• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Return of My Ex Nihilo Challenge

Shemjaza

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2006
6,469
4,008
47
✟1,116,864.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Greens
Did you watch it?

Those who understood clapped.
I did watch it.

Those who already share the faith clapped.

I'm unconvinced because it assumes the existence of God's attributes as a justification for his existence... it isn't logically sound.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,726
52,530
Guam
✟5,133,136.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I'm unconvinced because it assumes the existence of God's attributes as a justification for his existence...

Um ... he was answering the question as to where God came from?

So it was okay for the person asking Ken to assume God exists, but Mr Hovind can't answer accordingly?

The man asking the question is assuming God is confined within His creation.

Kent is using what you call "unsound logic" to show God would have to be outside of His creation.

And the audience clapped -- as did I.
 
Upvote 0

Shemjaza

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2006
6,469
4,008
47
✟1,116,864.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Greens

It's unsound logic because the response to how does a spiritual God create the Universe is to say that he can because he's God with God's appropriate attributes... it's not an explanation, it's a description.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,726
52,530
Guam
✟5,133,136.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
It's unsound logic because the response to how does a spiritual God create the Universe is to say that he can because he's God with God's appropriate attributes... it's not an explanation, it's a description.

Again ... did you watch the video?

You said you did, but ... well ...

There was no question about how God created the universe.

The question was where God came from.
 
Upvote 0

Akita Suggagaki

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2018
10,126
7,240
70
Midwest
✟370,233.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I did watch it.

Those who already share the faith clapped.

I'm unconvinced because it assumes the existence of God's attributes as a justification for his existence... it isn't logically sound.
Unconvinced of what? That God exists outside of time and space?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,726
52,530
Guam
✟5,133,136.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
But he does not support ex nihilo. Time, matter and space have their origin in God.

From AI Overview:

The belief that time, space, and matter originate from God is often associated with the concept of creationism and is a core tenet of theistic religions, including Christianity and Islam. It posits that God, as a transcendent being, is the ultimate source and sustainer of the universe, bringing everything into existence through an act of creation.

So far it agrees with you.

But then it goes on to say ...

Here's a more detailed explanation:

Creationism:

This belief system asserts that the universe and all life were created by God, often described as "ex nihilo" (out of nothing), rather than evolving from pre-existing matter.
 
Upvote 0

Akita Suggagaki

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2018
10,126
7,240
70
Midwest
✟370,233.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
We seem to have either have creatio ex nihilo or creatio ex materia.

But I actually opt for a 3rd possibility eminationism. In the 3rd century it was rejected by most Jews, Christians, and Muslims. But we have come a long way in understanding the universe since then. It seem to me that eminationism is the only way to reconcile immanence and transcendence. It is basically a version of process theology which deserves a more careful consideration. Creation doe snot come from nothing. It comes from God.
 
Upvote 0

Shemjaza

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2006
6,469
4,008
47
✟1,116,864.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Greens
Again ... did you watch the video?

You said you did, but ... well ...

There was no question about how God created the universe.

The question was where God came from.

And the answer is simply the timelessness trait... while ascribing time dependent activities like "creating".

It's a description of a trait that is labelled as necessary, then special pleading it's possibility.

Unconvinced of what? That God exists outside of time and space?

Of anything. A unsound argument is as useless as a demonstration of a true thing as it is of a false one.

If I claim the day's sky is blue because my coffee cup is blue, it's still an unsound argument despite the conclusion being correct.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,726
52,530
Guam
✟5,133,136.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
And the answer is simply the timelessness trait... while ascribing time dependent activities like "creating".

It's a description of a trait that is labelled as necessary, then special pleading it's possibility.

This is what happens, folks, when our education system truncates God out of the picture.

It leaves in its wake people who can't understand even basic theology.
 
Upvote 0

sjastro

Newbie
May 14, 2014
5,759
4,695
✟348,837.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

I thought creationists might have done better instead of using a convicted criminal to make the case for creationism.


Of course I might be engaging in a terrible strawman attack against this individual who appears to be on a money making exercise out of creationism rather than a genuine crusader in spreading the word.


According to the science nothing is created Ex Nihilio.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,726
52,530
Guam
✟5,133,136.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I thought creationists might have done better instead of using a convicted criminal to make the case for creationism.

Mr Hovind was rightfully applauded by the audience.

Of course I might be engaging in a terrible strawman attack against this individual who appears to be on a money making exercise out of creationism rather than a genuine crusader in spreading the word.

Mr Hovind was rightfully applauded by the audience.

According to the science nothing is created Ex Nihilio.

That's why I said in my OP:

"Here's my question:
What physical evidence would convince you this happened?
I submit there isn't any."

Put simply: science can take a hike.
 
Upvote 0