Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Good advice. That's what I did to you a long time ago.
Because I am trying to show you the mistake the translators of the NIV made in calling the beast king "it" instead of "him".I know that, but he never said he uses the NIV and he quoted scripture from the KJV in his post. So, why didn't you change the question so that it actually applied to him if you wanted him to answer the same question, only using his preferred translation instead?
I know that (hello?), but he never said he uses the NIV and he quoted scripture from the KJV in his post. So, why didn't you change the question so that it actually applied to him if you wanted him to answer the same question, only using his preferred translation instead?
Yes, I am well aware that "the beast king" is not about you. LOL. I have already spent too much time responding to your beliefs that you have all to yourself. What does that accomplish? It's pointless, really. It's not as if I should be concerned that you will influence anyone to agree with you on all this. That is highly unlikely. So, I'm done with this. I'm not saying I won't talk to you about other things, but I don't want to take any more time talking about things that only you believe. If you can't understand that, then you're not even trying.The question is not about me personally, but about....
Where in your NIV translation is king 8 in Revelation 13 ?
King 8 is the beast king in Revelation 17:11.
Because I am trying to show you the mistake the translators of the NIV made in calling the beast king "it" instead of "him".
LOL. But, you were asking him to answer the question, so referring to "your NIV translation" in response to him, a KJV user, made no sense. Why not just admit that? Swallow your pride for once and admit you made a mistake there. Can you do that?Because I am trying to show you the mistake the translators of the NIV made in calling the beast king "it" instead of "him".
LOL. I guess it didn't work since he's somehow still talking to you.And yet you are talking to me? You must have missed me.
The kjv refers to the beast king as "him" not "it". So the problem is not with the kjv.LOL. But, you were asking him to answer the question, so referring to "your NIV translation" in response to him, a KJV user, made no sense. Why not just admit that? Swallow your pride for once and admit you made a mistake there. Can you do that?
When a poster is put on someone's "ignore" list. It is optional to see the ignored person's comments selectively by clicking onLOL. I guess it didn't work since he's somehow still talking to you.
Your problem is not being willing to humble yourself when YOU make a mistake, regardless of whether or not you think the NIV translators made a mistake. And you mistakenly asked TribulationSigns to answer a question according to his NIV translation even though he doesn't use the NIV. You're probably embarrassed that you did that, but mistakes happen. Just own up to it. Denying it only makes things worse.The kjv refers to the beast king as "him" not "it". So the problem is not with the kjv.
The kjv refers to the beast king as "him" not "it". So the problem is not with the kjv.
I am aware of that. I wasn't meaning that I didn't think there was any way you could still talk to him if you wanted to. But, why would you want to talk to him now if he's on your ignore list? Maybe you should just take him off the list at this point since you apparently have no problem talking to him now.When a poster is put on someone's "ignore" list. It is optional to see the ignored person's comments selectively by clicking on
"Show ignored content" on the bottom of the page.
When a poster is put on someone's "ignore" list. It is optional to see the ignored person's comments selectively by clicking on
"Show ignored content" on the bottom of the page.
It's completely absurd and contradicts what Daniel and Jesus Himself said will happen to unbelievers who are resurrected.So? The beast is still Satan. What you do not understand t hat the beast themselves is the systemic rule of Satan, "through carmal men," that are "as beasts!" It is talking about Satan, and his ministers of unrighteousness, which are PEOPLE! Not one man with a superpower in your flawed doctrine and charts.
Thus how Satan rules through them to attack the Lord's people. Not taking over one human's soul and using its resurrected body to attack God's people. Thats absurd!
I am not getting side tracked. My question to you was...Your problem is not being willing to humble yourself when YOU make a mistake, regardless of whether or not you think the NIV translators made a mistake. And you mistakenly asked TribulationSigns to answer a question according to his NIV translation even though he doesn't use the NIV. You're probably embarrassed that you did that, but mistakes happen. Just own up to it. Denying it only makes things worse.
It's completely absurd and contradicts what Daniel and Jesus Himself said will happen to unbelievers who are resurrected.
Daniel 12:2 Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt.
John 5:28 “Do not be amazed at this, for a time is coming when all who are in their graves will hear his voice 29 and come out—those who have done what is good will rise to live, and those who have done what is evil will rise to be condemned.
Scripture teaches that a time is coming when all dead unbelievers will be resurrected "to shame and everlasting contempt" and will be condemned at that time. There is nothing in scripture which teaches that any dead unbeliever will ever be resurrected back to mortal life while then being allowed to continue living their lives. So, he's just making things up that contradict scriptures like these and are not taught anywhere in scripture.
More a case of fortifying why I have you on ignore.You still miss me by showing my ignored content and replying.
More a case of fortifying why I have you on ignore.
Translation: You refuse to acknowledge that you made a mistake in the way you replied to TribulationSigns. So be it.I am not getting side tracked.
How many times do I have to say that I believe every reference to the beast in Revelation is to the same beast which takes different forms as the years go by? You disagree and think that there are at least three different beasts (even besides the second beast/false prophet first mentioned in Revelation 13, I think) that are referenced in Revelation. Whatever. I don't have any interest in discussing this any further with you because it's pointless for me to refute something that only you believe. So, just accept that and move on.My question to you was...
Where in your NIV translation is king 8 in Revelation 13 ?
King 8 is the beast king in Revelation 17:11.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?