Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Oh my. I just read a reviewer's synopsis of that book on Amazon and I don't know if I could read it. That from someone who considers himself able to stomach uncomfortable truths. Got nauseous just reading the review.
I would pose a similar question to you...can you name a popular conspiracy that (you think) involves the government that you don't believe in? JFK, 9/11, Waco, Aurora shooting, Newtown shooting, Osama Bin Laden's death...etc.? Please point out which ones you think are supported by real facts, and which ones are just the result of people projecting their distrust of government into wild speculation and reactionary explanations.
Btodd
...FEMA death camps with automated guillotines and millions of coffins stacked and reaxy, faked Moon landing, Ruby Ridge, Oklahoma City, the Long Island missile attack, MK Ultra, and Agenda 21... I think thats most of them?
Keeping in mind this thread is primarily about the Sandy Hook incident, going into detail about what is listed in the quotes above is, well, inappropriate. Here are my answers:
JFK - I don't believe the "lone gunman" explanation, and I suspect the CIA was behind it for various reasons
9/11 - I'll just say this, after all that has come out about this event, if a person still believes 19 hijackers with box-cutters were responsible for 3 buildings coming down because "they hate our freedoms", I believe such a person is living in a corporate fantasy world they are unwilling to depart from.
Waco - I really don't know much about this at all to have an opinion.
Aurora - I doubt the official story based on inconsistent witness accounts, obvious (to me, anyway) actors and dodging/ignoring important questions, such as if the cinema had camera surveillance, and other factors. However, I do not claim to know exactly what happened.
Newtown - Obviously I doubt the official story of this event for multiple reasons
Bin Laden's death - er, you mean the recent death Obama took credit for? I already believed Bin Laden was dead long before and the video and audio attributed to him in more recent years was an actor. Scarecrow to keep the "war on terror" going.
FEMA death camps - I don't know for sure. It's within the realm of possibility just like Germany's concentration camps, or even America's concentration camps for the Japanese during WW2, but I haven't done much in depth looking into it.
Moon landing - I have my doubts, but I do not know for sure.
Ruby Ridge - I know next to nothing about this to have an opinion.
OK City bombing - Doubt official story based on a few things I've read, but don't know enough about
Long Island Missile attack - I know next to nothing about this to have an opinion.
MKUltra - Is not a "conspiracy theory" but a fact of history. I suspect such research has continued "off the record", not because I have any concrete facts that I've looked into (I haven't), but to ease the public's discomfort over it and to continue valuable (to entities like the CIA and others) research. Note: "I suspect" doesn't mean "I know"
Agenda 21 - I have read a little, but don't know enough about this to have an opinion either way.
How refreshing to have someone with their head screwed on right...
You are obviously thoughtful, intelligent, and have actually done some research.
Hope to hear more form you...
I know this kind of a thing can be hard to accept, being that there we're kids involved and all. People have to realize that a false flag attack is structured in such a way to make sure asking questions would be insensitive. People have the false impression that if you ask questions about obvious evidence, that you are somehow insulting the memory of those who we're lost. That's why false flag attacks usually have a hero story to go along with them. That way if you dare say anything, someone will end up punching you in the face screaming "don't you dare insult these heroes". Now if anyone on here is interested in actual evidence instead of caving to their feelings then please keep reading. There are a few different aspects of this case that fall right in line with a common false flag event:
1. Manufactured confusion - Obviously every single news agency has a completely different version of the story. One reporter says she spoke with the school nurse on the street (even though the nurse was in the school), another news source says the shooter was Ryan Lanza, and that his little brother was in custody for questioning. Nobody can tell us exactly what guns we're used and where they we're. Basically overall the whole thing is confusing, this makes the common viewer give up on getting the truth for themselves. Instead the common viewer subconsciously feels that maybe they just failed to keep up with the news properly, so they get into a mode where they assume the news will "catch them up", at this point they will accept anything.
2. Heroes - Once again we have heroes, even though every time I hear about a shooting in Camden, NJ, which is literally all the time, I can't remember the last time I heard of any heroes. The hero aspect like I said puts a thick shield over the conspiracy, because most people will rebuke you for even questioning it.
Now a few weeks ago, I was really confused as to why the news stations could not get their stories straight. So I decided to take things right to the horses mouth, and that horse is Lt. Paul Vance from CT State Police. I started communicating with him through email asking about the shooting. At first he was pretty cooperative, he did give me some details, but not much. He confirmed that the weapon in the trunk was a shotgun, he said the shooter killed himself with a handgun and that the victims we're killed by the AR-15. I then put up some of the transcript from the police radio communications where officers we're chasing down and apprehending additional suspects. At this point I have not narrowed down the exact number, but it is believed to be almost 6-7 suspects either apprehended or chased by police. After I put up that transcript and asked exactly where the handguns and AR-15 we're found, he ended the conversation. The reason why he ended the conversation is that he understands for one that he has the right to remain silent, and he also understands that any email from his office can be used against him in court. So instead of lying he simply chose to not say anything at all.
Moving forward, I started following a lead about alleged actors and stumbled onto a large collection of photos of the Greenberg family. I was able to recover and store over 1000 photos of this family and used them for analysis. I started with the Phelps family from Sandy Hook. It took only a couple of seconds to see that the Phelps are not who they say they are, they are Jennifer and Nick Greenberg. From that point I continued to look through the photos and noticed that one of their daughters was really familiar. Then I established another connection between Christina Taylor Green, who was an alleged victim of the 2011 shooting in Tuscon, AZ. I compared her photo to many Greenberg family photos and once again a dead match.
At this point I have brought a few experts into this through my company, because at this point I feel there is enough to launch an official investigation.
Here are the Phelps, as interviewed on CNN:
Here are a few images of the Greenbergs:
Those are just a few to get started, the Phelps are obviously the Greenbergs.
Christina Taylor Green (victim from 2011 Tuscon shooting):
As you can see, she is alive and well:
..and that is just the beginning. There are WAY more leads that are being followed from the Greenberg photo collection.
This photo of the Parker family was altered, this was confirmed by my photographer/graphic designer:
Download the above image and load it into your favorite image editor. Zoom in around Emilie Parker's head (girl to the far right). You will notice no strands of hair come off her head, also you can see smearing around her head. Her knee is cut off on the bottom right of the photo. There is no shadow on her arm as it's supposed to be somewhat behind her fathers arm.
All I want to speak to on the content is about Emilie Parker's pic. The photo is a professional family photo. The photographer likely did the Photoshopping himself to improve the look of the picture (stray hairs on her head). The shadow issue is not even an issue since the photographer likely had lighting from multiple directions. Look at her face, and you see her nose casts shadow on her right cheek, meaning the light source is coming from her left. Which would illuminate her arm even though is is behind her dad's because it is still to the left of his arm and therefore in the light coming from her left.
It means something's awry. What that is exactly, is still up in the air at this point. Drawing the conclusion that she never existed is not what I'm doing. What I am saying is that photo-shopping, such as is clear below, indicates a lack of photos, or at least, a lack of photos when the news first came out. That could mean lots of things.
Here's the same photo that outlines the problem on the photo:
Newtown - Obviously I doubt the official story of this event for multiple reasons
As a woman, a regular user of photoshop, and an artist who constantly studies human anatomy from both medical text books and instructions on human proportions and drawing the skeleton, I feel qualified to say that whoever originally drew these conclusions from this photo is an idiot of startling proportions.
I happen to be sitting in almost that exact pose right now, and I assure you it is possible. What you think is the continuation of her leg is actually her sweater bunched up over her hip. There's no cut away on her skirt, merely a highlight, and her finger is perfectly normal--you are mistaking a bit of shadow under her finger for a continuation of the finger itself.
Of course the rest of this thread is complete nonsense as well, but as this is actually one of my few areas of expertise, I thought I'd weigh in.
A professional photographer and graphic designer commented on this. There are multiple problems with the picture that indicate editing. Zoom in on the bottom right, you can see her knee is cut off, zoom in and it looks like part of the grass was clone stamped in a square shape. The blades of grass going over her fathers knee are cut right off as well. The edges around the girl are not consistent with the rest of the photo. There are no loose strands of hair around her head, and the edges are clearly blurred. There is no reason for a professional photographer to take a family portrait, then perform these edits which actually make the picture look worse. If this was really a professional photo, I certainly hope they got their money back.
MAGIC BULLET
How is the world could anyone at all believe in a bullet that changes direction in air? So who are the real conspiracy theorists? In my mind, the mainstream media are the conspiracy nuts, their the ones falling all over each other and can't even get a single fact straight!
It also has nothing to do with the current conspiracy you're hawking.
For those who say we can just trust what the government tells us, I then ask should I trust in the magic bullet
I How do we even know that Adam Lanza was the shooter when a news source put this out:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?