Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If you can't justify it then there is something wrong. Logic has failed somewhere. Either the failure is in the subject matter or in your interpretation of the subject matter or in your thought process itself.That doesn't work either, KIP.
You're not talking to a newbie here.
I've justified (more than once) why God didn't just wipe out the earth's population in a moment of time with a very moral point; only to have it ridiculed.
I think your "justify" is a loaded term, myself.
That's what you'd like us to think, isn't it?
Just take what science feeds us without question?
It's time some of us plebeians stand up to your clipboards and say, "Enough is enough."
I could talk all day on what I think an Internet scientist is; but I'll shorten it down and say that I think he's a person that acts (emphasis on "acts") like he's really interested in learning something (you know -- like a real scientist); then, when you give him some basic doctrine or deep theology, his rebuttal is usually automatic, quick and rude.
I've even been told my answers are something I've made up out of thin air, when the answer itself is commonly taught as basic doctrine.
But that's just part of what I think an Internet scientist is.
He also wants the Bible at the back of the school bus; but then, behind closed doors, he can't stop asking one question after another.
That's what you'd like us to think, isn't it?
Just take what science feeds us without question?
Well, fyi, some don't bow to McGraw-Hill:
Time will tell if it's 'done' or not.
It's time some of us plebeians stand up to your clipboards and say, "Enough is enough."
Not to mention RoboticsMoaning on this forum about "Internet Scientists" is meaningless and not only that, rather rude to many of us who are real scientists(or trainee ones at least). Let alone the fact that you are using a computer made by the scientists you seek to demonise.....
I just like Will Smith a lotIt was a bad film, I think we should leave it at that before the nightmares begin again.
To each his own I suppose......So did I until he became a supporter of Scientology.
You did -- or at least, you attempted to give it to me as advice.Who says I take what science feeds me without question?
It was voted and its done, it is no an issue.
You did -- or at least, you attempted to give it to me as advice.
Remember saying this?
This coming from a creationist who claims that "Embedded Age" is the Inerrant Word of God?? LOL!Okay, you want my answer -- it's going to be sweet and frank.
Keep in mind that this is just my opinion, though; and I don't intend to spend another ten posts defending it.
The "Pluto issue" -- in my opinion -- exposes you Internet scientists for the charlatans I think you really are.
Wrong again. I think most of us did at least some research. This shouldn't have been hard to figure out, since we gave explanations as to why we accepted the new terminology. Of course, you don't remember them.. you have your own "pet" explanation (that we are all "internet charlatans") and you close your mind to everything else.When it was first posted here -- 100% of those that I saw respond -- automatically -- (and I can't stress this word enough) -- automatically agreed with the vote.
No one -- (that I know of) -- researched it first.
We explained to you in some detail, why the predictions made by Embedded Age fails, and why this falsifies Embedded Age. All you do is close your mind and claim it doesn't matter. Now you calim we were being arbitrary. Wrong, again.This tells me that when someone makes a post about ... say ... embedded age, and it is quickly and automatically dismissed as coming from the mind of [what I was called] "a freak in a freak show", the speed and spontaneity with which you guys arrive at your conclusion is bogus.
How about you stop pretending like you even know what it is.We explained to you in some detail, why the predictions made by Embedded Age fails, and why this falsifies Embedded Age.
How about you stop pretending like you even know what it is.
Hearing aids anyone?How about you stop pretending that you don't understand us, when we tell you something you don't want to hear?
How about you stop pretending that you don't understand us, when we tell you something you don't want to hear?
You did -- or at least, you attempted to give it to me as advice.
Remember saying this?
PlutoedIn addition, the word "Pluto" was made the 2006 word-of-the-year to mock the decision.
'Cept of course the part about not believing just as you do and burning eternally in hell because a loving god expects justice.Everything you guys have ever accused us of doing, you end up doing yourselves.
You forget the persecussion!'Cept of course the part about not believing just as you do and burning eternally in hell because a loving god expects justice.
Now maybe if we say something like... "If you don't believe in Pluto as a planet, you will be damned to the eternal lake of H2SO4 with ten foot pirahnas." Would that make you feel a little better?
Sheesh, you guys and your conflation. Really.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?