- Nov 21, 2008
- 53,091
- 11,777
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
Are you asking them why they are not born speaking the ancient form of Hebrew?? Do you speak it?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why would you dilute the literal text by using a translation?
Ummmmmm, I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but the seventieth week is complete,
That's not what the angle instructed (Ref. 12:4 & 9), and it might be perilous to disobey an angel.
Thanks,
DaDad
Please do a word search on mashiyach (H4899).
CEV:
9.25 the Chosen Leader: Or “a chosen leader.” In Hebrew the word “chosen” means “to pour oil (on someone’s head).” In Old Testament times it was the custom to pour oil on a person’s head when that person was chosen to be a priest or a king
... or be content in the commentator's error.
Thanks,
DaDad
Ummmmmm, yes it is! GOD provided a sequence which contradicts the commentators and conforms to world history (this is to say that there is no "Revived Roman Empire -- 4a/4b). But if you like the commentators, then please be content.... It is not an "it is written", ...
Ummmmm, no. Preterism is false, -- Scripture and History are TRUE. Follow Scripture and History, it's a lot of work, but they are both TRUE, and they agree with each other, just like GOD intended.No sir. That is PRETEARISM and it is not Biblical a=and neither is it logical or historicaly true.
Nope. Daniel wrote that he perceived (biyn -- Ref. 1 Kings 3, simple wisdom -shama vs Solomon wisdom - biyn) the Books, which turns out to the be Book of Psalms.
That's not correct:... ALL the prophets had TWO visions in mind. One was THEIR time and the other was way on down the road of time. ...
That cannot be correct for several scriptural reasons,
[1] the 70 weeks (490 years) is simply a subsection of the greater 2,300, as per (Daniel 9:23,24, "the vision", "determined"), which would mean, that after the 490 years, 1810 years remain to be accounted for (Daniel 8:13,14,26; Revelation 9:15, 14:6-7, etc)
[2] Jesus fulfilled the requirements in Daniel 9:24, "to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness":
Everlasting righteousness began with Jesus.
Jesus/Michael stood up in AD 34 [Acts 7:55-56 KJB], the end of the 70 weeks, in Daniel 9, and thus the close of the probation of the Jews as a nation, the sanhedrin, having rejected the Head and the body. He will so stand again [Daniel 12:1; Luke 13:25; Revelation 22:11 KJB, etc]
AD 27 + 3 1/2 = AD 31; crucifixion. The first of the final week of the 70 weeks, as Jesus told Peter [Matthew 18:22 KJB]
AD 31 + 3 1/2 = AD 34; Stephen martyred. End of the 70 weeks, as we see in Hebrews 2:3 KJB
Parallels [the short version, two rainbows]:
Jesus in AD 27 Anointed with the Holy Ghost, ministry 3 1/2 years, miracles, taken captive AD 31, rejected by the sanhedrin, condemned to death, dies outside the city
.
Please do a word search on mashiyach (H4899).
CEV:
9.25 the Chosen Leader: Or “a chosen leader.” In Hebrew the word “chosen” means “to pour oil (on someone’s head).” In Old Testament times it was the custom to pour oil on a person’s head when that person was chosen to be a priest or a king
... or be content in the commentator's error.
Thanks,
DaDad
That's not correct:
10:13 The prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me twenty-one days; but Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, so I left him there with the prince of the kingdom of Persiaa]">[a] 14 and came to make you understand what is to befall your people in the latter days. For the vision is for days yet to come.”
12:4 But you, Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, until the time of the end. Many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase.”
9 He said, “Go your way, Daniel, for the words are shut up and sealed until the time of the end.
Don't believe everything you're told!
DaDad
If my wife can make a shopping list (chrolonogical - Intelligent Design), and then rewrite it according to the aisles of the store (Intelligent Design); and then when GOD does the same, HIS critics assert that GOD didn't use Intelligent Design for HIS second sequence order, -- then obviously GOD's not very smart, per his critics.you said...….
MOST of us are -- Smarter than GOD!
Please tell me that you were being sarcastic or fooling us.
Then you agree with my favorite aunt when she used to tease: My mind's made up, don't confuse me with the facts. -- But you're not teasing.... the fact that this is a Messianic prophecy is not up for debate. ...
If you like the English translation between Jesus and Peter where Jesus asked if Peter loved him and Peter said he loved him, -- the by all means keep that misrepresented account. But if you want to know what actually transpired, then you need the original text.Are you asking them why they are not born speaking the ancient form of Hebrew?? Do you speak it?
DaDad said:That's not what the angle instructed (Ref. 12:4 & 9), and it might be perilous to disobey an angel.
Thanks,
DaDad
I believe you find GOD's logic illusive.I find your logic illusive just then.
DaDad said:... Daniel wrote that he perceived (biyn -- Ref. 1 Kings 3, simple wisdom -shama vs Solomon wisdom - biyn) the Books, which turns out to the be Book of Psalms.
Nope ...
Nope. Daniel wrote that he perceived (biyn -- Ref. 1 Kings 3, simple wisdom -shama vs Solomon wisdom - biyn) the Books, which turns out to the be Book of Psalms.
Dan. 9:2 in the first year of his reign, I, Daniel, perceived [H995] (biyn) in the books the number of years which, according to the word of the Lord to Jeremiah the prophet, must pass before the end of the desolations of Jerusalem, namely, seventy years.
1 Kings 3:12 behold, I now do according to your word. Behold, I give you a wise and discerning
[H995] (biyn) mind, so that none like you has been before you and none like you shall arise after you.
You know, it would be great if you'd do your own research before you made your unsubstantiated assertions ...
Ummmmmm, I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but the seventieth week is complete,
That's not what the angle instructed (Ref. 12:4 & 9), and it might be perilous to disobey an angel.
Thanks,
DaDad
I believe you find GOD's logic illusive.
Thanks,
DaDad
That is an ignorant (not-knowing) statement in regards scripture, for numerous persons in the Bible quoted the Bible in a language which was not the original language given:Why would you dilute the literal text by using a translation?
What "original text" are you referring to? Name the text base you are referring to (in Hebrew, Syriac and Koine Greek, etc for each book or portion of book), for all text bases rely upon multiple sources, all of which are copies of copies. There are no "original" MSS left, neither in Hebrew, Syriac, or Koine Greek. None of the "originals" were ever all together in a single location, and never needed to be. God didn't need the "originals" to be preserved and so didn't preserve them. God preserved His "word" through copies, as God did with the Ten Commandments (first copy of stone tables smashed to pieces), and with the several copies of Jeremiah/Baruch (which one "original" the king cut up and threw into the fire, and one "original" (copy of the original, but remade again with more) Jeremiah had thrown into the river), etc....then you need the original text.
Now, I am going to ask this only once, therefore, in the name of Jesus Christ, Are you personally able to read and translate old manuscript Hebrew, Syriac and Koine Greek? Yes/No....Please check your "translation" with the original text to make sure what you think was said, was actually said!...
If you like the English translation between Jesus and Peter where Jesus asked if Peter loved him and Peter said he loved him, -- the by all means keep that misrepresented account. But if you want to know what actually transpired, then you need the original text.
Please check your "translation" with the original text to make sure what you think was said, was actually said!
Thanks,
DaDad
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?