The Time Bubble Theory

[time]

Hi, I was over at EVC forum, and was able to come up with a theory. Here it is.
" The Time Bubble Theory
Time is a factor applicable to us. The time it takes light to travel as it relates to us is the speed of light. The time it takes light to travel the further away from us, and our created enviorment -becomes relative. All things it does out of our realm, are not the same as here, (near what will be the center of the universe). Therefore what would take 'here' so much time to happen, as you get very distant, takes less and maybe no time to happen! So what we are seeing then (in the cosmos) is not the record of what happened in some distant past, it's Now. Time, if not applied universally would seem to make more sense. So 'Time = Distance (divided by) Speed' is not true universally. Therefore as well as Einstein's formula not being applicable universally, the universe is neither HOMOGENOUS, nor ISOTROPIC! So we, at this juncture, are still ruled by, and under time. Everything then for us is affected by time, like how long light takes to travel from the sun, etc. Considering our own limitations of time, and how they will end, (according to the bible)-it is natural to try to project our concepts of time out into areas where it does not apply. Now exactly what are the boundries to the time bubble we are in, and does it end gradually, or abruptly, remains to be found out. (Feb, 2004, E.B.Davidavitch)"
Well, it seems this would allow for Creation. Anyone see a flaw, or, something to add, or any idea perhaps how to 'falsify' it? (They seem to think an idea must have a way to be falsified, or it isn't so good)

 

[Aduro Amnis]

Erm its very errornous... It was really hard to read with no line breaks but I'm assuming this article is believing that Light waves degrade over time, which they do not.
Consider time to be a sheet held two feet above the ground, put an apple(something super massive like a neutron star or black hole ) on there and the sheet sags.
So basically time is like a sheet not a bubble.

 

[Captain_Jack_Sparrow]

time = arkathon on EvC forum.

 

[Arikay]

Yeah, this sounds like the c-decay theory that was proposed by creationists (im thinking Humphrey but I could be wrong). JetBlack gave a good explenation of why this is probably not the case, because what we observe does not fit the theory.

 

[time]

"but I'm assuming this article is believing that Light waves degrade over time, which they do not."
No. it is saying that all forces, such as the speed of light, only apply in the sphere, or bubble, where we are, that time applies.

 

[time]

"c-decay theory that was proposed by creationists " No it's not a light theory, it's a time theory, where God has made man presently have time as part of our bubble, but not everywhere in the universe. For example, God is not bound by time, ("I AM"), nor are the angels, spirits, etc. And also, the whole cosmos outside our time limited bubble, is not under time either. This makes it possible to acount for the young Creation.

 

[Captain_Jack_Sparrow]

time (arkathon),

please give me direct evidence that God, angels etc. are not bound by time.

 

[time]

"please give me direct evidence that God, angels etc. are not bound by time"
I don't know if you mean from the bible. If so, Jsus said, "before Abraham was, I AM" That does not sound very bound by time to me.

 

[Captain_Jack_Sparrow]

Wow,

is that your standard for evidence. The prosecution rests, your honour.

 

[time]

How would you like it proved that God is not bound by time (which He created!)? Apparently His written record doesn't cut it for you?

 

[Arikay]

Lets say this bubble exists, it still doesn't explain an old earth.

What predictions does this bubble theory make?

 

[funyun]

How would you like it proved that God is not bound by time (which He created!)? Apparently His written record doesn't cut it for you?

The Bible is no more a written record than the Metamorphoses.

 

[time]

"The Bible is no more a written record than the Metamorphoses"
It is written It is a record. God wrote some of it personally, with His Own finger. His Son also is responsible for so much of the New Testament (Look at a red letter edition) I've heard of His Book. So has the world. I never heard of yours.

 

[Arikay]

What parts did jesus write himself?

 

[time]

"Lets say this bubble exists, it still doesn't explain an old earth"
Well, once you conceed the heavens, I'll be happy to shed some light on your supposed 'old' earth!

 

[time]

"What parts did jesus write himself?"
Throughout the New Testament you'll find the direct words of Jesus, usually in Red letters. Spoken directly, and witnessed by many.

 

[Arikay]

again, what predictions does this theory make?
What evidence do we have that time changes when you get a certain distance into space?

why not explain the age of the earth now, since if the goal is to show a young earth, it is definetly needed.

"Lets say this bubble exists, it still doesn't explain an old earth"
Well, once you conceed the heavens, I'll be happy to shed some light on your supposed 'old' earth!

 

[Arikay]

So, they are not actually written by him.
They are written by someone else who was quoting Jesus, often written down many years after the event happend, and the only evidence that we have that those exact words were witnessed by many is from the author who is quoting him.

Not exactly "with his own finger" as you said.

"What parts did jesus write himself?"
Throughout the New Testament you'll find the direct words of Jesus, usually in Red letters. Spoken directly, and witnessed by many.

 

[funyun]

"The Bible is no more a written record than the Metamorphoses"
It is written It is a record. God wrote some of it personally, with His Own finger. His Son also is responsible for so much of the New Testament (Look at a red letter edition) I've heard of His Book. So has the world. I never heard of yours.

The fact that you have never heard of the Metamorphoses points more to a lack of education on your part than it does an indication that they r untrue.

Quick literature lesson:
The Metamorphoses was a collection of stories gathered by the Roman poet Ovid during the early days of the Roman Empire. It's a retelling of old Greek/Roman myths (like the story of Daedalus and Icarus).

More info: http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/latin/ovid/

My point, which seems to have been lost on u, was that the Metamorphoses was a collection of myths, like the Bible.

"What parts did jesus write himself?"
Throughout the New Testament you'll find the direct words of Jesus, usually in Red letters. Spoken directly, and witnessed by many.

I love these threads that go round and round. You have no proof of this. I don't know how many ways that sentence can be said b4 it becomes utterly redundant.

 

[time]

"The fact that you have never heard of the Metamorphoses points more to a lack of education "
You feel it seems this was an impotant part of your educatin. Don't feel you have to share why. I couldn't much care.
"My point, which seems to have been lost on u, was that the Metamorphoses was a collection of myths, like the Bible"
Some point. If I had a nickel for every time I heard that I could buy a darwin book to have on hand, just in case there be a toilet paper shortage.
"You have no proof of this"
In a court the eyewitness testimony of many people is proof. I don't think I can help you much on that one, you'll have to decide for yourself. I'm with the Almighty on this one.