Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If you are not a universalist, why are you posting in this thread?
Yes there are verses that support it. And there are verses that seem to go against it. I lean toward the former.
You come out of my post with 'that' for an understanding and basis for your 'no comment' of a 'comment' on it??????If you are not a universalist, why are you posting in this thread?
Yes there are verses that support it. And there are verses that seem to go against it. I lean toward the former.
But, as a UR/UNI believer since the mid 70's I, and hopefully now you, both know that all His judgements and punishments serve 'truly eternal' purposes. Something that Orthodoxy does not know.
I'm glad I have a personal relationship with God, instead of just a relationship with a book that can't be trusted. (the Bible)As I said earlier Steve, you again aren't even posting to 'understand' anything. You are simply proving how indoctrinated you are, with all your posts ARGUING how we're wrong. It is boring me, because I have studied from your position, because it was mine. It is no longer.
I understand that having eternal life does not make us eternal, if that's what you mean. But I suppose that a true Universalist can't believe that they have eternal life, only "age-during" life. Then what?Yes, actual definition, but one that suits you. Not all Christians and/or scholars agree with that definition. I think, personally, that the Greek word is more nuanced than its English translation/transliteration. Since you do not comment on the rest of post, do you then not disagree with it?
Not much of a platform for discussion when people choose their own definitions. Sounds more like a slippery slope.Not all Christians and/or scholars agree with that definition.
I agree. All three seem to be supported. Which makes no sense.The Christian pastor who first really introduced me to UR stated that, as he saw it I guess, the Bible seems to teach all three, damnationism, annihilationism and universal reconciliation.
I understand that having eternal life does not make us eternal, if that's what you mean. But I suppose that a true Universalist can't believe that they have eternal life, only "age-during" life. Then what?
Anyway, I hope you guys are right. But... ???
Not much of a platform for discussion when people choose their own definitions. Sounds more like a slippery slope.
I agree. All three seem to be supported. Which makes no sense.
In the Greek language there exists tenses that are not used or available in English, at least without the use of extra vocabulary to explain what was truly meant. John 3:16, the favorite Biblical verse placed on highway billboards, or written on posters at football games, apparently express a verbal “tense” not used in the English language.
That tense is referred to as the continuous present tense. It can be constructed in English using words that accompany the verb. However, there is no single tense that can be assigned to the verb that makes it present continuous. Common English language sentences in different tenses may read like these:
Present Tense: Billy is swimming..
Past Tense: Billy swam.
Future Tense: Billy will swim tomorrow.
Present Continuous Tense (In English): Billy has been swimming all day.
Notice how in English the continuous present tense can be formed by using an auxillary verb plus a past participle prior to the verb (swimming). This is not necessary in Greek, since there’s an actual tense for the verb itself that denotes something happening now and ongoing.
The best translation of John 3:16 would read more like the following:
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever “continues or goes on believing” in him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. Whoever “continues believing” in him is not condemned, but whoever does not “continue believing” stands condemned already because they have not “continued believing” in the name of God’s one and only Son.
Easy believism
The idea that salvation is simply a one time, one-and-done event that doesn’t result or show itself in any real manifested way. “Come to this alter, say this prayer, and you’re saved”.
Yes, too bad we can't trust it. (the Bible)Worry not, for First Corinthians 15 tells us that the Son will, when Death has been defeated, turn His kingdom over to the Father, Who will then be All in all. In another place, we are told that of His kingdom there will be no end, so there is your answer. The Bible is sketchy in places, but even the sketch is comforting...
Yes, too bad we can't trust it. (the Bible)
Thanks brother. Now, who is going to teach WRANGLER that he is going to make all the Eternal Hellers think that all UR/UNI believers believe God doesn't punish sin at all, even when scripture plainly says he does? And He 'does so' for the same reason for both groups. He does the same for those who are being saved in this age according to 'HIS WILL', as he does for those in the next age, according to 'HIS WILL'. The purgative "consuming fire" which "God is", will cleanse all his creation, when sin and evil has fulfilled His omniscient reason for allowing every bit of it to begin with.Dear Wrangler: Hillsage has been on this thread posting from the very beginning. I assure you he believes in the Restitution of all things!
The Father of all fathers punishes with one objective ONLY: change & transformation.
Isn't that the point? (between the lines)Seriously...?
Thanks brother. Now, who is going to teach WRANGLER that he is going to make all the Eternal Hellers think that all UR/UNI believers believe God doesn't punish sin at all, even when scripture plainly says he does? And He 'does so' for the same reason for both groups. He does the same for those who are being saved in this age according to 'HIS WILL', as he does for those in the next age, according to 'HIS WILL'. The purgative "consuming fire" which "God is", will cleanse all his creation, when sin and evil has fulfilled His omniscient reason for allowing every bit of it to begin with.
Would "prepared" be the same as created? What exactly is "eternal fire"?1. There is no mention of Hell in God’s Creation of the Cosmos - therefore, Hell is apperently uncreated by God or anyone else.
Isn't this contrary to Universalism?2. In the first chapter of Genesis, it is stated six times that God saw that what He had made was good, excluding Hell as being possible, as the Creation could not have been wholly good had Hell been in existence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?