted in his reply to Aussie Pete. Or that someone else would have discovered it? I can't see how you call that a fact
What is a fact? The Theory of Evolution? Ottawak says you don't get that with a scientific theory. Read what he posted in his reply to Aussie Pete. Or that someone else would have discovered it? I can't see how you call that a fact
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?