Like I said, I'm not defending either one, but the issue NOW is spending is out of control and the feds need to stop spending it. They haven't even done a budget in 3 years! It's really inexcusable.but if those extra people on unemployment and such are those that have fallen into poverty, not the eligibility requirements being lowered. THen its a good thing we have a safety net or the economic crash could have triggered another depression. It all rolls down hill. If you lose your job and theres no unemployment. You use up your parents/families disposable income. So they as well as you are able to buy less. creating a vicious circle.
That is the total amount the government spent. You can't hold Obama responsible for the money spent in Iraq during his term. You can't count the financial bail out against him either, bush worked the deal it just fell to the new pres. to sign it. Then theres the money lost to the medicare part D that we are still paying for ( that's where the government can't negotiate the price with pharmaceutical companies). All of these things would have counted against the debt after bush left office. Call me crazy, but these things were the major driver of the debt. I would just like to see the real math.
I remember when Obama said he would bring the troops home within 6 months of his 1st election, and he sent more troops. He is the commander and chief, he is responsible for to either send more troops or bring them home.
Another thing to consider is that when we went to war with Bush, the dems also voted to go to war. This was not all on Bush's shoulders. They had come here and killed 1,000's of people.
Both Bush and Obama are horrible Presidents, the worst this country has ever seen.
Upvote
0