Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
How do know that what you do find appealing isn't a god's request? In other words, don't you think if a god wanted you to do something, he would make it appeal to you? Is there not something (alleviating suffering) that is universally appealing?As far as rewards for following a god's requests go...it's not too appealing.
Thanks for your response!The idea of God and an afterlife is absurd. As we expand our awareness through "spiritual development", it becomes less absurd.. but still absurd. This isn't by accident.
I believe the answer to your question of why this physical reality exists is for the purpose of transforming from ignorance and limitation to self actualization through exercising faith. I don't think it's important for you or anyone else to agree with me on that, though.
That's right. I wasn't sure if this thread was only meant for Christians or not, but I responded anyway.Thanks for your response!
If I agree or not would be the second step. First I need to understand.
Am I correct in assuming from your first paragraph that you don´t adhere to Christian theology, or more precisely: that you don´t believe in a personal creator God?
Yes, it was meant to be about possible motives of a personal creator God.That's right. I wasn't sure if this thread was only meant for Christians or not, but I responded anyway.
Yes, that seems to be the idea. I, however, wasn´t asking for a "but maybe the idea is correct", but for an explanation how it could possibly make sense.Maybe one is somehow unfit for the spiritual realm until they can "properly" react to the physical realm.
Like...when you move to a lonely island forever, you should first make sure you can safely drive a formula1 racing car?Maybe as in training, you demonstrate that you can deal with things even though you will not really be expected to deal with them.
Yes, that seems to be the idea. I, however, wasn´t asking for a "but maybe the idea is correct", but for an explanation how it could possibly make sense.
Like...when you move to a lonely island forever, you should first make sure you can safely drive a formula1 racing car?
Yeah, it was but an analogy, you know.No, that doesn't demonstrate any particular kind of character, just a certain skill.
Well, I can see how this is meant to show that and how your "spiritual" skills/character/whatever can help you deal with worldly problems, once you are living in a physical world.I remember the old "King Fu" TV show where the character has to snatch the pebble from his master's hand, and has to pick up a burning hot cauldron with bare wrists. I don't think Bhuddist monks ever do that stuff in the regular course of living, but it demonstrated a certain kind and level of character.
Maybe there is something like temptation there, so character is required. Or maybe it isn't required but it's desirable to have it anyway. Some people make art objects out of gold, a higher quality substance than is necessary for an object. Or maybe the state of being in Heaven is just the "natural" result of having had a certain character here.Am I right in concluding that - according to your line of reasoning - life in the spiritual realm doesn´t/can´t show whether you have that "character", and that this "character" isn´t a requirement for living in the spiritual realm?
What kind of temptation are you thinking of here?Maybe there is something like temptation there, so character is required.
Can you give an explanatory example?Or maybe it isn't required but it's desirable to have it anyway.
Yeah, I know. A lot of people do a lot of things once they are in the physical realm. There´s no doubt we even create artificial problems just for the sake of it (think: games). The whole learning/improving/growing thing makes a lot of sense - within the physical realm (and we often emulate or even try to be better than immediately necessary, in order to be prepared for even higher challenges within this realm). I do understand that.Some people make art objects out of gold, a higher quality substance than is necessary for an object.
Could you explain what you mean by "natural", here? Because none of the definitions I am aware of seems to be applicable.Or maybe the state of being in Heaven is just the "natural" result of having had a certain character here.
What kind of temptation are you thinking of here?
Can you give an explanatory example?
Desirable from whose perspective, and for which reason?
Yeah, I know. A lot of people do a lot of things once they are in the physical realm. There´s no doubt we even create artificial problems just for the sake of it (think: games). The whole learning/improving/growing thing makes a lot of sense - within the physical realm (and we often emulate or even try to be better than immediately necessary, in order to be prepared for even higher challenges within this realm). I do understand that.
My question, however, is a different one: Why create an entire realm with conditions that are totally unlike the conditions in the realm you meant to train for?
Could you explain what you mean by "natural", here? Because none of the definitions I am aware of seems to be applicable.
I am also wondering how God got to Heaven, then, and what happens to children who die early and didn´t have this required "natural" training.
How do know that what you do find appealing isn't a god's request? In other words, don't you think if a god wanted you to do something, he would make it appeal to you? Is there not something (alleviating suffering) that is universally appealing?
Yes, it was meant to be about possible motives of a personal creator God.
I will happily exchange our ideas of spirituality with you in another thread, though.
The question in short:
Why would a non-material/non-physical (entirely "spiritual") being create a material/physical world when the actual goal (that which it is all about) is again a "spiritual" state of affairs?
Or IOW: why create a world exclusively for beings to prove that they are "not of this world"?
The OP is part of a larger question. Which is why would a transcendent, omniscient, inconceivably superior and perfect entity do anything at all?
Ok. Tell me more about it. Will we digest, will we have pain, will we be vulnerable, will we suffer, can we be killed, will we age, will there be gravity and all the natural laws...or what does "physical" mean in this statement?According to Christian theology, the end goal of creation is entirely physical. God's people will live in physical bodies in this (renewed) physical world and worship a physical God (Jesus Christ). We will do work, dance, hug, sing, eat, drink, run, etc...
It´s interesting, though, that he uses a word that can also mean "world", for this.The NT expression "not of this world" is used exclusively by John. John's word for "world" is the Greek κόσμος and almost always means "unbelieving society of men". "The world" for John is those who do not believe. The disciples are not "of the world". John never means by this expression that we are destined to live in a non-physical existence.
According to Christian theology, the end goal of creation is entirely physical. God's people will live in physical bodies in this (renewed) physical world and worship a physical God (Jesus Christ). We will do work, dance, hug, sing, eat, drink, run, etc...
The idea that the Bible presents an "entirely" spiritual picture of the age to come is mistaken.
The NT expression "not of this world" is used exclusively by John. John's word for "world" is the Greek κόσμος and almost always means "unbelieving society of men". "The world" for John is those who do not believe. The disciples are not "of the world". John never means by this expression that we are destined to live in a non-physical existence.
Yes, words like "supernatural", "spiritual" are almost always used as antagonists to "physical, natural, material" - by Christians. Many of their points depend on them being antagonists.I believe your question contain a incorrect pre-supposition. And, to be fair to you, Christians themselves are probably responsible for this. As at least one other poster has pointed, the Biblical narrative does not end up in a "non-physical" state. I am convinced that the Scriptures teach that God is going to restore, redeem, and otherwise "perfect" this very physical world.
In this respect, there is a HUGE misunderstanding that trips up many, probably most, Christians - they read "spiritual" as necessarily denoting non-physical.
Ok. As soon as I find the time, I will create a similar thread for those who believe that the afterlife is physical.Please read that again because it is very important. Writers like Paul use the term "spiritual" to denote "redeemed" (or some similar concept), not immaterial or non-physical. Hence, in 1 Corinthians 15 Paul uses the adjective "spiritual" to describe a physical object - the human body.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?