rmwilliamsll
avid reader
yes, thank you for posting the link, i wrote this in my blog this morning concerning it.
it really is not a particular bill of issues to handle in the church but rather a call to arms. sadly so, it is better for brothers to discuss things then to fight, the takehome message of the unCivil War. name calling doesn't help, having a high value for unity in the midst of diversity helps hold things together until a consensus emerges. the final and serious message for me on issues like this and J.Morecraft is that Presbyterians like to argue theology and we often don't do it very graciously nor brotherly. "and they shall know us by our love" is more than a line in a song for me.
i prize the unity and peace of the church, i find that the problem of denominationalism is after the problem of evil, the most cogent argument an agnostic has for not believing, i am shy of giving him more ammunition then he already has. Schism is a sin, disrupting the unity of the body of Christ is not a light thing to do, perhaps our incessant debate is, like my wife insists, just a little bit juvenile. i don't know. It certainly seems like the attraction and recruitment of loudly arguing people is high into the conservative Presbyterian denominations.
maybe basic personality traits have something to do with the whole situation. i don't know.
but it does sadden me for my church. and i am sure it saddens our common Lord.
confirms the importance of the CED issue in the church. however the article is basically a slippery slope argument that i have referred to as the 900 lb gorilla in the back of the room, in HAP.(the history of american presbyterian SS class)essay on PCA divisions at: http://www.banneroftruth.org/pages/articles/article_detail.php?179
The old neo-orthodox methodology of Biblical interpretation appeals to us. One result, leaders offer a 'take your choice from the bag of views' of Biblical creation because we in our culture have already been infected to academic compromise by public education's prophets of evolution. We were unwilling to accept simply what God says in His Word though many scientists did and have found their scientific affirmations in its light. light.
it really is not a particular bill of issues to handle in the church but rather a call to arms. sadly so, it is better for brothers to discuss things then to fight, the takehome message of the unCivil War. name calling doesn't help, having a high value for unity in the midst of diversity helps hold things together until a consensus emerges. the final and serious message for me on issues like this and J.Morecraft is that Presbyterians like to argue theology and we often don't do it very graciously nor brotherly. "and they shall know us by our love" is more than a line in a song for me.
i prize the unity and peace of the church, i find that the problem of denominationalism is after the problem of evil, the most cogent argument an agnostic has for not believing, i am shy of giving him more ammunition then he already has. Schism is a sin, disrupting the unity of the body of Christ is not a light thing to do, perhaps our incessant debate is, like my wife insists, just a little bit juvenile. i don't know. It certainly seems like the attraction and recruitment of loudly arguing people is high into the conservative Presbyterian denominations.
maybe basic personality traits have something to do with the whole situation. i don't know.
but it does sadden me for my church. and i am sure it saddens our common Lord.
Upvote
0