- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,718
- 52,526
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
How about one that lays eggs? would that do?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
How about one that lays eggs? would that do?For the third time, if you'd like to falsify evolution, find a fossil of a mammal with scales or feathers.
How about one that lays eggs? would that do?
Right ... so finding a fossil of a mammal with scales or feathers will just predicate a new species, won't it?No. Egg-laying is the ancestral state.
Ever heard of monotremes? It's a term coined to account for the embarrassingly evolution-pwning platypus.You're as desperate as the other guy...
No. The species that ultimately led to mammals laid eggs. It did not have feathers.Right ... so finding a fossil of a mammal with scales or feathers will just predicate a new species, won't it?
Biological evolution is an important feature of the real world. It happened, and it's still happening.Biological evolution is an open source philosophy.
Yeah.Ever heard of monotremes?
Careful, AV -- you're displaying the depth of your knowledge of evolution again.It's a term coined to account for the embarrassingly evolution-pwning platypus.
Ever heard of monotremes? It's a term coined to account for the embarrassingly evolution-pwning platypus.
At least it keeps educatees from accusing God of deception, though.
Ever heard of monotremes? It's a term coined to account for the embarrassingly evolution-pwning platypus.
At least it keeps educatees from accusing God of deception, though.
That suits me just fine.Careful, AV -- you're displaying the depth of your knowledge of evolution again.
Ever heard of monotremes? It's a term coined to account for the embarrassingly evolution-pwning platypus.
I have no doubt whatsoever evolutionists can explain it.Over here in the real world, there is nothing about platypus which can't be explained from the classic evolutionary framework.
Yup.I'm from Australia. Within an hours drive I could be within the habitat of both the platypus and echidna.
More like you don't.Allandavid said:You don't know what you're talking about...
I have no doubt whatsoever evolutionists can explain it.
And I'm sure they would be able to explain a mammal with scales and feathers if they found one.
Look how quickly they explained Nebraska man.
Pluto, on the other hand, took longer.
But as you guys like to point out, we shouldn't compare organic things with inorganic.
Just don't feed me a line like this:Then your objection is meaningless.
... and expect me to believe it.... if you'd like to falsify evolution, find a fossil of a mammal with scales or feathers.
Is English not your first language? For the third time, if you'd like to falsify evolution, find a fossil of a mammal with scales or feathers. Why is it that no such fossil has ever been found do you think...?
surprise: human indeed have genes for feathers development:
http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2014/11/20/your-inner-feather/
so evolution is false now?
To see how far back the evolution of feather genes went, the scientists compared birds to a wide range of vertebrates, including humans, turtles, and pufferfish. They found that the instructions for making feathers got their start a long, long time before feathers themselves. The genes that establish the basic pattern of placodes already existed in the common ancestor of living fish and birds (and us)–in other words, about half a billion years ago.
not at all. in this case they will claim for gene loss or convergent evolution. again: evolution cant be falsified.
Please quote the texts/scientists/organisations that claim that evolution is 'fact'...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?