Yes I have. God created them that way, and the gift of evolving was part of it, especially in the former nature when most of the changes and adapting/evolving happened.Dad, you have not explained why the basic categories of life fit into a nested pattern, whereas other natural objects such as minerals and mountains do not do this.
I think you see the pattern whether it exists or not. You stick unrelated fossils together and make a pattern in your mind that makes them kin.ok you accept evolution at a family level and admit it can be responsible for the nested hierarchy at the family level. How do you explain that all of life fits this pattern, that there is a tree of the families of life that shows a nested hierarchy? See figure 1 here. 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: Phylogenetics
You can't be serious. You cut off the words following that gave you a few examples:
So what all was in the horse family? Were the horse, zebra, and donkey all in that family? How about the extinct merychippus, mesahippus, and eohippus, all of which have left abundant fossils after the KT boundary? Did these all descend from one pair on the ark?Can you actually address this please?
I would suspect that all those critters were post flood. I suspect that the whole period of the Cenozoic I think it was you call it...when the creatures you cite lived...was mere centuries. Possibly the time after the flood when nature was still different. That would mean no radioactive decay dates are possible, and no old age dates based on how long you think it would take to evolve. No dates of how long you think layers would need to form..based on the present nature.
So what I suspect we have with your horse like animals is creatures in that few centuries that started to or could fossilize. There also, in this scenario have been real horses running around or being ridden by man!
In other words, even though the flood may have been around the KT layer...the nature change may be much higher in the geo column!
Don't blame me for imaginary millions of years. I go by real time.Ok 65 million years of the geologic column is 4500 years in Dad years.
THAT is you mistake, Diagnosis complete. Try to prove the dates.
And yet the fossil record shows horse evolution took tens of millions of years in geologic years. How many years did it take in Dad years?
if the flood was at the kt boundary, than over 90% of the fossil record was before the flood. So why is it that we have an abundance of fossils before the flood, most of which are very different from modern life?
In other words, a lot of creatures lived on the wonderful world also before the flood. This is news? Of course they would be different! The evidence mounts!
After you prove there was the present state/nature existing then...yes you can. That will never happen though.remember that we can use radiometric dating.
Continental drift was rapid in that former nature, volcanic activity resulted of course also, and in that former nature, we cannot impose today's ice layering realities!In addition we have evidence such as the great layers of rock, the many volcanoes, the distance traveled by the continents, and ice layers. The kt boundary was formed long ago.
These all were things happening in the former nature!
Amazing.
Upvote
0