• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The Purpose of Progressive Adventist?

RC_NewProtestants

Senior Veteran
May 2, 2006
2,766
63
Washington State
Visit site
✟25,750.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I see your point, but traditionals are intrinsic to our meaning. They are resisting progressives for a reason. There is a foundation to protect, and I don't mean just the 28. That's a minor part of our foundation. Without our foundation, there's nothing to build on. How many times do progressives get all charismatic about changing the church and then take off. Without traditionals, any organization is in trouble. Without progressives, any organization will eventually die. This could be a good marriage! If we get divorced, we'll just want to get remarried!
No traditionals are not intrinsic to our meaning. We were a church that started by going against traditions. Clearly our church founders were able to build upon the Christian foundation yet they were not bound by those traditions as foundations. There is always something to build on but that is only a starting point not the end point. For many traditionals it is the end point thus they reject progressive ideas simply because they are not their traditional ideas.

People can have a foundation and still examine the ideas that make up the foundation and if they don't work they should be removed rather then entrenched. Just as with any other denominational split if there ever is a split neither side will want to remarry.
 
Upvote 0

Mankin

A Strange Mixture of Random Components.
Site Supporter
Apr 28, 2007
8,660
174
In the Norse Lands
✟77,451.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
I see your point, but traditionals are intrinsic to our meaning. They are resisting progressives for a reason. There is a foundation to protect, and I don't mean just the 28. That's a minor part of our foundation. Without our foundation, there's nothing to build on. How many times do progressives get all charismatic about changing the church and then take off. Without traditionals, any organization is in trouble. Without progressives, any organization will eventually die. This could be a good marriage! If we get divorced, we'll just want to get remarried!

Excellent! Somebody tell me there's a price for Avonia.:clap:
 
Upvote 0

Mankin

A Strange Mixture of Random Components.
Site Supporter
Apr 28, 2007
8,660
174
In the Norse Lands
✟77,451.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
I could list a whole variety of episodes from history where traditionlism ruined a nation. I could also list parts where progression ruined a nation(French Revolution) Maybe I should start a thread about it.:p
 
Upvote 0

Avonia

Just look through the telescope . . .
Dec 13, 2007
1,345
36
✟24,313.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
In Relationship
Clearly our church founders were able to build upon the Christian foundation

Yes, the tradition at that point . . .
We were a church that started by going against traditions.

To a Hindu, the new version looks nearly identical to the old . . .
yet they were not bound by those traditions as foundations.

Yes . . . progression . . .
For many traditionals it is the end point thus they reject progressive ideas simply because they are not their traditional ideas.

Agreed.
Just as with any other denominational split if there ever is a split neither side will want to remarry.

Not to the SAME person RC! A new marriage!
 
Upvote 0

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,284
525
✟574,533.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Red that's your second baseball reference. For your first one, I thought you were listing ADVENTIST heroes, not baseball heroes! I felt completely out of touch since I knew NONE of them! Whew . . . close call.

Our Florida Marlins baseball team won the World Series in 1997, then because of money/contracts they traded away the heart of our team, again, and again, and again etc........:(
 
Upvote 0