Bugeyedcreepy
Well-Known Member
- Jun 7, 2016
- 1,660
- 1,431
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
Because cars don't do that. Can you point to a car that does that?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Because cars don't do that. Can you point to a car that does that?Why not? If it has the properties of a car otherwise, why would it become not-a-car if you give it an extra property?
Sigh.Why not? If it has the properties of a car otherwise, why would it become not-a-car if you give it an extra property?
Why not? If it has the properties of a car otherwise, why would it become not-a-car if you give it an extra property?
When biological organisms evolve, the changes occur in their DNA. It's the variation that occurs during DNA copying during reproduction which provides the variation to an organism's phenotype (i.e. the organism's physical structure) on which natural selection can act.
Because cars don't do that. Can you point to a car that does that?
so this isnt a car if it has a self replicating system?:If it has a self replicating system then it isn't a car.
from your description, it seems like a watch to me... even the maker of the watch, Apple (and not another pair of watches with too much spare time together unsupervised) call it a smartwatch.My Apple watch does a lot of things that people could say "a watch doesn't do that" about. Is it not a watch?
well, it doesn't have one, so no.so this isnt a car if it has a self replicating system?:
(image from wiki)
but i said it has one in this case. so its a car or not under this situation?well, it doesn't have one, so no.
No, not a car because it's imaginary in this situation.but i said it has one in this case. so its a car or not under this situation?
Why don't you talk about a Horse, that's a form of transport that reproduces... we can use that because everyone will understand what you're talking about then.but i said it has one in this case. so its a car or not under this situation?
That's a car without the capability of self replication.so the image above isnt a car. ok.
Let's be fair. He may have thought the 2006 Pixar amimated film, Cars was a documentary.If you want to post a picture of a car that is capable of self replication, then you need to post a picture of a car capable of self replication. Which is impossible because such a thing doesn't exist.
but i said that in this theoretical case this car is able to self replicate. so in this case it will be a car or not?That's a car without the capability of self replication.
If you want to post a picture of a car that is capable of self replication, then you need to post a picture of a car capable of self replication. Which is impossible because such a thing doesn't exist.
but i said that in this theoretical case this car is able to self replicate. so in this case it will be a car or not?
but i said that in this theoretical case this car is able to self replicate. so in this case it will be a car or not?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?