Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Either way, you do not know the truth, because the truth is not in you. If the truth were in you, you would not speculate, nor would you deny the truth when it is presented to you.
Not that any of us actually care to impress you...but what would impress you?This is exactly what every single religion says. Christianity - whichever version of it you believe in - is no different. It's an unimpressive stance.
It is curious what you are saying. I think it all relies on childhood, religious faith cannot be foisted upon a person; it is not something which is alien to man, but, on the contrary, it is an essential need of human nature, it constitutes the primary content of man’s inner life.Atheism exists because human beings hate "submitting" to anything or anyone more powerful than themselves. We all want to be our own little gods. Theologians say that this is a result of "original sin"-- or an inherited tendency that goes back to the original humans who rebelled against God.
The real question is why billions actually DO believe. This is a much more complex and controversial issue. Was it God who caused the belief or was it totally a human choice or was it learned from others? Or some combination of these?
Personally, I would be impressed if someone could at least propose a method (or at least a starting point for developing such a method) how to determine the validity of exceptional/unfalsibiiable/"supernatural" claims.Not that any of us actually care to impress you...but what would impress you?
Not that any of us actually care to impress you...but what would impress you?
You're not the only psychologist here.Mark,
People “choose” things all the time without full awareness that that they are choosing. Unconscious choices are very common. So just because you were not aware of choosing not to believe in God does not mean that this was so. Something this important to a person’s sense of identity does not just “happen”, nor does a previous belief just disappear. That may be your experience of it, but there are always many influences which affect our feelings and decisions and behaviors of which we are minimally aware.
I am a psychologist (35 years in the mental health field), so I can speak with some authority about such things.
I cannot say why you chose to disbelieve because I do not know you. Even your therapist would have to know you in some depth to have a reasonable hypothesis. Much has to do with why you believed in the first place. Was your belief because of wanting to please other people? Was it entirely intellectual or emotional? Was it purely nominal (in name only)? Many people who grew up in “Christian” homes and/or had many “Christian” friends have gone along with the Christian program just because of family or peer influence, not because they ever truly examined the claims of the faith. The hypocrisy of many of these “Christians” can eventually turn one away from the faith.
Many people say they believe but it is only a social convention and not because they ever fully believed. Perhaps you never really believed and finally could accept this reality. Just stuff to think about. You have come on this Christian website (with a thread dealing with the atheist question) for some reason, perhaps because you are not done thinking about it.
I notice that on your profile you say that you are interested in the "integration of biblical theology and psychology." I wonder what that means in practice? Does it mean accusing your clients of wilful disbelief in the doctrines of your religion?You probably don’t understand the difference between temptation and sin. Everyone is tempted in various ways (even Jesus was tempted) and such temptations are not by our choice. For example, the temptation to doubt God. But in order to sin, you have to act on this temptation. In your case, your likely doubts (which you did not choose) eventually led to your choosing to turn away from God. Only God knows exactly the point at which you chose to turn away. But choose you did. I believe that it is impossible to NOT CHOOSE when it comes to a belief this important. Otherwise you would be just like a soulless robot left to the whims of fate. Nope. You are accountable for everything you think, say, and do… because you are a creature with the capacity to choose. Denial is most basic psychological defense, but the truth is, you are responsible for your disbelief. You can't get out of it this easily.
If we all considered ourselves gods, then there would be no atheists - we would all be theists.Atheism exists because human beings hate "submitting" to anything or anyone more powerful than themselves. We all want to be our own little gods. Theologians say that this is a result of "original sin"-- or an inherited tendency that goes back to the original humans who rebelled against God.
That is indeed an interesting and complex question.The real question is why billions actually DO believe. This is a much more complex and controversial issue. Was it God who caused the belief or was it totally a human choice or was it learned from others? Or some combination of these?
Thomas Swan said:Rather than being an adaptation; most cognitive scientists prefer to describe religion as a byproduct of the evolution of several cognitive mechanisms. These include a HADD, an intrigue for MCI objects, a theory of mind, a distaste for uncertainty and anxiety, a fear of death, a propensity for ritual behavior, a use for moral and pro-social behavior, and a need to form cooperative groups. None of these cognitive biases and motivations require religious ideas, but each has found a place for them.
The mechanisms listed above have proper functions, such as detecting danger or understanding the intentions of other minds, but they've been co-opted or `hijacked' by the super-stimuli that copiously appear in religious narratives (gods and spirits). Whether this hijacking was driven by selection pressures, human motivation, or a cultural happenstance is unclear. At the very least, the evidence suggests that religion has come to fulfill a social and palliative role. For this reason, we could describe religion as an exaptation, because the cognitive mechanisms that define it appear to have acquired an additional, adaptive role to that which they were originally selected for.
(1) is disputable. (2) would apply to any religion with a concept of the afterlife similar to that of Christianity.I have always been a logical, practical guy. Even if God had not revealed Himself to me beyond any doubt (which He did), I would tend toward belief in the triune God of the Bible and therefore follow Jesus. Why? Two reasons: 1) Because of the obvious superior morality of Jesus’ teachings, and 2), because of the logic inherent in Pascal’s hypothetical “wager.” Here is the way I put Pascal’s classic argument:
That's assuming God punishes nonbelievers with Hell. Perhaps the opposite is true and God rewards the sceptics but punishes the believers? So you can "lose" by believing.Given that death is coming to us all, what would be the advantages or disadvantages of believing in God ... if it turned out that there actually was no God? The consequences for believers and nonbelievers would be equal. No advantage either way. Everyone would be equally dead. No winners.
But what would be the advantages (or disadvantages) of believing (or disbelieving) in God if it turned out that there actually WAS a God, and there actually was a heaven and hell as the Bible teaches? In that case, there would be a huge difference in consequences for believers vs. unbelievers. Heaven vs. hell! Eternally! One cannot imagine a more weighty outcome. In this situation, you can’t really lose by believing. But you might lose BIG if you refuse to believe.
Wouldn't your pretence be transparent to a God? Wouldn't he know that you are only feigning belief as a means of self-preservation?As a practical, logical, self-protective guy, I think I would at least try to believe, even without clear proof either way.
What bearing does this have on the truth of religious claims?P.S. - Even while living in this world, believers have some advantages over nonbelievers. The scientific research consistently shows that (on average) people of Christian faith are less fearful, more satisfied with life, and more humanitarian than nonbelievers. The results of my own doctoral dissertation research (published in the International Journal of the Psychology of Religion) revealed much less anxiety and depression in spiritually-oriented Christians than in others. (Of course there are exceptions. I have known some miserable Christians and some relatively happy atheists.)
Your logic fails because your original assumptions are in error.
"Free will" is an illusion.
Do YOU really think so?
I cannot speak for HitchSlap, but I* really think so.
*Note that the I is an illusion also, but it has a useful communicative purpose nonetheless.
Make sure those babies weren't baptized as infants first, or you're in for indigestion like you've never had before.
Yeah, my schedule is full.
I cannot speak for HitchSlap, but I* really think so.
*Note that the I is an illusion also, but it has a useful communicative purpose nonetheless.
I have also come to think this is, at least in some ways, true.
I have also come to think this is, at least in some ways, true.
There is more than one so that would be points.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?