First of all, it takes faith to be justified, as Abraham was. His faith was justified, or "perfected" by his works.
Your reference to verse 16 is not a good one. Verse 16 is speaking of the saved man. The one who is saved can either subject himself to sin or obedience. The saved man has this choice. It is an entirely different question as to the unsaved one. The unsaved one only has the choice to be obedient once he has been regenerated, as in verse 17. They were already saved when they became obedient- "you became obedient from the heart to that form of teaching to which you were committed..."
Abraham was justified by an
obedient faith, he did not have 'faith alone'. As Paul and James both show obedience leads to justification.
All Paul is saying in Rom 6:16 is that one is a servant to whom he obeys--period. All the rest you say above you have added to this simple verse. The "unsaved" and "saved" alike can choose to obey sin unto death or obedience to righteousness. Nowhere does Paul say in this verse "the unsaved one only has the choice to be obedient once he has been regenerated.." This is
your theology that you try to add to this verse.
Jesusfreak5000 said:
Verse 6 talks about the old self, before we were saved, before we were crucified with Christ. We were slaves to sin. How could we free ourselves? We couldn't. We were depraved, and that is clear from the text.
Nothing remotely in all of Rom 6 says "we were depraved", again this is your theology you try to add to this chapter. Those that choose to be water baptized are the ones that crucify the old man of sin and walk in newness of life. In verse 3 Paul says "so many of us as were baptizedinto Jesus Christ"-- not any more, not any less than those baptized become free from sin (justified)
Jesusfreak5000 said:
That sort of interpretation will not hold up.
Eph 2:3 Among them we too all formerly lived in the lusts of our flesh, indulging the desires of the flesh and of the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, even as the rest.
Go even further and see how Paul includes himself with them in verses 4 and on...he is speaking of the whole of Christians, not just the church of Ephesus. Before we were saved, we were "by nature" children of wrath. And go ahead and interpret it in your own way, as far as a habitual practice, you still get the same thing. It's just that this text is surely not specific to the Ephesians as Paul included himself with them, signifying the entire Church, and even further, all of humanity (even as the rest).
I gave you Strong's definition of the word 'nature', so my post will "hold up", it is "totally depravity" that fails here. No where in the entire book of Ephesians did Paul say that he or the Ephesians were born sinners. The Ephesians were dead "in your trespasses and sins", it was their sin not Adam's. Paul goes on to plainly show that the Ephesians former life-style was one of constantly sinning, they sinned so much it became part of their nature. No where in the entire NT did Jesus Christ or an inspired apostle ever say people are "born sinners".
Jesusfreak5000 said:
Actually, we see from Cain the exact opposite, do we not? He failed because he was depraved! He did not put faith in God in order to strengthen himself, he was selfish and relied upon his own power. Just because God told Cain to rule over sin does not mean that he even could have. The entire world was given a perfect standard to meet, and they couldn't meet it. No one could fulfill the law, it only brought the knowledge of sin and the need of a savior. It all just proves my point. Man is depraved apart from God. We have all of history to back it up. Just because God asks of something does not even mean that it was possible. It is obvious that Cain would fail without God's help. You would agree with that too, I would think.
No where does the context say Cain was "depraved" , again that is
your theology. In Gen 4:7 God used the conditional word "IF", IF thou does well IF thou doest not well. It was Cains choice to do well or not. If Cain were "depraved" why would God tell him to rule over sin? Would God not know this would be impossible if Cain were "depraved"? God knew Cain was not "depraved", that Cain could choose, therefore God told him to rule over sin.
JesusFreak5000 said:
John 3:5 does not say that at all-
Jhn 3:5 Jesus answered, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
Regeneration is a rebirth of the Spirit, allowing man to place faith in Christ and become saved. Nowhere in the text you have quoted is that view nullified. If anything, it supports my view.
You are born again (regenerated) before you see the kingdom of God.
The "rebirth" consists of Spirit
and water. A reference to water baptism, thus one chooses to be water baptized or not, chooses to be born again or not. Jesus
commanded one to be born again, He used the words "except" and "must", so one can obey or disobey this command to be born again. Being born again is not something forced upon any one by the Lord.
JesusFreak5000 said:
It is not God's will that all men be born again, it is His desire. One is volitional and one is emotional. He loves all men and desires that they come to Him. On the flipside, not all will come become because not all men have been called. Also, you presuppose that man can be willing to obey God. But, as we have seen, he cannot and will not. He is depraved.
The invitation/call has gone out to all, but all will not answer it. There is a difference between being called and answering the call. Example, the Calvinst will look at the people at a party and say "only those present were the only ones invited". Those present were the ones that
responded to the invitation, every one was invited, but only those that
accepted the invitation came.--many are called but few chosen. The 'chosen few' are the ones that
answered the call, the call did not go out only to the chosen few. Again, Jesus nor any apostles said people are born sinners/depraved.
JesusFreak5000 said:
He also does not "randomly" choose who will be saved. He knew His elect before the foundations of the world. That doesn't sound like random.
Before the foundation of the world God knew His people, Christians, would be saved, but God does not decide who will be a Chrsitain and who will not be, we each have to make that choice for ourselves. Nowhere does the bible say God predestined certain idividuals to be saved and predestined certain others to be lost.
JesusFrfeak5000 said:
What is your point? Baptize with the Holy Spirit, yes. Who does that? God. I don't get what the point is. One does not "obey" in baptism, he cannot baptize himself with the Spirit. As you say,-
by who? God.
There is no such thing today as baptism with the Holy Spirit. Water baptism is commanded so one can obey or disobey this command, the Ephesians Paul wrote to obeyed this command to be water baptized. No verse in Ephesians says there were baptized with the Holy Spirit.
They walked in newness because they had been water baptized, i.e., they obeyed.
JesusFreak5000 said:
Once again, you presupposing that the repentence comes from the man himself. We know that this can't be true, because man cannot repent of his own volition. He is first regenerated. That is where the repentence comes from.
I presupposed nothing, I showed what the verses say and they say obedience
before receiving the gift of the Holy Ghost. Acts 2:38; Acts 5:32 and Gal 4:6 absolutely destroy the Calvinistic idea of 'regeneration'. You desperately try to say "man cannot repent of his own volition. He is first regenerated," Yet these three simple verses do not say this at all!!!. It's
obedience before receiving the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Repentance is something commanded, so it can be obeyed or disobeyed, and not unti it is obeyed, one cannot receive the gift of the Hoy Ghost. The order of Acts 2:38 put both repentance and baptism (obedience) before receiving the gift of the Holy Ghost, just as Acts 5:32 puts obedience before it also.
JesusFreak5000 said:
Nope. Regeneration, which ushers in repentence and faith by God, who then adopts you as a son at justification and as a pledge gives you the Holy Spirit, and you start to be sanctfied.
You give no verses to prove your statement above, I have given you three [Acts 2:38; Acts 5:32 Gal 4:6] that plainly show obedience before receivng the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Acts 5:32 does
NOT say God gives the Holy Ghost to them He has chosen to regenerate. It
DOES say "whom (Holy Ghost) God hath given to them that obey him.
JesusFreak5000 said:
This paragraph shows me that you do not understand the doctrine of depravity, nor the Calvinist school of thought. I do have free will within God's decree. I do actually wish to do things, and do them because I want to. Of course, the only reason I want to is because it was decreed. But you won't accept that.
Besides, we are speaking of volition, as in terms of inclination of the heart and mind, not the foreordination of God. Let's stick to one subject.
When I use scripture to refute the false idea of total depravity, the claim is made I do not understand it. I understand it, I understand it to be a false teaching that came from man, not God. Are those that are not of the "elect", the "lost", did they choose this for themselves or was this forced upon them by God? Those that are part of the "elect", did they choose this for themselves or was this forced upon them by God?