The Theory Of Evolution

[brightmorningstar]

haven't seen a single scientific paper listing the Bible in its references.

Have you forgotten the punchline to this joke or is it coming later?

 

[Aeneas]

Have you forgotten the punchline to this joke or is it coming later?

Huh?

I don't get what you mean. You said the Bible is being used as a primary source of reference, which simply isn't true. I've never seen the Bible listed in the reference section of any scientific paper, poster or presentation.

 

[brightmorningstar]

Aeneas,
I dont get what you mean either, your remark implies you dont understand what science is if you expect the spiritual to be included.

 

[Aeneas]

Aeneas,
I dont get what you mean either, your remark implies you dont understand what science is if you expect the spiritual to be included.

I don't expect the spiritual to be included. That would be why the Bible isn't used as a reference in science.

 

[brightmorningstar]

Aeneas,
sorry, still not following you, if

I don't expect the spiritual to be included.

then why would you write..

haven't seen a single scientific paper listing the Bible in its references

as you say, that would be the reason.

or was your comment sarcasm?

 

[pgp_protector]

Aeneas,
sorry, still not following you, if

then why would you write..
as you say, that would be the reason.

or was your comment sarcasm?

Because of this post.

what is sad about darwins findings of evolution is that he never even had fossils to compare.. he didn't have the knowledge of today.. i find it fascinating how science is now using the bible as a primary source of reference.. that is the wonderful nature of God.. how can we not just stand in "awe" when we marvel at how He turns these things all around in His own time.. praise the Lord of Hosts..

 

[brightmorningstar]

pgp protector,
Ok thanks, makes sense now.
But not really, why not affirm God's creation as 99% ?
this is a response one would expect from a secular liberal

haven't seen a single scientific paper listing the Bible in its references

 

[tulc]

pgp protector,
Ok thanks, makes sense now.
But not really, why not affirm God's creation as 99% ?
this is a response one would expect from a secular liberal

Or from someone who is speaking the truth? ...well unless you have a link to a few that do reference the Bible?
tulc(tends to think God is a God of truth, no matter who's speaking it)

 

[56Bluesman]

thanks to you for an informative post.
I note the flaws in intelliegnt design theory is also valid, though it is of course also a theory and which poses some fundamental potentially deal breaking questions about the theory of evolution.

Thanks for your kind comments regarding my post. I am a Christian who does wish to seek the truth both spiritual and also what is displayed in God's handiwork manifested in His creation. I value science greatly and if new discoveries causes me to reconsider things so be it. So far I've not found science to be incompatible with my faith in the least.

 

[Perhaps Today]

MOD HAT ON

Thread was moved here from Christian Current Affairs, where it would be a better fit.

MOD HAT OFF​