this came on my mind last night at work.
this thread isn't really meant to be a discussion on if it happened or not, and i hope that is kept in mind.
i was just thinking about it last night, and thinking of the details described in the Gospels, and some things aren't lining up...quo say.
all the resurrections in the Bible show a person being raised from the dead, and they return to us a human being just as we are (at least that seems to be easily assumed by the lack of literature of the after body effects after the resurrection each person either had or didn't have.)
but Jesus was different. the Gospels tell us that Jesus rose from the grave, and was a human being. as recorded, Thomas touched the wounds so he could believe it was actually Christ. but then Jesus disappeared, or in other words, appeared to be an apparition.
so this leaves me wandering what the true definition of Christ's resurrection really is according to the Bible. we are told that Christ rose from the dead, and it was a literal/real resurrection.
i'm not trying to prove the resurrection wrong, but i would imagine Christ's resurrection would be the same as the other resurrections in the Bible, for it to be 100 percent literal and according to scriptures, it wasn't as the other described resurrections.
so i just wander what people's thoughts are on this.
this thread isn't really meant to be a discussion on if it happened or not, and i hope that is kept in mind.
i was just thinking about it last night, and thinking of the details described in the Gospels, and some things aren't lining up...quo say.
all the resurrections in the Bible show a person being raised from the dead, and they return to us a human being just as we are (at least that seems to be easily assumed by the lack of literature of the after body effects after the resurrection each person either had or didn't have.)
but Jesus was different. the Gospels tell us that Jesus rose from the grave, and was a human being. as recorded, Thomas touched the wounds so he could believe it was actually Christ. but then Jesus disappeared, or in other words, appeared to be an apparition.
so this leaves me wandering what the true definition of Christ's resurrection really is according to the Bible. we are told that Christ rose from the dead, and it was a literal/real resurrection.
i'm not trying to prove the resurrection wrong, but i would imagine Christ's resurrection would be the same as the other resurrections in the Bible, for it to be 100 percent literal and according to scriptures, it wasn't as the other described resurrections.
so i just wander what people's thoughts are on this.