Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Unless we vote out this liberal madness this country most likely will not survive.Can I extend the thread a little please...
Are we confident that the US will survive the present onslaught and be a significant player in end time events ???
Do we see any biblical indicators suggesting it will ???
When a baby is born a highly trained Doctor who delivers said baby examines the babies anatomy and makes a scientific determination as to the sex of the baby. Then that sex is recorded on an official birth certificate. Not hard at all.
I answered you were just impatient. Post # 116
Okay, keep lying to yourself.
I gave you more of a definition than the Supreme Court nominee, ok let’s play your game. This is really not about science or as you say a scientific definition, it is far more sinister than that. When my daughter was born I was present to witness that miraculous event. When SHE came into the world the doctor did not test HER chromosomes, a mere visual inspection was sufficient for the doctor. Can you believe it the doctor was right she is now a full grown WOMAN who has had babies. We are really not dealing so much with science here as we are an EVIL ideology. The reason the Supreme Court nominee did not want to answer the question was not because she couldn’t answer, it was because she was afraid to potentially upset the woke crowd. This evil ideology being thrust on many of our young children in some schools is the real issue. You can be the gender you feel like you should be is meant to confuse and point young innocent children into an alternate life style. That is the bottom line here it is an evil movement with no redeeming qualities. The Bible definition of a woman in the book of Genesis tells us a woman can bear children. Just ask a woke intellectual if a man can have a child and watch them squirm. Go ahead and display your scientific knowledge about a woman and ignore the real spiritual problem before us. Would you like to engage in a spiritual Bible based discussion on this topic that would really get to the heart of what is happening in America today?It is surprisingly easy to define a woman biologically, although I wouldn't expect a Supreme Court Justice to know what it is.
It's just kind of funny to see that all the guys hyperventilating about a nominee not saying what it is, don't know themselves what it is.
Since none of them are going to step up and deliver, here it is:
"A woman is an adult human who does not have a Y chromosome."
If anyone wants to know why it has to be worded that way, we can talk.
I gave you more of a definition than the Supreme Court nominee
Can you believe it the doctor was right she is now a full grown WOMAN who has had babies.
The Bible definition of a woman in the book of Genesis tells us a woman can bear children.
Just ask a woke intellectual if a man can have a child and watch them squirm. Go ahead and display your scientific knowledge about a woman and ignore the real spiritual problem before us.
So an adult woman who can't bear children is not a woman? C'mon. You know better than that.
Maybe if you went to a pew in the back of the church and prayed with a penitent heart, He might give you some guidance.
I'm just amused by the fact that those on the far right are outraged that a Supreme Court nominee didn't offer a definition of "woman" when almost none of them are capable of doing so.
Postvieww said: ↑
The Bible definition of a woman in the book of Genesis tells us a woman can bear children.
Of course there are women who for various physical reasons cannot bear children.
You are just amused by anyone on the far right because in my opinion you feel superior to all of them.
I am hearing a broken record no one spent a quarter to play.So an adult woman who can't bear children is not a woman? C'mon. You know better than that.
So that definition fails. Try again? I'm really amused that all these far-right people are clutching their pearls that a Supreme Court nominee didn't define "woman", when they can't do it themselves.
You trying way too hard to show your superiority here on science. Let’s discuss the real reason this is even a topic today. Hint hint it is not about chromosomes.So an adult woman who can't bear children is not a woman? C'mon. You know better than that.
So that definition fails. Try again? I'm really amused that all these far-right people are clutching their pearls that a Supreme Court nominee didn't define "woman", when they can't do it themselves.
You trying way too hard to show your superiority here on science.
Let’s discuss the real reason this is even a topic today.
Hint hint it is not about chromosomes.
As I suggested earlier, maybe Chuck Schumer should have a birds-and-the-bees talk with the Senate republicans.
Now Chuckie is the expert
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?