- Oct 4, 2016
- 7,236
- 7,313
- 56
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Oriental Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Single
I got a lot of project ideas on stuff I that I think is important, than many people don't either know about, appreciate etc.
I really want to do a series on the history of the Creeds, and why the stuff in them matters.
Was looking at that last night.
I got some inspiration of an old article explaining how each item in the Apostles Creed is a refutation of the basic tenets of the various Gnostic heretical schools. Would sort of like to to do that with Arianism etc. Not to mention, the background development of the creeds is really important as far as how and why they came into being. So last night, I was up and reading up on "The Old Roman Creed", and Tertullian's "Rule of Faith" that preceded it.
But I think this is going to take some time if I really want to do it right as far as thorough job goes. (I do sometimes see where audience interest is not that great where such ambitions get scaled back).
But Right now I have been thinking about a project that had an initial title like, "Why being Scriptural" is not enough. The topic came from watching a nondenominational Charismatic lady plug basing your teaching/beliefs "on scripture". This is good, it will keep you from at least the really major heresy problems like being a full blown Gnostic, or New Ager, of doing the Deeds of the Nicolaitans etc. but it is not enough, it is not the same thing as following the Received Faith / Rule of Faith, tradition of the Apostles (Paradosis) etc. It is not a synonym for orthodox in the small or big o sense of the word.
Right now thinking of some separate video or blog themes / keynotes
(under construction)
1) Theology of the Sound Bite
I have met and watched many many people base their theology on what I have named "The Theology of the Sound bite". Their entire teaching approach is based on what is snappy, dramatic, pithy and quotable, especially "What preaches well".
A) There are lots of problems with this = This approach often does not mesh well with what the early Christians actually taught and believed. e.g. - Snake handling Pentecostals in certain regions of the south.
B) Heresies related to Christ and the Trinity often "preach well", I'm talking about Arianism, Modalism etc.
C) Lots of people do not appreciate the supernatural aspects of having Faith in God (I'm talking about things like realizing that young children have a spiritual life etc. and can believers in spite of not having the intellect of an adult or adolescent. This is important when it comes to issues like baptism, and some people being against babies and young children being baptized, which if you look in both the Bible and in Christian history seems like it happened, e.g. the testimony of people like Polycarp telling how long "they served the Lord".
I really want to do a series on the history of the Creeds, and why the stuff in them matters.
Was looking at that last night.
I got some inspiration of an old article explaining how each item in the Apostles Creed is a refutation of the basic tenets of the various Gnostic heretical schools. Would sort of like to to do that with Arianism etc. Not to mention, the background development of the creeds is really important as far as how and why they came into being. So last night, I was up and reading up on "The Old Roman Creed", and Tertullian's "Rule of Faith" that preceded it.
But I think this is going to take some time if I really want to do it right as far as thorough job goes. (I do sometimes see where audience interest is not that great where such ambitions get scaled back).
But Right now I have been thinking about a project that had an initial title like, "Why being Scriptural" is not enough. The topic came from watching a nondenominational Charismatic lady plug basing your teaching/beliefs "on scripture". This is good, it will keep you from at least the really major heresy problems like being a full blown Gnostic, or New Ager, of doing the Deeds of the Nicolaitans etc. but it is not enough, it is not the same thing as following the Received Faith / Rule of Faith, tradition of the Apostles (Paradosis) etc. It is not a synonym for orthodox in the small or big o sense of the word.
Right now thinking of some separate video or blog themes / keynotes
(under construction)
1) Theology of the Sound Bite
I have met and watched many many people base their theology on what I have named "The Theology of the Sound bite". Their entire teaching approach is based on what is snappy, dramatic, pithy and quotable, especially "What preaches well".
A) There are lots of problems with this = This approach often does not mesh well with what the early Christians actually taught and believed. e.g. - Snake handling Pentecostals in certain regions of the south.
B) Heresies related to Christ and the Trinity often "preach well", I'm talking about Arianism, Modalism etc.
C) Lots of people do not appreciate the supernatural aspects of having Faith in God (I'm talking about things like realizing that young children have a spiritual life etc. and can believers in spite of not having the intellect of an adult or adolescent. This is important when it comes to issues like baptism, and some people being against babies and young children being baptized, which if you look in both the Bible and in Christian history seems like it happened, e.g. the testimony of people like Polycarp telling how long "they served the Lord".
Last edited: