Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I have reviewed the evidence and reached a conclusion. See Are There Credible Witnesses to the Resurrection, Part IIIt isn't a claim. The work that is being done is evidence. You're unwillingness to be aware of the evidence doesn't make it any less real. If I was unaware of evidence that there's a genetic link predisposing a person toward alcoholism, for example, and the evidence was real, my ignorance doesn't make the evidence any less real. If you're unaware of the evidence of Christ's resurrection, because you are ignorant of it, that doesn't make the evidence less real. It just means that you are ignorant of it.
You haven't "reviewed the evidence", because the real evidence eludes you, as it eludes all who are not willing to deny themselves, take up their cross, and follow Christ:I have reviewed the evidence and reached a conclusion. See Are There Credible Witnesses to the Resurrection, Part II
You haven't "reviewed the evidence", because the real evidence eludes you, as it eludes all who are not willing to deny themselves, take up their cross, and follow Christ:
"Although Jesus had performed so many signs in their presence, they still did not believe in Him.This was to fulfill the word of Isaiah the prophet:
'Lord, who has believed our message? And to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?'
For this reason they were unable to believe. For again, Isaiah says:
'He has blinded their eyes
and hardened their hearts,
so that they cannot see with their eyes,
and understand with their hearts,
and turn,
and I would heal them.'
Isaiah said these things because he saw Jesus’ glory and spoke about Him." (John 12:37-41)
So, whatever conclusion you've come to has no more truth to it than if a person who has always been blind were to say that they have come to the conclusion that their are no such things as stars in the night sky, because they have never seen any stars in the night sky.
Christ is still performing many signs in our presence, but you can't see them, and won't see them until you are darned good and ready to.
since a car is only one possibility out of many it will be very rare to find such a case (car) if nature indeed evolved naturally.If cars could evolve naturally then why don't cars evolve naturally?
but it can reproduce in this case since it has a self replicating system. so this claim is wrong.BECAUSE CARS CAN'T REPRODUCE!
the object by natural selection+changes over time.That doesn't answer the question. What specifically would be changing?
the object by natural selection+changes over time.
on the creature.Still too vague. What specifically is changing?
For example, when populations of living organisms evolve, where does the underlying changes occur?
on the creature.
So if you want to suggest that non biological things can evolve in the same manner, then what is their DNA equivalent? Where are these evolutionary changes occurring?
Got any arguments besides ad hominems?Christ is still performing many signs in our presence, but you can't see them, and won't see them until you are darned good and ready to.
Making a small car is not the same as having a baby car.
what is the difference?
See if this helps. The men in the picture below are either a) making toy trucks or b) making babies. Are you able to tell which?
It isn't a claim. The work that is being done is evidence. You're unwillingness to be aware of the evidence doesn't make it any less real. If I was unaware of evidence that there's a genetic link predisposing a person toward alcoholism, for example, and the evidence was real, my ignorance doesn't make the evidence any less real. If you're unaware of the evidence of Christ's resurrection, because you are ignorant of it, that doesn't make the evidence less real. It just means that you are ignorant of it.
If it has a self replicating system then it isn't a car.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?